Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #716519
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.math, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test |
| Date | 2018-12-04 04:52 +0000 |
| Organization | The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 |
| Message-ID | <pu516r$b7b$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <121699cc-7db0-4354-b48a-5ee28914375b@googlegroups.com> <1fe51aa5-91f9-41b9-94cf-7db9072938e2@googlegroups.com> <da3f3584-6f6a-4554-a5d7-73690884a09d@googlegroups.com> <838d28aa-f533-4c9f-9682-687aedb5c414@googlegroups.com> <052da7bd-093a-494b-a646-244eb918d390@googlegroups.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails: >Subject: Re: does Stillwell like Olcott believe 10 OR 2 = 12 as well as >the rest of the math community that embraces Boole Re: Is Stillwell a >**Rascist Mathematician** for not acknowleding AP's proof ellipse >Is Stillwell as dumb as Pete Olcott with his Boole logic of 10 OR 2 = 12 >while 10 AND 2 = 8. No wonder Stillwell never amounted to much in >mathematics other than write books of what others "thought". Aww, CRAP! Plutonium failed yet again! Who is going to clean it up this time? Not only does the stupid dead guy George Boole keep on kicking Plutonium's ass at logic, Plutonium doesn't even know how to play the game! Nobody who uses Boolean logic would EVER say 10 OR 2 = 12 or 10 AND 2 = 8. Maybe Plutonium doesn't even know the difference between Boolean OR/AND and addition/subtraction? How dumb and stoopid is that, Al? "I cannot believe how incredibly stupid Archie-Poo is. I mean rock-hard stupid. Blazing hot mid-day sun on Mercury stupid. Surface of Venus under 80 atmospheres of red hot carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid vapor dehydrated for 300 million years rock-hard stupid. Stupid so stupid that it goes way beyond the stupid we know into a whole different sensorium of stupid. Archie-Poo is trans-stupid stupid. Meta-stupid. Stupid so collapsed upon itself that it is within its own Schwarzschild radius. Black hole stupid. Stupid gotten so dense and massive that no intellect can escape. Singularity stupid. Archie-Poo emits more stupid/second than our entire galaxy otherwise emits stupid/year. Quasar stupid. Nothing else in the universe can be this stupid. Archie-Poo is an oozingly putrescent primordial fragment from the original Big Bang of Stupid, a pure essence of stupid so uncontaminated by anything else as to be beyond the laws of physics that define maximally extrapolated hypergeometric n-dimensional backgroundless stupid as we can imagine it. Archie-Poo is Planck stupid, a quantum foam of stupid, a vacuum decay of stupid, a grand unified theory of stupid. Archie-Poo is the epitome of stupidity, the epiphany of stupid, the apotheosis of stupidity. Archie-poo is stooopid."
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
thought I found the 8, I needed in Faraday law of muon to proton ratio of 105 to 840 in the torus density. But no, for rather it appears the 8, to be in Lewis structure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 14:03 -0800
Octet rule Re: thought I found the 8, I needed in Faraday law of muon to proton ratio of 105 to 840 in the torus density. But no, for rather it appears the 8, to be in Lewis structure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-11-30 13:25 -0800
Re: thought I found the 8, I needed in Faraday law of muon to proton ratio of 105 to 840 in the torus density. But no, for rather it appears the 8, to be in Lewis structure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-11-30 13:26 -0800
Re: thought I found the 8, I needed in Faraday law of muon to proton ratio of 105 to 840 in the torus density. But no, for rather it appears the 8, to be in Lewis structure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-11-30 13:39 -0800
Re: thought I found the 8, I needed in Faraday law of muon to proton ratio of 105 to 840 in the torus density. But no, for rather it appears the 8, to be in Lewis structure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 14:59 -0800
NO molecule Re: complementary bonding 6 & 8 based Lewis structure //Faraday law of muon to proton ratio of 105MeV to 840MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 18:18 -0800
seeing the chemical covalent bond as the joining together of half toruses in Faraday Law //Faraday law of muon to proton ratio of 105MeV to 840MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-12-02 16:03 -0800
geometry of P suborbitals-- are they toruses and how to make maximum electricity Re: seeing the chemical covalent bond as the joining together of half toruses in Faraday Law Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-12-02 20:51 -0800
Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-04 04:52 +0000
Re: geometry of P suborbitals-- are they toruses and how to make maximum electricity Re: seeing the chemical covalent bond as the joining together of half toruses in Faraday Law Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-12-03 22:34 -0800
Re: Archimedes "front oage hog" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-04 22:22 +0000
csiph-web