Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #682134

Re: Response to Arindham; By James McGinn Atmospheric Physicist and top expert on water in the atmosphere

Show all headers | View raw

On 4/23/2018 12:08 PM, Edward Prochak wrote:
> On Friday, April 20, 2018 at 4:45:10 PM UTC-4, James McGinn wrote:
>> On Monday, April 16, 2018 at 12:19:15 AM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>>> H2O is not just poorly understood it has been badly mischaracterized by the 
>>>>>> fact that us humans want to believe it is something it is not--simple.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> H2O as you and I know it is not very polar. It is neutral. Individual 
>>>>>> molecules, however, are very polar.  Understanding how and why both of these 
>>>>>> statements are true is the subject of a video that I will be releasing in 
>>>>>> about two weeks.  I will be dropping a link to it here in this forum.
>>
>> Exactly two weeks ago I promised this link:
>> Incidental Symmetry: Solution to H2O Anomalies
>> https://youtu.be/ZyYsDGQ76J4
> 
> 
> Uh, James, your original promise was made March 5
> Message-ID: <532f077c-6308-4ba0-a2bd-b4391cdad432@googlegroups.com>
> Subject: Re: Response to Arindham; By James McGinn Atmospheric Physicist and
>  top expert on water in the atmosphere
> From: James McGinn <jimmc...@gmail.com>
> Injection-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2018 05:07:23 +0000
> 
> And my first reply was a week later:
> 
> On Monday, March 12, 2018 at 2:38:00 PM UTC-4, Edward Prochak wrote:
>> On Monday, March 5, 2018 at 12:07:26 AM UTC-5, James McGinn wrote:
>>> I have a more technical explanation that has to do with symmetry
>>> and stretched electron clouds.  Give me 2 weeks.
>>>
>>
>> One week gone already. This should be good. (snicker)
>> Ed
> 
> So much for making your self-imposed due date.
> Ed
> 

he's been posting about it since 2014, wrote 2 or 3 books on it (course
the books had different titles, but same squirrely text inside, [science
imagination]), and gave a huge public lecture on it to some poor schmuck
that got there, one,  in kalifornia.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Response to Arindham; By James McGinn Atmospheric Physicist and top expert on water in the atmosphere Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2018-04-16 00:18 -0700
  Re: Response to Arindham; By James McGinn Atmospheric Physicist and top expert on water in the atmosphere James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-04-16 10:08 -0700
  Re: Response to Arindham; By James McGinn Atmospheric Physicist and top expert on water in the atmosphere James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-04-20 13:45 -0700
    Re: Response to Arindham; By James McGinn Atmospheric Physicist and top expert on water in the atmosphere Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-04-23 10:08 -0700
      Re: Response to Arindham; By James McGinn Atmospheric Physicist and top expert on water in the atmosphere Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-23 15:24 -0500
        Re: Response to Arindham; By James McGinn Atmospheric Physicist and top expert on water in the atmosphere James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-04-23 14:40 -0700
        Re: Response to Arindham; By James McGinn Atmospheric Physicist and top expert on water in the atmosphere James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-04-23 23:58 -0700
          Re: Response to Arindham; By James McGinn Atmospheric Physicist and top expert on water in the atmosphere pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-04-24 08:09 -0700
            Re: Response to Arindham; By James McGinn Atmospheric Physicist and top expert on water in the atmosphere James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-04-24 10:44 -0700
            Re: Response to Arindham; By James McGinn Atmospheric Physicist and top expert on water in the atmosphere James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-04-25 08:43 -0700

csiph-web