Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #570996
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | rec.arts.sf.science, sci.astro, sci.physics, sci.space.policy |
| Subject | Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon |
| Date | 2016-04-16 19:22 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <v0gauc-4gl.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <f2s2hbhiq497bnrd9g0esf9dd255dk5c0t@4ax.com> <jfb8uc-5ge.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <8124hbt0do1pgiftnskavohbe8h5h268ff@4ax.com> <lk7auc-2mk.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <4t05hbti9ese447v4f2la91oim5edlirv6@4ax.com> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: > jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> >>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For your reference, records indicate that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I really can?t be bothered to figure out the messes you get yourself >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > into. You?ll have to pay me if you want me to do your tech support. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > :-) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unreadable and it is not a utf-8 issue. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [rest of support request snipped] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you sent me a check? If so, you?re going to have to wait until I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can cash it. If not, take your 1980s tech woes elsewhere. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The solution on my end is simple; ignore posts that don't adhere to the RFC. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where is it non-compliant. Since it looks fine to everyone but you, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are you sure it isn't YOUR end that is not RFC compliant? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Rean the RFC. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK. Your reception is non-compliant. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Bile spewing idiot. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> So your complaint that his transmission is non-compliant in the face >>>>>>>>>>>>> of it looking fine to everyone but you would be what? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>When was your poll taken to determine the percentage of people that see >>>>>>>>>>>>those characters as a single quote? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Why are you the only one complaining, Jim? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Only one to notice. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yes, that's what I've said, but you wanted to argue with me about it. >>>>>>>>> Nobody else sees it, Jim. It's just YOU. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>And your poll was taken when, space cadet, or are you claiming to be >>>>>>>>able to read minds now? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You can't even AGREE with Jimp the Simp Chimp without him wanting to >>>>>>> argue. Chimp, *YOU* said "Only one to notice" in response to my >>>>>>> asking you why you were the only one complaining. I agreed with your >>>>>>> response and now you want to know when *I* ran a poll? When did YOU >>>>>>> run a poll, dipshit? >>>>>> >>>>>>What you actually said was "Nobody else sees it...", liar. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You're stuck again, chimp. YOU said what you are complaining that *I* >>>>> said. >>>> >>>>In English please. >>>> >>> >>> That is English. I'm sorry, are the words to big for you? >>> >>>>> See above, where your answer to why you are the only one >>>>> complaining is that you are "the only one to notice". In other words, >>>>> nobody else saw it. >>>> >>>>YOU asked for reasons and I gave you a LIST of POSSIBLE reasons. >>>> >>> >>> And then proceeded to berate me for agreeing with you. >>> >>>> >>>>You jumped on one and ran with it like dog with a sock in its mouth. >>>> >>> >>> And you have all along been squalling like a chimp with a pepper up >>> its ass. >>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Look two sentences above your lie. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Look at your agreement that you are "only one to notice". >>>> >>>>Look at the list where that is one of many. >>>> >>> >>> Irrelevant. You've expended great effort to berate me for AGREEING >>> with you. >>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Only one to make the effort to comment. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And nobody bothered even when you started caterwauling about it? Why >>>>>>>>> do they all hate you so, Jim? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>"caterwauling"? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Look it up. I'll try to restrict myself to one syllable words in >>>>>>> future so that perhaps you can follow along. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>If anyone is caterwauling it is you, going on and on and on and on and on >>>>>>>>about something that has nothing to do with you. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Perhaps if you actually answered the questions instead of ducking >>>>>>> them? Just a thought. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>If anyone is caterwauling it is you, going on and on and on and on and on >>>>>>about something that has nothing to do with you. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You're wailing in several public fora about this, Jimp. Your wailing >>>>> makes it everyone's business. >>>>> >>>> >>>>I am responding whatever YOU posted to. >>>> >>> >>> Uh, YOU started this discussion, Chimp. >>> >>>> >>>>If you are posting to too many groups, that is YOUR issue. >>>> >>> >>> Usenet NEWS is not email, Chimp. Why did you post this to ANY >>> newsgroup in the first place? >>> >>>>>>>>>>A statement of fact is not a complaint. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Really? On what planet? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>All of them. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Bullshit. Are you stupid or are you a liar? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Let me help you out. "This meat is overcooked." Assuming the meat >>>>>>>>> actually is overcooked, that's a statement of fact. It's also a >>>>>>>>> complaint about the state of the meat. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Only to the thin skinned and ultra sensitive, which fits you very well. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So it's stupid and you don't know the meaning of the word 'complaint'. >>>>>>> So what does 'complaint' mean on Planet Chimp? Here on Earth where >>>>>>> English speaking humans live it means "a statement that a situation is >>>>>>> unsatisfactory". You know, like the overdone meat isn't satisfactory. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Now tell me again how a "statement of fact is not a complaint". >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>A statement of fact is not a complaint. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You're stupid. You seem to think that a complaint must be untrue. >>>>>> >>>>>>Nope, but you seem to think a statement of fact MUST be a complaint. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Where did you get that from? >>>>> >>>> >>>>From YOUR diatribe on the subject. >>>> >>> >>> And once again we see that Chimp Just Can't Read. YOU complained in a >>> public newsgroup that someone was (according to you) doing something >>> that "isn't RFC compliant". That's a COMPLAINT, Chimp, which is why >>> you ranted on and on about it to the point of killfiling the >>> 'offender'. Then you claimed "A statement of fact is not a >>> complaint." When I point out that it most certainly can be, you stand >>> on your head and claim I've once again said something that I never >>> said (that all statements of fact are complaints). >>> >>> If you didn't want everyone on the newsgroup involved, WHY DID YOU >>> POST YOUR COMPLAINT THERE? >>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>Why do you care so much that you keep going on about it? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Because I think it gives great insight into how your head works (or >>>>>>>>>>> doesn't). You're the only one complaining, yet you insist that the >>>>>>>>>>> problem must be at his end. Typical of you. Jim is never wrong; it's >>>>>>>>>>> always the other guy. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>And you are the only school yard bully going on and on and on and on >>>>>>>>>>about it. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Why did you bring it up? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Because reading his posts were annoying, but I have solved that problem. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yet here you are, still caterwauling about it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>You are the one going on and on and on and on and on about something >>>>>>>>that has absolutely nothing to do with you. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You 'solved the problem' (from your perspective, which solution is to >>>>>>> simply steadfastly ignore that part of reality; very like your usual >>>>>>> 'solution' to things). So why are you still wanking on about it? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>If anyone is caterwauling it is you. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yeah, Chimp. It's always someone else and never you... >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>You are the one going on and on and on and on and on about something >>>>>>that has absolutely nothing to do with you. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I'm just responding to your whines in a public forum, Chimp. >>>>> >>>>> Usenet isn't email, remember? >>>>> >>>> >>>>What does email have to do with anything, space cadet, or is that the >>>>only red herring you could think of at the moment? >>>> >>> >>> What email has to do with anything, chimp, is that if you think what >>> you had to say isn't anyone's business but the gentleman you were >>> complaining about and you, email is the proper tool for that exchange. >>> Since you obviously thought it was the business of the entire cluster >>> of newsgroups you posted it to (because you posted it there), it's >>> rather stupid for you to complain about how it "has absolutely nothing >>> to do with [me]" now. If you believe that, YOU SHOULD HAVE SENT YOUR >>> COMPLAINT IN EMAIL IN THE FIRST PLACE. >>> >>> Usenet isn't email, chimp. >> >>Says the denier every bit as wacko as the Holocaust deniers. >> > > You're a lying sack of shit, Jim. Racist deniers aren't worth talking to. -- Jim Pennino
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> - 2016-04-13 15:39 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 09:34 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-13 17:59 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 12:57 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-13 20:34 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 19:15 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-14 04:06 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 00:47 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-14 18:05 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 14:30 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-14 22:26 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 16:56 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-15 00:25 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 18:30 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-15 02:09 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 21:41 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-15 21:33 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-15 15:49 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-15 23:46 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 02:38 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-16 16:57 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 11:25 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-16 19:21 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 12:55 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-16 20:49 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 19:39 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-17 05:23 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 23:58 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Doc O'Leary <droleary@2015usenet1.subsume.com> - 2016-04-14 16:46 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-14 18:06 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 14:31 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-14 22:27 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 16:56 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-15 00:26 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 18:32 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-15 02:10 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 21:41 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-15 21:34 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-15 15:50 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-13 17:53 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 12:56 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-13 20:35 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 19:17 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-14 04:07 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 00:48 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-14 18:08 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 14:35 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-14 22:29 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 17:05 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-15 00:32 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 19:20 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-15 21:38 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-15 16:00 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-15 23:52 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 02:49 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-16 16:59 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Mikkel Haaheim <mikkelhaaheim@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 10:49 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-16 18:16 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Mikkel Haaheim <mikkelhaaheim@gmail.com> - 2016-04-17 00:32 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-17 17:35 +0000
Name calling is allowed/expected. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-04-16 12:00 -0700
Re: Name calling is allowed/expected. benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-16 15:14 -0400
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 11:26 -0700
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-16 19:22 +0000
Re: The European Space Agency just unveiled its plans to build a base on the moon Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 12:54 -0700
csiph-web