Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #687680
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, sci.math |
| Subject | Re: Archimedes "Failure" Plutonium flunked physics lifelong-generation test |
| Date | 2018-05-29 18:04 +0000 |
| Organization | The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 |
| Message-ID | <pek4ms$ptg$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink) |
| References | <ee31cae8-6cd7-421b-b458-cf1779533f85@googlegroups.com> <14bdd205-7d77-474d-9422-278ab13c9bda@googlegroups.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails: >Moroney, do you stalk Once again, Failure Plutonium, trying to discuss things in a discussion group is not "stalking". But I see you are *still* too stoopid to realize that if you keep attacking me, you'll keep my attention. There have been many other kooks here that I don't bother with because they don't attack me. Meanwhile, we need to discuss your failures. How do you plan to correct your failures? >>Moroney, when you going to admit to your mistakes-- >When are YOU going to admit all of YOUR mistakes? >You have made HUNDREDS of mistakes! Maybe even thousands!!! >Atoms use unstable muons, not electrons, for bonding: FAIL. >Ellipse is not a conic section despite several proofs that it is: FAIL. >Universe is part of some cosmic atom: FAIL. >Unable to look up/use the correct mass for the muon: FAIL. >Posting stalker lists of university staff for, who knows why: FAIL. >Thinks that 8.88 is "exactly" 9: FAIL. >Unable to understand that 8.88 muon masses is 0.12 muon masses (or 12% >of a muon mass) short of 9: FAIL. >Attacking me for 26 years and wondering why I defend myself: FAIL. >Thinking "If I thought it up, it must be true": FAIL. >How much of a failure are you? >Uncle Al said it best! >"I cannot believe how incredibly stupid Archie-Poo is. I mean rock-hard >stupid. Blazing hot mid-day sun on Mercury stupid. Surface of Venus >under 80 atmospheres of red hot carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid vapor >dehydrated for 300 million years rock-hard stupid. Stupid so stupid that >it goes way beyond the stupid we know into a whole different sensorium of >stupid. Archie-Poo is trans-stupid stupid. Meta-stupid. Stupid so >collapsed upon itself that it is within its own Schwarzschild radius. >Black hole stupid. Stupid gotten so dense and massive that no intellect >can escape. Singularity stupid. Archie-Poo emits more stupid/second than >our entire galaxy otherwise emits stupid/year. Quasar stupid. Nothing >else in the universe can be this stupid. Archie-Poo is an oozingly >putrescent primordial fragment from the original Big Bang of Stupid, a >pure essence of stupid so uncontaminated by anything else as to be beyond >the laws of physics that define maximally extrapolated hypergeometric >n-dimensional backgroundless stupid as we can imagine it. Archie-Poo is >Planck stupid, a quantum foam of stupid, a vacuum decay of stupid, a grand >unified theory of stupid. >Archie-Poo is the epitome of stupidity, the epiphany of stupid, the >apotheosis of stupidity. Archie-poo is stooopid." >
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
2//39,40,41-Maximum Electricity Coil theory// Some history on the erroneous Lewis structure of 1916, using 8 when it should use 6 Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 10:01 -0700 Re: Archimedes "Failure" Plutonium flunked physics lifelong-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-05-29 18:04 +0000
csiph-web