Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #522401
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. DoW #10" <greghall@yacht_master.fake> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, alt.usenet.kooks |
| Subject | Re: The Circlon theory, explained |
| Date | 2015-09-20 20:19 -0400 |
| Organization | Overqualified for MENSA |
| Message-ID | <ofiuvad94ui930dgsi43e723ljsh986433@4ax.com> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <1mb2l4l.1ic8jmcqnl7kiN%snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk> <chine.bleu-722C06.16344620092015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> <1mb2q54.1iykwk410ymfmeN%snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk> <jnhuva9r4a3rictrf2prv931vbjgnbin6f@4ax.com> <1mb2qot.1h8fo3z1vu94zqN%snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 01:01:00 +0100, snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) wrote: >Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. DoW #10 <greghall@yacht_master.fake> wrote: > >[...] > >> >In the end, everything boils down to relationships. >> >Symbols are merely an attempt at describing them. > ^^ ^^^^^^^ >Noun, not verb. A non sequitur, my dear sir. Typing *an attempt at* is colloquial spoken English at best. Noun or verb, an attempt to is more correct English than an attempt at. Why type *an attempt at describing* when an *attempt to describe* is more succinct, expeditious and enlightening? It's a matter of the more correct alternative. >> >> Attempt to describe them would have been better. You >> see, Old Bean, one generally attempts to rather than > ^^^^^^^^ ^^ >The verb form. See above. >> attempts at. >> >> >The above is a Sn!pe Profundanity; rather a prime example >> >thereof too, even though I say so myself. >> >> Agreed, but it would have been more profound with >> the use of proper grammar. >> >> >I'd like to see Mr Overqualified For Mensa do half as well. >> >> I think I just did. LOL! >> > >Hahah. Think that if it makes you happy. It gives me a great deal of happiness to not only think but know that I have smacked you down. See also: https://www.englishforums.com/English/AttemptToVsAttemptAt/wzrwh/post.htm -- Sir Gregory
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The Circlon theory, explained "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 10:44 -0700
Re: The Circlon theory, explained Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-20 12:33 -0700
Re: The Circlon theory, explained snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-09-20 22:01 +0100
Re: The Circlon theory, explained Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-20 14:02 -0700
Re: The Circlon theory, explained snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-09-20 22:08 +0100
Re: The Circlon theory, explained Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-20 14:49 -0700
Re: The Circlon theory, explained "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-20 17:11 -0400
Re: The Circlon theory, explained "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-20 14:57 -0700
Re: The Circlon theory, explained "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. DoW #10" <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-20 17:10 -0400
Re: The Circlon theory, explained snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-09-20 22:19 +0100
Re: The Circlon theory, explained "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. DoW #10" <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-20 18:08 -0400
Re: The Circlon theory, explained snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-09-20 23:12 +0100
Re: The Circlon theory, explained "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-20 18:32 -0400
Re: The Circlon theory, explained Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 14:31 -0700
Re: The Circlon theory, explained "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 00:54 -0700
Re: The Circlon theory, explained "Kurt Smith" <invalid@example.com> - 2015-09-21 07:41 -0700
Re: The Circlon theory, explained Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 13:20 -0700
Re: The Circlon theory, explained "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 21:55 -0700
Re: The Circlon theory, explained Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 10:33 -0700
Re: The Circlon theory, explained "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 11:47 -0700
Re: The Circlon theory, explained "Mapihal" <invalid@example.com> - 2015-09-22 23:36 -0700
Re: The Circlon theory, explained "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 02:43 -0700
Re: The Circlon theory, explained Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 08:16 -0700
Re: The Circlon theory, explained "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 08:33 -0700
Re: The Circlon theory, explained Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 09:38 -0700
Re: The Circlon theory, explained "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 23:38 -0700
Re: The Circlon theory, explained Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-09-24 16:40 -0700
Re: The Circlon theory, explained "Buck Futter" <invalid@example.com> - 2015-09-25 07:24 -0700
canonical curvature & intrinsical noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 18:16 -0700
Re: canonical curvature & intrinsical "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-09-26 00:50 -0700
*mathematica is four subjects at mimimum noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-26 17:24 -0700
not including arithmetic, *mathematica is four subjects at mimimum noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-26 17:51 -0700
Re: *mathematica is four subjects at mimimum "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-09-26 22:29 -0700
logic, grammar, rhetoric noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-27 15:55 -0700
Re: The Circlon theory, explained "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 08:39 -0700
Re: The Circlon theory, explained Nomen Nesco <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-23 13:16 -0500
Re: The Circlon theory, explained "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 23:20 -0700
Re: The Circlon theory, explained "Chet Smith" <invalid@example.com> - 2015-09-22 17:38 -0700
Re: The Circlon theory, explained "Burt Smith" <invalid@example.com> - 2015-09-21 07:39 -0700
Re: The Circlon theory, explained Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-20 14:47 -0700
Re: The Circlon theory, explained snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-09-20 23:01 +0100
Re: The Circlon theory, explained Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-20 16:34 -0700
Re: The Circlon theory, explained snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-09-21 00:51 +0100
Re: The Circlon theory, explained "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. DoW #10" <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-20 19:57 -0400
Re: The Circlon theory, explained snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-09-21 01:01 +0100
Re: The Circlon theory, explained "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. DoW #10" <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-20 20:19 -0400
Re: The Circlon theory, explained snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-09-22 08:37 +0100
Re: The Circlon theory, explained "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-20 21:32 -0700
Re: The Circlon theory, explained "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. DoW #10" <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-20 18:15 -0400
Re: The Circlon theory, explained R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2015-09-21 00:39 +0000
Re: The Circlon theory, explained 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2015-09-20 21:04 +0100
Re: The Circlon theory, explained Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-20 14:33 -0700
Re: The Circlon theory, explained "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-20 14:42 -0700
Re: The Circlon theory, explained Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-21 17:31 +0200
Re: The Circlon theory, explained "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 08:21 -0700
Re: The Circlon theory, explained "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 04:04 -0700
Re: The Circlon theory, explained "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-20 14:12 -0700
Re: The Circlon theory, explained "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 04:23 -0700
csiph-web