Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #569697
| Newsgroups | alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Isaac Newton was a human being |
| References | (3 earlier) <599e5262-cd9a-47c4-8b01-8c939caf2dce@googlegroups.com> <2844a01f-df2d-4dec-8bc6-2cb7fb9c8032@googlegroups.com> <812d35e6-9a16-493d-8c96-9aafaa2b849d@googlegroups.com> <1fb29d91-282e-4c2d-ae65-8154a647c37b@googlegroups.com> <d60cbce44f2c2a3f55f1ca3776c201e3@dizum.com> |
| Date | 2016-04-11 10:26 -0400 |
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
| Organization | AUKTard Polizia |
| Message-ID | <op.yfree5vhtm21m2@benson.localhost> (permalink) |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 09:53:32 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> James 'Tardnado' McGinn, in
> <news:1fb29d91-282e-4c2d-ae65-8154a647c37b@googlegroups.com> did
> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>
>> FNVWe drop-kicked a retard. Again:
>
>>> On Saturday, April 9, 2016 at 5:14:51 PM UTC-7,
>>> James 'Tardnado' McGinn wrote:
>
>>>> On Saturday, April 9, 2016 at 2:23:51 PM UTC-7,
>>>> pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>>>>>>>> If you ever find evidence of cold steam let us know. In my
>>>>>>>> opinion, however, your time would be better spent looking
>>>>>>>> for the holy grail because there is at least an outside
>>>>>>>> chance that it actually exists.
>
>>>>>>> WTF is your definition of cold steam?
>
>>>>>> Surreal. Read the first post in this thread again, carefully.
>>>>>> Think deeply. Do research.
>
>>>>> Well, the first post in this thread is almost total hogwash,
>>>>> as the gaseous form of water (water vapor) is NOT liquid water,
>
>>>> Evidence?
>
>>>>> as virtually any actual physicist or chemist knows.
>
>>>> So, let me get this straight. You argument is base on what people you
>>>> don't
>>>> know say they know. Your argument is not based on an experiment that
>>>> I could
>>>> reproduce to reproduce their results. Right?
>
>>> Nilsson's study:
>>> <https://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw?t=2156>
>>> If water molecules are H bonded together, it's liquid water, James.
>>> Photon energy from electron orbital descent is dependent upon H
>>> bonding strength (given that it's an electrostatic bond), the stronger
>>> the H bond, the lower the photon energy. Nilsson measured a higher
>>> photon energy from electron orbital descent in gaseous-phase water
>>> than that of liquid-phase water. If it'd been liquid-phase water as
>>> you claim, the photon energy would have been identical to that of
>>> liquid-phase water. It wasn't, hence gaseous phase water is
>>> monomolecular with no H bonding.
>>>
>>> Water In The Gas Phase -
>>> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3350649/
>>> Not ab initio (which you stupidly call "ab initro" in your videos
>>> LOL)... direct measurement of monomolecular water in the gaseous
>>> phase. 16 referenced papers.
>>>
>>> Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research
>>> http://www.mpip-mainz.mpg.de/molecular_mechanism_of_water_evaporation
>>> Direct empirical observation of monomolecular evaporation.
>>>
>>> http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/6686/
>>> Active Long Path Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy to
>>> directly observe monomolecular gaseous-phase water in the atmosphere.
>>>
>>> Now you can run away from reality all over again, James. You
>>> delusional reality-denying kooktard.
>>>
>>> The experiments are above, in addition to the three experiments I've
>>> already suggested you try, James, which can be done by pretty much
>>> anyone without requiring sophisticated equipment.
>>>
>>> You've made an unusual claim that flies in the face of reality, the
>>> onus of proof is upon you. No one is required to hold your moronic
>>> hand and do the work for you. Test your suppositions, or reconcile
>>> yourself to the fact that you're practicing cargo cult 'science',
>>> James, and even then fucking it up badly.
>
>> Answer the question you evasive twit.
>
> Face reality, you delusional shitbag.
how ironic:
have you heard about the lotusLoser?
he's a loser but he still keeps on tryin'...
-
"People didn't cause the Great Depression, Liberal ko0kTarD. Governmental
policy did." - Fakey in MID <7880b90ad2ecebe35ba01b4557597d80%40dizum.com>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causes_of_the_Great_Depression
"The initial stock market crash triggered a "panic sell-off" that made the
stock market go even lower."
so... so the "government" panicked, snickers?
funny that a bona-fide conservative horatio alger hero type would want the
government stepping in to save the stock market.
"Current theories may be broadly classified into two main points of view
and several heterodox points of view.
First, there are demand-driven theories, from Keynesian and institutional
economists who argue that the depression was caused by a widespread loss
of confidence that led to underconsumption. The demand-driven theories
argue that the financial crisis following the 1929 crash led to a sudden
and persistent reduction in consumption and investment spending.[1] Once
panic and deflation set in, many people believed they could avoid further
losses by keeping clear of the markets. Holding money therefore became
profitable as prices dropped lower and a given amount of money bought ever
more goods, exacerbating the drop in demand.
Second, there are the monetarists, who believe that the Great Depression
started as an ordinary recession, but that significant policy mistakes by
monetary authorities (especially the Federal Reserve), caused a shrinking
of the money supply which greatly exacerbated the economic situation,
causing a recession to descend into the Great Depression. Related to this
explanation are those who point to debt deflation causing those who borrow
to owe ever more in real terms."
wait? what? no major "third" konservative k0okTheory blaming the
government for everything mentioned?
odd, that. eh, lotusLoser?
-
the never-ending saga of fakey's "lotus"...
https://web.archive.org/web/20160408001051/http://i.imgur.com/e3OrQSq.png
-
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu
-
FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>
">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking
*moron*?
"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""
it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. it says that you're in denial
about the inversion of your AC legs.
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png
http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf
on page 2:
** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)
*COUGH*
SPNAK!!
-
i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII
art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>
-
snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:
- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:
http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html
place those files in a directory and save this file as
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.
compiles with:
gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++
run with:
./a.out
enjoy the LULZ ;)
*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>
using namespace std;
int main(){
//float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);
float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=float_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=float_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's
ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25); //
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =_float_table(_PI,25);
// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){
// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
+
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh
snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
}
t = t+STEP;
}
/*
Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"
Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves
never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.
That's how stupid you are.
Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"
Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when
summed.
the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.
*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
-
Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>
-
Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
<snicker>
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">
on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*
*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.
-
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
http://cafepress.com/kooktown
http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
-
If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
-
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd
-
Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:
$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!
(just as useful as the original!)
-
snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden
service. It's not rocket science.
_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a
kiddie pr0n network.)
That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
-
Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Isaac Newton was a human being James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 22:55 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-04-04 23:00 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 23:21 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 23:55 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 08:07 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-04-05 10:46 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 11:09 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-04-05 19:04 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-04-05 19:25 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 20:13 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-04-05 21:32 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 21:37 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-04-05 21:42 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-06 10:06 -0500
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-04-07 11:23 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 12:01 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-04-07 14:14 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 14:36 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-04-07 15:03 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 15:13 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-04-07 15:34 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 17:51 -0500
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 16:03 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-04-07 20:01 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 20:15 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-04-07 22:11 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 22:51 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 07:14 -0500
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 06:44 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 12:57 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 15:52 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-04-07 20:00 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 20:14 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-04-07 22:45 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 22:54 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 08:07 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-04-08 12:47 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 12:57 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-04-08 14:50 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 15:28 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-04-08 16:57 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 17:55 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-04-08 20:17 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 20:41 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-04-08 22:26 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 23:57 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 09:10 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-04-09 11:36 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 11:46 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-04-09 14:23 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 17:14 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-10 07:03 +0200
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-10 17:51 +0200
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 23:30 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 16:28 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-04-10 17:12 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 17:30 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-04-10 17:46 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 18:26 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-04-10 19:52 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-11 15:53 +0200
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-04-11 10:26 -0400
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 22:36 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 12:02 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-04-27 21:12 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 21:36 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-04-28 07:06 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-28 08:32 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-04-28 21:03 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-28 21:05 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 08:17 -0700
fiG Newton had no theory of light noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 21:31 -0700
newton had a false theory of light noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 14:00 -0700
no theory of light (corpuscular noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 07:56 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being Lu Wei <luweitest@address.invalid> - 2016-04-05 15:41 +0800
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 02:38 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-05 09:44 -0500
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 08:17 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 10:08 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 12:14 -0700
Re: Isaac Newton was a human being James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 10:09 -0700
csiph-web