Re: Smokers are smarter, I say.

From	"James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics, alt.privacy.anon-server, comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.cellular-phone-tech
Subject	Re: Smokers are smarter, I say.
Date	2017-04-26 23:24 +0100
Organization	~
Message-ID	<op.yzbpvjszjs98qf@red.lan> (permalink)
References	(15 earlier) <octdgk$q3r$1@dont-email.me> <op.yyqs74d1js98qf@red.lan> <D517A49E.9F249%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <op.yywr9qa0js98qf@red.lan> <D51BCC82.A02E0%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>

Cross-posted to 6 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 22:00:34 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:

> On 4/18/17, 1:52 PM, in article op.yywr9qa0js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson
> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote:
>
>>>> In the UK, we call that the "Labour government".  Every time they get in
>>>> they
>>>> spend spend spend and increase the national debt, leaving the Conservative
>>>> party to clean up the mess with cuts, which Labour then says are "mean".
>>>
>>> In the US the economy does significantly better under Democrats. You can see
>>> this correlation in the legislative and executive branches. Democrats, while
>>> still paid for and beholden to the rich, at least do a somewhat better job.
>>
>> Is that right or left wing?
>
> It is them doing their job and representing those who elected them, not
> bribed them. Of course, overall, members of both parties follow the money:
>
>     <http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-echochambers-27074746>

Can't you answer my question?

-- 
Harry Carpenter at the Oxford-Cambridge boat race 1977 - "Ah, isn't that nice. The wife of the Cambridge President is kissing the Cox of the Oxford crew."

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-26 23:24 +0100
  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-26 16:37 -0700
    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-04 17:42 +0100
      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-04 10:39 -0700
        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-04 19:10 +0100
          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-04 11:22 -0700
            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-04 20:01 +0100
              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-04 12:19 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-04 20:38 +0100
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-04 12:45 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-04 21:48 +0100
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-04 14:34 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-05-04 17:40 -0400
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-04 22:52 +0100
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-04 16:10 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-04 15:25 -0700

csiph-web