Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #705967

Re: IF WE HAVE F = Ma - THEN ???...

Show all headers | View raw

<poraty149@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 3, 2018 at 3:35:45 AM UTC+3, pora...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Tuesday, October 2, 2018 at 4:19:42 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>> <poraty149@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Tuesday, October 2, 2018 at 9:35:07 AM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>>> <poraty149@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Tuesday, October 2, 2018 at 6:53:26 AM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>>>>> <poraty149@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> if we have the formula 
>>>>>>>> F = M a 
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> what is that is making the force / acceleration there ?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> is it the Meter (length )?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> is it the Second  (Time ) there ?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> or is it the M
>>>>>>>> masses there
>>>>>>>> that are making the force ther ??
>>>>>>>> (:-)
>>>>>>>> --------------------------------
>>>>>>>> TIA
>>>>>>>> Y.Porat
>>>>>>>> ===============================> > >>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Well, in most cases we are familiar with, it is electric charges making the
>>>>>>> force, since the electromagnetic interaction dominates. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ================> > >>> thank you Bodkin 
>>>>>> it seem that while i open my mouth
>>>>>> you know good enough from  previous experience 
>>>>>> that it might be interesting ..... 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> so 
>>>>>> what  makes the electric charges ??
>>>>>> or magnetic charges  ??
>>>>>> i thought with  my primitive understanding of physics 
>>>>>> that 
>>>>>> electric   magnetic forces etc -
>>>>>> are done by ?? !!
>>>>>> may be you will  tell  us ?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> electrons protons quarks ??
>>>>>> you name it 
>>>>>> but what are all the above ??
>>>>>> if not mass ??
>>>>>> can they be /act  without mass ??
>>>>> 
>>>>> Correlation is not causation. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> When two cars have an accident, there is always air present. In every
>>>>> single case! But the air is not the cause of the car collision.
>>>> 
>>>> =============================> > > you are smart guying  again (OBFUSCATING) 
>>>> we talk about physics theory 
>>>> not on air  in  car accident !!
>>>> in that accident
>>>> you can find the underwear  of the driver as well 
>>> 
>>> Exactly. Correlation doesnt imply causation. 
>>> 
>>>> and now the ''coherent'  of yours  Bodkin :
>>>> 
>>>> CAN  THERE BE A TANGIBLE FORCE 
>>>> WHILE NO   MASS IS FOUND THERE ??
>>> 
>>> Correlation does not imply causation. 
>>> 
>> ===============================> correlation is a nice impressive word !!
>> now it is  your turn 
>> not to play with words but facts !!
>> 
>> how do you explain he fact 
>> that*** mass and forces** 
>> come 
>> 
>> ALWAYS***  TOGETHER !1??
>> 2
>> if we find that
>> F=   ** m **a 
>> is it a correlation or a fact ??
>> ===> TIA
>> Y.P
>> ================= 
> the samke crock behaviour !!
> 
> i knew another type
> calles
> Paul Draper (P D)
> that is calling himself Bodkin 
> a physics teacher !!..
> whenever i ''pushed him to the corner '' 
> he was 
> just faaaiding away !!

Porat, please remember that while you are retired, other people work and
only post in their spare time. Also remember that people sleep for a third
of their day, and that the schedule for that does not overlap with when you
do the same. 

You consistently complain that people “fade away” when you do not get
responses within a few hours of your last reply. You don’t seem to get that
people have lives that are not centered on posting to sci.physics. 

> 
> before being a teacher
> teach yourself
> to be 
> a human    being !!!
> ==Y.Porat
> ======================
> 
> 



-- 
Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

IF WE HAVE   F = Ma  - THEN ???... poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-01 20:18 -0700
  Re: IF WE HAVE F = Ma - THEN ???... Richard Cranium <invalid@example.com> - 2018-10-01 20:40 -0700
    Re: IF WE HAVE F = Ma - THEN ???... poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-01 22:54 -0700
      Re: IF WE HAVE F = Ma - THEN ???... poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-01 23:03 -0700
        Re: IF WE HAVE F = Ma - THEN ???... Randy Cunningham <invalid@example.com> - 2018-10-02 00:25 -0700
          Re: IF WE HAVE F = Ma - THEN ???... poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-02 04:21 -0700
  Re: IF WE HAVE  F = Ma - THEN ???... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 03:53 +0000
    Re: IF WE HAVE  F = Ma - THEN ???... poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-01 23:27 -0700
      Re: IF WE HAVE F = Ma - THEN ???... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 06:35 +0000
        Re: IF WE HAVE F = Ma - THEN ???... poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-02 01:59 -0700
          Re: IF WE HAVE F = Ma - THEN ???... poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-02 04:15 -0700
          Re: IF WE HAVE F = Ma - THEN ???... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 12:21 +0000
        Re: IF WE HAVE F = Ma - THEN ???... poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-02 05:30 -0700
          Re: IF WE HAVE F = Ma - THEN ???... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:19 +0000
            Re: IF WE HAVE F = Ma - THEN ???... poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-02 17:35 -0700
              Re: IF WE HAVE F = Ma - THEN ???... poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-02 21:52 -0700
                Re: IF WE HAVE F = Ma - THEN ???... poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-02 21:55 -0700
                Re: IF WE HAVE F = Ma - THEN ???... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 05:17 +0000
                Re: IF WE HAVE F = Ma - THEN ???... poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-02 23:17 -0700
                Re: IF WE HAVE F = Ma - THEN ???... poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-03 23:27 -0700
                Re: IF WE HAVE F = Ma - THEN ???... poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-03 23:35 -0700
                Re: IF WE HAVE F = Ma - THEN ???... poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-10-04 20:45 -0700
          Re: IF WE HAVE F = Ma - THEN ???... Sandy Huntington <invalid@example.com> - 2018-10-02 17:13 -0700

csiph-web