Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #716519

Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

From moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Newsgroups sci.math, sci.physics
Subject Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test
Date 2018-12-04 04:52 +0000
Organization The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989
Message-ID <pu516r$b7b$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <121699cc-7db0-4354-b48a-5ee28914375b@googlegroups.com> <1fe51aa5-91f9-41b9-94cf-7db9072938e2@googlegroups.com> <da3f3584-6f6a-4554-a5d7-73690884a09d@googlegroups.com> <838d28aa-f533-4c9f-9682-687aedb5c414@googlegroups.com> <052da7bd-093a-494b-a646-244eb918d390@googlegroups.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:

>Subject: Re: does Stillwell like Olcott believe 10 OR 2 = 12 as well as 
>the rest of the math community that embraces Boole Re: Is Stillwell a 
>**Rascist Mathematician** for not acknowleding AP's proof ellipse

>Is Stillwell as dumb as Pete Olcott with his Boole logic of 10 OR 2 = 12
>while 10 AND 2 = 8. No wonder Stillwell never amounted to much in
>mathematics other than write books of what others "thought".

Aww, CRAP! Plutonium failed yet again! Who is going to clean it up this
time?

Not only does the stupid dead guy George Boole keep on kicking Plutonium's
ass at logic, Plutonium doesn't even know how to play the game! Nobody
who uses Boolean logic would EVER say  10 OR 2 = 12 or 10 AND 2 = 8.
Maybe Plutonium doesn't even know the difference between Boolean OR/AND
and addition/subtraction? How dumb and stoopid is that, Al?


"I cannot believe how incredibly stupid Archie-Poo is.  I mean rock-hard
stupid.  Blazing hot mid-day sun on Mercury stupid.  Surface of Venus
under 80 atmospheres of red hot carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid vapor
dehydrated for 300 million years rock-hard stupid.  Stupid so stupid that
it goes way beyond the stupid we know into a whole different sensorium of
stupid.  Archie-Poo is trans-stupid stupid. Meta-stupid.  Stupid so
collapsed upon itself that it is within its own Schwarzschild radius.  
Black hole stupid.  Stupid gotten so dense and massive that no intellect
can escape.  Singularity stupid. Archie-Poo emits more stupid/second than
our entire galaxy otherwise emits stupid/year.  Quasar stupid.  Nothing
else in the universe can be this stupid.  Archie-Poo is an oozingly
putrescent primordial fragment from the original Big Bang of Stupid, a
pure essence of stupid so uncontaminated by anything else as to be beyond
the laws of physics that define maximally extrapolated hypergeometric
n-dimensional backgroundless stupid as we can imagine it.  Archie-Poo is
Planck stupid, a quantum foam of stupid, a vacuum decay of stupid, a grand
unified theory of stupid.

Archie-Poo is the epitome of stupidity, the epiphany of stupid, the
apotheosis of stupidity.  Archie-poo is stooopid."

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

thought I found the 8, I needed in Faraday law of muon to proton ratio of 105 to 840 in the torus density. But no, for rather it appears the 8, to be in Lewis structure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 14:03 -0800
  Octet rule Re: thought I found the 8, I needed in Faraday law of muon to proton ratio of 105 to 840 in the torus density. But no, for rather it appears the 8, to be in Lewis structure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-11-30 13:25 -0800
  Re: thought I found the 8, I needed in Faraday law of muon to proton ratio of 105 to 840 in the torus density. But no, for rather it appears the 8, to be in Lewis structure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-11-30 13:26 -0800
    Re: thought I found the 8, I needed in Faraday law of muon to proton ratio of 105 to 840 in the torus density. But no, for rather it appears the 8, to be in Lewis structure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-11-30 13:39 -0800
      Re: thought I found the 8, I needed in Faraday law of muon to proton ratio of 105 to 840 in the torus density. But no, for rather it appears the 8, to be in Lewis structure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 14:59 -0800
        NO molecule Re: complementary bonding 6 & 8 based Lewis structure //Faraday law of muon to proton ratio of 105MeV to 840MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 18:18 -0800
          seeing the chemical covalent bond as the joining together of half toruses in Faraday Law //Faraday law of muon to proton ratio of 105MeV to 840MeV Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-12-02 16:03 -0800
            geometry of P suborbitals-- are they toruses and how to make maximum electricity Re: seeing the chemical covalent bond as the joining together of half toruses in Faraday Law Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-12-02 20:51 -0800
              Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-04 04:52 +0000
              Re: geometry of P suborbitals-- are they toruses and how to make maximum electricity Re: seeing the chemical covalent bond as the joining together of half toruses in Faraday Law Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-12-03 22:34 -0800
                Re: Archimedes "front oage hog" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-04 22:22 +0000

csiph-web