Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #544354
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: MythBusters: Bringing on the physics bullet drop |
| Date | 2016-01-11 00:20 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <u39bmc-ol7.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <dc7b73f2-4fc7-42d2-a8d1-eca6c0a5379b@googlegroups.com> <b3tamc-m86.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <42507f38-4e13-422f-a526-1e88e5a6864a@googlegroups.com> <r42bmc-c37.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <6dff8f83-bed1-4432-a3f5-d34523f9ee05@googlegroups.com> |
pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: > On Sunday, January 10, 2016 at 2:31:05 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> pnal...@gmail.com wrote: >> > On Sunday, January 10, 2016 at 1:01:05 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >> pnal...@gmail.com wrote: >> > >> >> > Does this mean you cannot produce any links at all that support your claim? >> >> >> >> Does this mean you cannot produce any links at all that refute my claims? >> > >> > I produced several links that refuted your claim, that claim being that bullets have lift... and having lift implies that they rise. They do not rise. >> > >> >> Read your links closely. >> >> I never claimed bullets rise... What I claimed was that the vertical rate of descent of a fired bullet is less than that of a dropped bullet in air. > > Well then, what you claimed agrees completely with what was said in the link that Sam posted... > No, it does not. > "There you have it. The y-component of air resistance for the fired bullet still depends on the fired speed of the bullet (since it is proportional to v2). A fired bullet (with air resistance) does not hit the ground at the same time as a dropped bullet." > > ... so why bother with the snarky remark in the first place? 1. The poster is a cut and paste spamming ass hat. 2. The cut and paste article is simplistic. > In my opinion, I think using the word "lift" for this is a poor choice of words, I clearly thought you were talking about something very different. I said lift and I meant lift and both you and the article completely ignored my remarks about drag and orientation. -- Jim Pennino
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
MythBusters: Bringing on the physics bullet drop Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 20:54 -0600
Re: MythBusters: Bringing on the physics bullet drop jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-10 03:09 +0000
Re: MythBusters: Bringing on the physics bullet drop pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-01-09 21:25 -0800
Re: MythBusters: Bringing on the physics bullet drop jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-10 06:27 +0000
Re: MythBusters: Bringing on the physics bullet drop pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-01-10 10:00 -0800
Re: MythBusters: Bringing on the physics bullet drop jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-10 20:55 +0000
Re: MythBusters: Bringing on the physics bullet drop pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-01-10 13:40 -0800
Re: MythBusters: Bringing on the physics bullet drop jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-10 22:21 +0000
Re: MythBusters: Bringing on the physics bullet drop pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-01-10 15:56 -0800
Re: MythBusters: Bringing on the physics bullet drop jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-11 00:20 +0000
Re: MythBusters: Bringing on the physics bullet drop pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-01-10 16:58 -0800
Re: MythBusters: Bringing on the physics bullet drop jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-11 01:16 +0000
Re: MythBusters: Bringing on the physics bullet drop Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-01-10 10:12 +0100
Re: MythBusters: Bringing on the physics bullet drop john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-10 04:38 -0800
Re: MythBusters: Bringing on the physics bullet drop R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-01-10 22:29 +0000
Re: MythBusters: Bringing on the physics bullet drop jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-10 23:13 +0000
Re: MythBusters: Bringing on the physics bullet drop Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-01-10 10:27 -0800
Re: MythBusters: Bringing on the physics bullet drop R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-01-11 01:23 +0000
Re: MythBusters: Bringing on the physics bullet drop jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-11 03:16 +0000
Re: MythBusters: Bringing on the physics bullet drop john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-10 20:08 -0800
csiph-web