Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #699114

Re: Archimedes "Total Failure" Plutonium flunked the lifetime-generation test

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

Once again, it appears you are whining that people are responding to your
posts.  That is completely expected in a discussion group like this one!
You attack myself and several others who respond to your posts (as we are
certainly allowed to). Expect to get replies when you are completely WRONG
like saying the ellipse is not a conic section just because you say so,
when there are multiple math proofs that PROVE the ellipse IS a conic
section.

Do you actually think that if you post "The ellipse is not a conic
section because I said so!" enough times, geometry will suddenly change
so that the ellipse is no longer a conic section? That is so STUPID!
Just like you think if you spam "Let's thank AP for broken trig" 160+
times, people will actually thank you for incorrect trigonometry?
Since you appear to be clueless, I'll give you two free clues: 1) People
don't like incorrect trigonometry (or any other incorrect math) and
2) People do NOT like your spam!

And WHY do you always respond with a variation of the same retarded post,
with stalker lists of uninvolved professors, a repetition of the same
discredited ellipse-not-conic-section claim and that stupid ascii art
cat/owl thing that lives in a cubbyhole? Are you autistic or just
retarded?

Once again, it appears you are trying to project your own gayness onto
myself and several others who respond to your posts. Quit stalking us with
your projected gayness, I for one am NOT interested. Go hang out in a gay
bar or something.

(and watch: Archie will respond to this, in a completely different/new
topic, probably several times, each time including that thing in its
cubbyhole and a stalker list of Harvard/MIT profs who have never heard of
me. I have set foot on the campuses of Harvard and MIT probably a dozen
times in my lifetime, combined)

Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:

>Peter Kronheimer, Jacob Lurie of Harvard asked by Volney/Moroney
>report-- WHY teach fake-math,

Fake math like " ellipse is never a conic, for ellipse is a
cylinder section"?

Here's the proof!
Below you will find a simple *proof* that shows that certain conic
sections are ellipses.

Some preliminaries:

Top view of the conic section and depiction of the coordinate system used
in the proof:

              ^ x
              |
             -+- < xh
         .'   |   `.
        .     |     .
        |     |     |
        '     |     '      
         `.   |   .'
 y <----------+ < x0
             
Cone (side view):
                 .
                /|\
               / | \
              /b |  \
             /---+---' < x  h
            /    |'   \
           /   ' |     \
          / '    |      \
x  0 > '-------+-------\
        /    a   |        \

Proof:

r(x)  a - ((a-b)/h)x  and  d(x)  a - ((a+b)/h)x,  hence

y(x)^2  r(x)^2 - d(x)^2  ab - ab(2x/h - 1)^2  ab(1 - 4(x - h/2)^2/h^2.

Hence (1/ab)y(x)^2 + (4/h^2)(x - h/2)^2  1  ...equation of an ellipse

qed



>AP writes:: Is Dan Christensen doing a study on the hypothesis that most
>sci.math, sci.physics stalkers are gay, who failed science and now
>stalking the sci.math, sci.physics due to failure and that somehow,
>homosexuals in science, cannot seem to focus on objectivity-- studying if
>Volney/Moroney 25 year stalker, Dan Christensen 5 year stalker, KON 5
>year stalker, Zelos Malum 2 year stalker, Jan Bielawski 23 year stalker,
>Jan Burse 4 year stalker, Alouatta 2 year stalker, Eastside 2 year
>stalker, whether they are all gay, and whether any of them actually has a
>degree in math.

Why is the failure Archimedes Plutonium trying to turn sci.physics and
sci.math into a gay pickup bar AGAIN? Meanwhile it seems, he is projecting
his own issues with gayness onto me, Volney, Dan C, KON, Zelos, Jan/Jan,
Alouatta and Eastside? Get over it, Failure Plutonium, it is 2018 now, not
1958, so don't project your own "issues" onto us, but learn to accept
them. But don't try to turn these groups into a gay pickup bar like you
did before.

<snip more of Archie's projections>

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Eric Maskin, Barry Mazur of Harvard asked by Volney/Moroney report-- WHY teach fake-math, ellipse is never a conic, for ellipse is a cylinder section (see proof below) Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-08-18 13:59 -0700
  Re: Archimedes "Total Failure" Plutonium flunked the lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-18 22:01 +0000

csiph-web