Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #556022
| Newsgroups | alt.free.newsservers, alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: 3 phase teaser |
| References | (3 earlier) <8ae01a64e9f97aa0fa45a70bb6524ba9@dizum.com> <op.ydajo7pntm21m2@benson.localhost> <a62baf5af12890451dcfa54347d50323@dizum.com> <op.ydapcahftm21m2@benson.localhost> <d190270c37368b10eb3bb3e316c92bdb@dizum.com> |
| Date | 2016-02-23 16:56 -0500 |
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
| Organization | AUKTard Polizia |
| Message-ID | <op.yda27vrttm21m2@benson.localhost> (permalink) |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 16:45:33 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka > DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), > socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in > <news:op.ydapcahftm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first > into the wood chipper again: > >> On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 11:10:16 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood >> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > >>>>>> reconstructing the wye transformer's input signal: >>>>>> (phase A minus phase B minus phase C) >>>>>> sin(2*pi*60*x)*120- >>>>>> sin((2*pi*60*x+(120*pi)/180))*120- >>>>>> sin((2*pi*60*x+(240*pi)/180))*120 >>>>>> >>>>>> gnuplot> plot >>>>>> sin(2*pi*60*x)*120- >>>>>> sin((2*pi*60*x+(120*pi)/180))*120- >>>>>> sin((2*pi*60*x+(240*pi)/180))*120,240 >>>>>> http://i.imgur.com/o55uvkm.png > >>>>> So... you're saying that 120 volt legs combine in the wye transformer >>>>> to give 240 volts, eh? > >>>> no, fucktard. i'm saying that the input of the transformer is 240Vac >>>> from the line. > > "the input of the transformer is 240Vac from the line" LOL! > > What transformer, DildoRider? Your magical transformer that can > somehow deliver 120 volts from the 240 volt *primary* side, in > violation of Watt's Law? Your magical transformer that isn't even > needed because the electrical service is fed by 170 volt peak L-N, 120 > volt RMS L-N, 208 volt RMS L-L, and therefore the loads can be powered > directly, without your magical pixiedust transformer? > > SPNAK! > >>> Except that's not what you graphed. I quote you: >>> "reconstructing the wye transformer's *input* signal" >>> >>> Then you put 120 volts into your equations. >>> >>> And that's not even taking into account that it's not 240 VAC L-N, >>> which is RMS. You can't get 120v RMS from 240v RMS unless you use only >>> *two* legs of your magical transformer, Moron. >>> >>> The 3-phase power is fed from a 170 volt peak, 120 volt RMS L-N >>> supply, and the 208 volts is tapped off of any two legs, Moron. >>> >>> But nicely backpedaled. > > <crickets> LOL! > > SPNAK! > >>>>> It's apparent that you have no idea how a 3-phase transformer works, >>>>> nor do you have any idea how to calculate 3-phase voltages via the >>>>> Euler sinewave summation equation, DildoRider. > >>>> and yet, the only thing you've tried to "correct" is your >>>> misunderstanding >>>> of how a wye transformer splits 240Vac into 3 120Vac signals. > >>> Wrong. LOL >>> >>> The input side of the transformer is 170v peak, 120v RMS, 3-phase L-N. >>> 208.207 volt RMS L-L, Moron. >>> >>> But nicely backpedaled. > > <crickets> LOL! > > SPNAK! > >>>> you'd likely be baffled if someone took a wye transformer and >>>> connected >>>> the 3 hot legs to the output of a 3-phase generator and then got >>>> 240Vac >>>> out of the transformer's other winding. pretty sure that you have no >>>> idea how a transformer works. > >>> Fanfic from the moron who just demonstrated for a potential 8 billion >>> people that he doesn't know jack-shit about how a 3-phase 120/208 volt >>> electrical system, the most ubiquitous electrical system in North >>> America, works. And you demonstrated yet again that you're a math >>> challenged moron. > > <crickets> LOL! > > SPNAK! > >>>>> The peak voltage is divided by SQRT(2) to get RMS: >>>>> 678 / SQRT(2) = 480 >>>>> 480 / SQRT(2) = 339 >>>>> 339 / SQRT(2) = 240 >>>>> 240 / SQRT(2) = 170 >>>>> 170 / SQRT(2) = 120 >>>>> >>>>> The L-N voltage is divided by SQRT(3): >>>>> 480 / SQRT(3) = 277 <== commercial and industrial lighting voltage >>>>> >>>>> The L-L voltage is multiplied by SQRT(3): 120 * SQRT(3) = 208 >>>>> >>>>> And you can't k'lame it's actually peak voltage you're calculating, >>>>> you show 120 volts in your equation, and L-L voltage is multiplied by >>>>> SQRT(3): 170 * SQRT(3) = 294v Peak >>>>> >>>>> So if you were calculating peak voltages, you'd arrive at 294 volts >>>>> peak. >>>>> >>>>> And: 294 / SQRT(2) = 208v RMS >>>>> >>>>> So no matter what, the equation ends up at 208v RMS volts from 120v >>>>> RMS (294v peak from 170v peak), not 240v. > >>>> no shit sherlock. i graphed the potential between 2 sets of legs. it >>>> was >>>> 208Vac. > >>> No, you graphed the "input" of the transformer as 240 volts RMS, you >>> just admitted it above, then you k'lamed you were getting 120 volts >>> RMS from that 240 volts RMS, an impossibility unless you only use >>> *two* legs of your magical transformer, Moron. > > <crickets> LOL! > > SPNAK! > >>>> you're simply going on here about your inability to conceive that a >>>> wye >>>> transformer is connected to a 240Vac source. > >>> No, a 120/208 volt electrical supply, the most ubiquitous electrical >>> supply in all of North America, is fed by 3-phase 170 volt peak, >>> 120.207 volt RMS L-N, and the 208.207 volt RMS L-L is achieved by >>> tapping across any two hot legs, Moron. > > <crickets> LOL! > > SPNAK! > >>>>> So you'll be getting right on describing exactly how your magical >>>>> 3-phase transformer is converting 120 volts to 240 volts, DildoRider. > >>>> it converts 240 volts AC to three 120V 120 degree phase shifted >>>> signals. > >>> Wrong. You'll be showing your math on that. This should be good. >>> Moron. > > <crickets> LOL! > > SPNAK! > >>>> if you connect three 120V 120 degree phase shifted INPUT signals on >>>> the >>>> typical "output" side, however, you'll see 240Vac out the other >>>> winding. > >>> "120V 120 degree phase shifted INPUT signals"? >>> >>> You just said above that the input was 240 volts RMS L-N and you were >>> getting 120 volts RMS L-N from that, an utter impossibility, Moron. >>> >>> But nicely backpedaled. > > <crickets> LOL! > > SPNAK! > >>>> DUMBASS. > >>> Wrong. Get to showing your math showing how your magical transformer >>> can achieve 120 volts RMS L-N from 240 volts RMS L-N, Moron. > >> perhaps you can show the math that shows how 240Vac is split into three >> 120V 120 degree phase shifted signals. i did. > > No, you didn't. You spewed a bunch of mathematical moronism, got > caught being a retard, backpedaled and k'lamed you were talking about > the primary and that the primary was fed by 240 volts, and you were > deriving that 120 volts off the *primary* side of the transformer. And > you did it all while violating Watt's Law. > > And that's not even considering that a 120/208 volt system *isn't* fed > by 240 volts, it's fed by 170 volt peak L-N, 120 volt RMS L-N, 208 > volt RMS L-L. So there's usually not even any need for a transformer, > as most loads are powered directly from L-N at 120 volts and L-L at > 208 volts. Backpedaling moron. > > SPNAK! > >>>>> Also, if the Euler sinewave summation equation is changed to >>>>> subtraction and applied to two hot legs, it arrives at 208 volts from >>>>> 170 volts... you're inputting a peak voltage and arriving at an RMS >>>>> voltage. In reality, 208 volts RMS can only be achieved by >>>>> multiplying >>>>> 120 volts RMS * SQRT(2), thus the sinewave summation equation is the >>>>> equation to use. >>>>> >>>>> <http://i.imgur.com/1WLIvfn.png> >>>>> <http://i.imgur.com/76PX0PP.png> >>>>> >>>>> SPNAK! >>>>> >>>>> Here's the proper way to do it: >>>>> <http://i.imgur.com/NrZzxlb.png> >>>>> >>>>> 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N on each hot leg, converts to >>>>> 208.207 volt RMS L-L. > >>>> looks like my graph is correct, then. > >>> Wrong. You failed to show how your kooky sinewave subtraction equation >>> converted any of those voltages, you just graphed the voltages >>> directly. > >> imagine the convenience of that, fakey. i also got correct sinewave >> plots >> out of it. > > No, you didn't. Your kooky sinewave subtraction equation violates > Watt's Law, you're k'laming to have derived 120 volts directly from > the 240 volt primary side of a transformer, you're k'laming that a > 120/208 volt system is fed by 240 volts when it's actually fed by 170 > volt peak L-N, 120 volt RMS L-N, 208 volt RMS L-L, and there is no > need for a transformer. Likely because you're a backpedaling > mathematical moron. > > SPNAK! > >> it took you about 3 weeks to catch up and you've not once demonstrated >> HOW >> you are graphing anything, so i see no reason to. > > You were never ahead, DildoRider. I was just giving you line to run. > Now the hook is set, and the more you flop and flail, the more you > prove yourself to be a mathematical moron. > > SPNAK! > >>> On top of that, you fucked up and k'lamed that 170 volt >>> peak, 120 volt RMS L-N can create 240 volt RMS, and that's just utter >>> bullshit. Show your math, Moron. > >> if you backfed three 120V 120 degree phase shifted signals through that >> wye transformer's secondaries, you would see 240Vac at the primary >> winding. >> >> or were you not quite so sure how a transformer fundamentally works? > > "backfed three 120V 120 degree phase shifted signals through that wye > transformer's secondaries" LOL! > > Backfed it from *where*, you fucking nong? From the *loads*? Bwahahaa! > > You fucking idiot, there's no transformer required, it's 120/208 volt > being fed, so 120 volt loads are powered directly via L-N and 208 volt > loads are powered directly from L-L. > > SPNAK! on the backpedaling mathematical moron as he writhes to get out > of his kooky demonstration that he can't do simple Euler sinewave > summation, and k'lames he can magically violate Watt's Law. > >>>>> Educate yourself, you moron: >>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8O2FwSCk_Yo> >>>>> "When 208v power comes into your park, it'll come in over 3 hot >>>>> wires, >>>>> plus the neutral. If you measure from one hot wire to neutral, it >>>>> will >>>>> be 120 volts, but if you measure from one hot wire to a second hot >>>>> wire, it will be 208 volts." > >>>> looks like my graph is correct then. three 120v hots. 208 volts hot >>>> to >>>> hot between A-B and B-C. i left out A-C as an exercise for the >>>> sinewave >>>> addled reader. > >>> Wrong. You k'lamed your kooky sinewave subtraction program fed 170 >>> volts peak, 120 volts RMS L-N to arrive at 240 volts RMS, another > >> no, i showed that 240Vac on the wye primary produces three 120V 120 >> degree >> phase shifted signals. > > What "primary", you fucking moron? The most ubiquitous electrical > service is 120/208 3-phase. The 120 volt loads are powered directly > off the line via L-N, the 208 volt loads are powered directly off the > line via L-L, no transformer required. > > Now, how is your magical "transformer" that shouldn't even be there > violating Watt's Law and deriving 120 volts off your k'lamed 240 volts > on the *primary* side, you backpedaling *moron*. > > SPNAK! > >> where do you think the power to supply three 120V phases came from, >> idjit? did you think that transformers were stand-alone power sources >> like batteries, or something k0oky like that? > > Good gawd you're a fucking idiot. Do you suppose every fucking > business that has 120/208 volt service has a transformer tucked away > somewhere? Keep digging that stupidity hole, DildoRider. > > SPNAK! > >>> physical impossibility. 208 volts RMS L-L is created from the 120 >>> volts RMS L-N, Moron. > >> not only am i aware of that, i graphed that weeks before you caught up >> to >> the discussion in this thread right after your sinewave stew meltdown, >> where you demonstrated that you are incapable of proving that your stew >> ever summed to 2550.25 volts as you had k0okily klamed by incorrectly >> using your "euler summations". > > I said I was using the total sum of the six sinewave's voltages as a > quick acid test to determine whether your kooky sinewave subtraction > equation was even in the ballpark. It wasn't, it isn't. It violates > Watt's Law and gives you fucked up answers like deriving 120 volts > from 240 volts on the *primary* side of a transformer that shouldn't > even be there because 120/208 service isn't fed by 480 volts, it's fed > by 170 volt peak L-N, 120 volt RMS L-N with 208 volt RMS L-L and > therefore the loads are powered directly from the 120 volt RMS L-N and > the 208 volt RMS L-L. > > SPNAK! > >>> But nicely backpedaled. > >> nicely projected, spankard. > > Nicely backpedaled again, Spankard. I proved your kooky sinewave > subtraction equation violates Watt's Law and therefore *cannot* work. > > SPNAK! > >>>>> So the *only* way you can get 240 volts out of a transformer supplied >>>>> with 3-phase 120v RMS (170v peak) is to use only *two* of the 120v >>>>> RMS >>>>> (170v peak) legs L-N. Not all three. Thus your kooky sinewave >>>>> subtraction equation *FAILS*. > >>>> wrong. to get 240V out of a wye tranformer, all you have to do is >>>> apply >>>> three 120 degree phase shifted 120V signals to the secondaries. > >>> Wrong. Show your math, Moron. > >> i just did and you intentionally confused it with L-L voltage. > > You're the moron k'laming that you're feeding a magical transformer > with 240 volts to power a 120/208 system, and that you can conjure up > 120 volts directly from that 240 volts on the *primary* side of that > transformer, in direct violation of Watt's Law. The only one confused > is *you*, Moron. > > Show your math, Moron. > > SPNAK! > >> show me what a 240Vac input into a the primary of the wye transformer >> that >> we are discussing produces, nitwit. > > What transformer is there for a 120/208 volt service, DildoRider? Do > you suppose the loads are all powered through your magical 240 volt > primary transformer that gives you 120 volts on the *primary* side, in > violation of Watt's Law *and* common sense? > > I'd tell you to put the crack pipe down, but we both know you won't, > Cracky McCrackHead. > > SPNAK! > >> show your math, BTW. LOL > > I have no need. It's *you* who's made the k'lame that 120/208 volt > service is somehow fed via a 240 volt primary magical transformer that > can deliver 120 volts on the *primary* side, in direct contradiction > to the reality of a 120/208 volt system being fed with 170 volt peak > L-N, 120 volt RMS L-N, 208 volt RMS L-L, thus powering the 120 and 208 > volt loads directly, no magical transformer that can violate Watt's > Law required. > > SPNAK! > >>> SPNAK! > >>>> did nobody tell you that transformers work in both directions? > >>> Did anybody tell you you're a math challenged moron? > >> did you just say that because you don't want to admit that you were >> completely unaware that most transformers can be back-fed? > > What transformer, DildoRider? Your magical transformer that can > somehow deliver 120 volts from the 240 volt *primary* side, in > violation of Watt's Law? Your magical transformer that isn't even > needed because the electrical service is 170 volt peak L-N, 120 volt > RMS L-N, 208 volt RMS L-L, and therefore the loads can be powered > directly, without your magical pixiedust transformer? > > SPNAK! > >>>>>> i wonder why fakey's graphs are borken? > >>>>> They're not. Yours are. Moron. > >> perhaps you can share the full equations that you are graphing and we >> can >> get down to the business of determining how you fucked up? > > Sure... it's the Euler equation. Go find it, I didn't change anything. > It's only been in use since the 1800s by every scientist and engineer. > That you can't figure it out is no one's fault but your own. Moron. > > SPNAK! > >> or... you could always correct any mistakes that you think i've made. > > Where to start? Your entire wall of blather you've been spewing for > the past month is one huge mistake. You haven't gotten one fucking > thing right. Moron. > >> hopefully we've cleared up that the input of the transformer can be >> calculated and graphed by: >> phase A minus phase B minus phase C. > > What transformer, DildoRider? Your magical transformer that can > deliver 120 volts directly from 240 volts on the *primary* side of > your magical transformer, in direct violation of Watt's Law? The > transformer that isn't even needed because the "primary" isn't fed by > 240 volts, it's fed by 170 volt peak L-N, 120 volt RMS L-N, 208 volt > RMS L-L, so the loads can be powered directly, no need for retarded > magical transformers that violate Watt's Law. > > SPNAK! > >> of course, we're all ignoring negligible losses here due to heat, >> otherwise even your graph would probably look different. > > Moron. LOL > >>>>>> perhaps he's making things more complicated with his furry >>>>>> transformers? >>>>>> i wonder if he'll ever explain why subtraction (not addition) is >>>>>> used >>>>>> to determine voltage potentials? > >> ??? no? > > Moron. LOL > >>>>> Perhaps you're a mathematical moron. > > Fag. LOL > Idiot. LOL > Moron. LOL > Tranny. LOL > Libtard. LOL > Crackhead. LOL > GableTard. LOL > DildoRider. LOL > Bad Musician. LOL > Stick Figure. LOL > Terrible Liar. LOL > Sinewave Spammer. LOL > Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL > Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL > Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL > Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL > Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL > Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL > Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL > are you going to continue bleating for the rest of the night? -- "sines, sines, everywhere there's sines blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind" http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu - FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID: <3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com> ">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics >> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all: >> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) >> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) >> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time: >> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x) Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking *moron*? "The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:"" it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/ http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png "To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each other:" http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf on page 2: ** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A) *COUGH* SPNAK!! - i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII art if you ask nicely. see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com> - Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to: "all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..." <f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com> - On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: <snicker> Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL is where my usenet lord and mas-ter can go straight to hell* *hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening. - http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg http://cafepress.com/kooktown http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg - If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :) - if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try: http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2 - http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written, Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd - Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!: $ perl fakeyBot.pl FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you, look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker> You> Robert Michael Wolfe FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks, Robert. <snicker> Robert> you talk about cocks a lot. FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot? Robert> gay sex, mostly... FakeyBot> Fag! (just as useful as the original!) - snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message <b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>: "That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden service. It's not rocket science. _The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my distinct impression was that the "anonymity research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a kiddie pr0n network.) That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation Onymous was just icing on the cake." - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-17 06:17 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 00:40 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-17 18:30 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-17 12:55 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 07:20 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 09:45 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 07:58 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 10:17 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-19 03:27 +0800
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 15:03 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 05:20 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-20 22:37 +0800
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 20:10 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-20 15:22 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 06:09 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-20 23:19 +0800
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 08:47 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-20 09:51 -0800
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 10:55 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-20 11:00 -0800
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 12:38 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 20:05 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 12:38 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-20 22:05 +0000
Re: 3 phase teaser Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-21 14:23 +0800
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 06:45 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-22 16:15 +0800
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 20:01 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-23 03:42 +0800
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-22 15:42 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 07:27 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-23 01:27 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 09:55 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-23 09:54 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 17:10 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-23 11:56 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 22:45 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-23 16:56 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-24 06:38 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-27 02:14 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-26 23:50 -0800
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-27 20:28 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-27 12:53 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-28 02:32 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-28 19:05 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 22:30 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-23 14:48 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-23 16:53 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 22:30 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-23 16:52 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-23 16:55 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-24 07:07 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-25 08:19 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-25 19:26 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-25 08:24 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-25 03:12 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-25 18:05 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-25 13:03 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-26 06:28 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-25 12:08 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-25 15:01 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-25 04:14 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-25 18:00 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-25 13:01 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-26 06:44 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 22:35 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-23 14:50 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-24 18:53 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-24 11:52 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-24 07:47 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-23 23:43 -0800
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-24 18:48 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-24 13:03 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-25 10:12 +0800
Re: 3 phase teaser "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-24 19:13 -0800
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-24 22:23 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-25 07:06 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 07:27 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-23 01:26 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-23 00:32 -0800
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 19:42 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-24 07:37 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 20:19 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 22:03 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 14:20 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 18:13 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 16:22 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 16:24 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 16:33 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 18:37 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-19 05:43 +0000
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-19 11:15 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-19 10:16 -0700
Re: 3 phase teaser "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-19 12:29 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 05:48 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-17 15:49 -0500
Re: 3 phase teaser "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-17 13:26 -0800
Re: 3 phase teaser Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 06:52 +0100
Re: 3 phase teaser Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-17 02:57 -0700
csiph-web