Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2)

Newsgroups	alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics
Subject	Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2)
References	(3 earlier) <ksOdncKcSKSgM0TInZ2dnUU7-QWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <mrnnv3$anq$1@pcls7.std.com> <su2dnbXIAZcF6ELInZ2dnUU7-S-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <op.x31r7kn2tm21m2@benson.localhost> <e01ed885a055f4f6646c537f0f965630@dizum.com>
Date	2015-08-28 13:54 -0400
From	"\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1>
Organization	AUKTard Polizia
Message-ID	<op.x33aoip9tm21m2@benson.localhost> (permalink)

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 00:31:37 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of
> 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as
> root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x31r7kn2tm21m2@benson.localhost> did
> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:
>
>> On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 16:39:11 -0400, Rocky (aka
>> Michael S. Guthrie of 6913 Maynard Road, Summerfield, NC)
>> <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>
>>> ROT<SMACKAKOOK!>
>
>> why do i also have the feeling that you are one of these people who
>> believe that the "government can't do anything right", except when some
>> hyper-complex conspiracy is involved.
>>
>> that would be as k0oky as denying what a majority of climate scientists
>> have to say about climate change.
>
> Or as kooky as believing a majority of scientists agree about
> something which they clearly don't:
>
> Klimate Katastrophe Kook K'lame #4: 97% of climate experts agree
> humans are causing global warming
>
> SPNAK! #4
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> The "97% of climate scientists agree" is an outright lie:
> Message-ID: <c407c7d08fb6911ec5f4f90971e41c78@dizum.com>
> =========================================================
> The LibTard environmental whackadoodles keep bleating about "97%
> of climate scientists agree that global warming is human
> caused!".
>
> Where did this 97% figure come from?
>
> When you explore its lineage, it turns out to be about as
> convincing as a Chicago election. The most prominent form of it
> comes from a professor in Australia named John Cook at the
> University of Queensland.
>
> What Cook's study purported to do was to review the abstracts
> (not the entire papers, just the abstracts) of 11,000 climate
> science articles.
>
> But when you read the first paragraph of Cook's abstract for his
> study, it says, "We find that 66.4% of abstracts expressed no
> position on anthropogenic global warming, 32.6% endorsed
> anthropogenic global warming, 0.7% rejected it, and 0.3% were
> uncertain."
>
> That means only 1/3 of those papers had an opinion on
> human-caused global warming. The next sentence in Cook's abstract
> for his study says, "Among abstracts expressing a position on
> human-caused global warming, 97.1% endorsed the consensus
> position that humans are causing the warming."
>
> 11000 * .326 = 3586 * .971 = 3482
> (3482 / 11000) * 100 = 31.65% of climate scientists agree that
> global warming is human-caused. And those 31.65% aren't even all
> "climate scientists"... a good majority of them are research
> assistants and college students who write the (non-peer reviewed)
> papers that the lead researchers (mainly associated with the IPCC
> and other politicized "scientific" entities) put their names on.
>
> But then, LibTard environmental whackadoodles are gullible and
> stupid... they can't pull their heads out of liberalism's ass
> long enough to do their own research, and even if they could,
> that hard math eludes them.
> =========================================================
>
> Doh! Stoooopid libtard *still* can't figure out that hard math. LOL
>

"stooopid libtard" can prove that james cook would tell you to take your  
global cooling myth and stuff it:

http://www.yaleclimateconnections.org/2010/12/skeptical-science-founder-john-cook/

"With an undergraduate education in physics from the University of  
Queensland and a post-graduate honors year studying solar physics, Cook  
says his interest in climate science was sparked when he was given a copy  
of a speech by Oklahoma Republican Senator James Inhofe, most known to  
climate professionals for having attached the “greatest hoax known to man”  
tag to anthropogenic climate change."

looks like you won't be able to use your "james cook" mythology anymore to  
try to back your k'lames that are unfounded and unpopular with climate  
scientists.  D'OH!!!

 from james cook's own website (LOL!):

https://www.skepticalscience.com/skeptic_James_Inhofe.htm

Climate Myth:	
"this 97% [of climate scientists accepting human-caused global warming],  
that doesn't mean anything. I named literally thousands of scientists on  
the floor...and these were top people."
14 March 2012 (Source)

What the Science Says:
97% of climate experts agree humans are causing global warming.

DOUBLE D'OH!!!

now, how's about you and your dreamt-up k0okyKonservative wignut klimate  
konspiracy theories frig right off?

-- 
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd


--

Thread

Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-27 19:21 +0000
  Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 15:39 -0500
    Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 14:05 -0700
    Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:10 +0000
    Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-27 18:17 -0400
      Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-28 06:31 +0200
        Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-28 13:54 -0400
          Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 04:42 +0200
            Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 04:09 +0000
              Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 18:12 +0200
              Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-31 03:17 -0400
                Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 14:17 -0700
            Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-31 03:16 -0400
              Re: Proof that snickerTurds can't quite grok logic WAS: Re: The FBI's report about 9/11/01 proves the box cutter bullshit was just bullshit (MM is BS 2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 17:17 +0200
        box cutters were not illegal, at that time noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 12:27 -0700

csiph-web