Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #648802
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Is there any direct evidence of dark matter and dark energy? |
| Date | 2017-09-05 20:17 +0000 |
| Organization | The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 |
| Message-ID | <oon0ob$978$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <92882c5b-312a-468c-b7e1-62ed2a9aff18@googlegroups.com> <oomh4j$4r1$1@pcls7.std.com> <67a8a989-3f3a-4323-9d0e-19a96c692c40@googlegroups.com> <oomlui$do4$1@pcls7.std.com> <9ca9f6ff-2b4f-46f9-be44-64f77ae0f19f@googlegroups.com> |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: >MM >"- show quoted text - >Which was the problem. The galaxies were too heavy, compared to the visible >mass. But that tells us that we only need X amount of unknown stuff in them. >See how simple DM is? " >Or your theory of Gravity is backwards, As Odd repeatedly told you, alternate possibilities are being looked at. However, the current model of gravity works so well, it would be a large (and unlikely) surprise to have to make a significant change to it. >which should have been apparent when Levi-Schumacher SPLASHED instead of going >right THROUGH that 'gas giant', Jupiter. Say what? Comet S-L broke into pieces during a previous close encounter with Jupiter (it went within the Roche Limit) so when it impacted, it was multiple bodies. There was a line of black marks. Why would you think *anything* could go through Jupiter? Jupiter is HUGE and there's a lot of dense gas between any two parts of it. Also, because Jupiter's gravity is so strong, anything approaching it will be going VERY fast and with all that energy, will burn right up. (most meteors striking mere Earth burn up) >But you can't cure stupid. Yes, you prove yourself incurable daily, don't you.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is there any direct evidence of dark matter and dark energy? alal65536@gmail.com - 2017-09-04 04:24 -0700
Re: Is there any direct evidence of dark matter and dark energy? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-04 13:23 +0000
Re: Is there any direct evidence of dark matter and dark energy? alal65536@gmail.com - 2017-09-04 06:41 -0700
Re: Is there any direct evidence of dark matter and dark energy? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-04 14:44 -0500
Re: Is there any direct evidence of dark matter and dark energy? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-04 12:52 -0700
Re: Is there any direct evidence of dark matter and dark energy? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-05 00:26 +0000
Re: Is there any direct evidence of dark matter and dark energy? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-09-05 15:50 +0000
Re: Is there any direct evidence of dark matter and dark energy? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-05 09:56 -0700
Re: Is there any direct evidence of dark matter and dark energy? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-09-05 17:12 +0000
Re: Is there any direct evidence of dark matter and dark energy? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-05 12:37 -0700
Re: Is there any direct evidence of dark matter and dark energy? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-09-05 20:17 +0000
Re: Is there any direct evidence of dark matter and dark energy? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-06 08:38 -0500
Re: Is there any direct evidence of dark matter and dark energy? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-06 09:12 -0700
Re: Is there any direct evidence of dark matter and dark energy? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-06 12:49 -0500
Re: Is there any direct evidence of dark matter and dark energy? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-09-06 19:08 +0000
Re: Is there any direct evidence of dark matter and dark energy? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-06 14:20 -0500
Re: Is there any direct evidence of dark matter and dark energy? Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-09-06 14:24 -0500
Re: Is there any direct evidence of dark matter and dark energy? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-06 12:27 -0700
Re: Is there any direct evidence of dark matter and dark energy? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-06 14:49 -0500
Re: Is there any direct evidence of dark matter and dark energy? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-06 15:00 -0500
Re: Is there any direct evidence of dark matter and dark energy? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-09-07 19:51 +0000
Re: The British use the word "dark" when they mean "unseen". pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-09-04 18:03 -0700
Re: Is there any direct evidence of dark matter and dark energy? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-09-06 06:26 -0700
Re: Is there any direct evidence of dark matter and dark energy? alal65536@gmail.com - 2017-09-06 22:08 -0700
Re: Is there any direct evidence of dark matter and dark energy? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-09-07 15:25 -0500
Re: Is there any direct evidence of dark matter and dark energy? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-09-08 08:47 -0700
Re: Christianity is wrong, but useful. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-09-11 18:08 -0400
Re: Christianity is wrong, but useful. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-09-12 14:15 +0000
Re: Christianity is wrong, but useful. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-09-12 07:39 -0700
Re: Is there any direct evidence of dark matter and dark energy? Simon Roberts <retenshun@gmail.com> - 2017-09-07 09:28 -0700
Re: Is there any direct evidence of dark matter and dark energy? Simon Roberts <retenshun@gmail.com> - 2017-09-07 09:35 -0700
Re: Is there any direct evidence of dark matter and dark energy? "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-09-07 09:32 -0700
csiph-web