Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #705234
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.math, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Archimedes "Total Failure" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test |
| Date | 2018-09-30 01:59 +0000 |
| Organization | The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 |
| Message-ID | <popam6$f3g$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink) |
| References | <8a7b526a-2301-4a76-af55-9b2d71a3a0bd@googlegroups.com> <6034d30a-b12b-44cc-989a-f4873fed1da4@googlegroups.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:
>Imp-parade in sci.math of imps with fake-arguments that ellipse is a conic
>First we start out with a dumb German named Franz hiding behind "Me"
So you *still* don't have any proof that Franz's proof is wrong.
FAIL.
SInce you asked, here it is again!
Below you will find a simple *proof* that shows that certain conic
sections are ellipses.
Some preliminaries:
Top view of the conic section and depiction of the coordinate system used
in the proof:
^ x
|
-+- <= x=h
.' | `.
. | .
| | |
' | '
`. | .'
y <----------+ <= x=0
Cone (side view):
.
/|\
/ | \
/b | \
/---+---' <= x = h
/ |' \
/ ' | \
/ ' | \
x = 0 => '-------+-------\
/ a | \
Proof:
r(x) = a - ((a-b)/h)x and d(x) = a - ((a+b)/h)x, hence
y(x)^2 = r(x)^2 - d(x)^2 = ab - ab(2x/h - 1)^2 = ab(1 - 4(x - h/2)^2/h^2.
Hence (1/ab)y(x)^2 + (4/h^2)(x - h/2)^2 = 1 ...equation of an ellipse
qed
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 19:43 -0700
Re: The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 12:37 -0700
Re: The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 10:14 -0700
Re: The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 17:32 -0700
Re: Archimedes "Total Failure" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-30 01:59 +0000
Re: The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 11:32 -0700
Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-30 19:18 +0000
MIT's Michael Artin, Martin Bazant, Bonnie Berger, Roman Bezrukavnikov, Alexei Borodin, why cannot Moroney admit 938 is not 12% short of 945 ? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:38 -0700
csiph-web