Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #633114

Re: Cherenkov radiation better explained by gamma ray = e- + e+

Show all headers | View raw

Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> writes:

>On Friday, May 12, 2017 at 5:51:02 PM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>> Also, there should have been a 4th radioactive decay emitter
>> 1) helium nuclei
>> 2) electron
>> 3) gamma = electron+positron
>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>How many times do you have to be told this is false?

>Man you are one stubborn dude.

That's how he operates. He's been doing that for years and years.

First he'll ask a science question, or speculate somehow.  Sometimes
normal, sometimes bizarre.

He may get responses, frequently telling him his speculation is wrong or
answer his question (frequently "no"). Some may try to give more details.

He may or may not acknowledge replies but he'll ignore the answer given
(unless it's affirmative).  He'll ask the same question in a different way
or ask questions about details that would support his speculation.

He'll write more (mostly talking to himself), and as time goes on he
becomes more and more convinced of the truthfulness of his speculation.
If people tell him he's wrong, he'll either ignore them (like he ignored
you), or he'll insult them, saying they're not using logic or they're
failures of physics.

He'll write more, making his speculation sound more and more true until he
states it's an established fact.  He'll change other facts (alternative
facts, anyone?) to support his claims (like saying spiral galaxies show
solid body rotation).

Shortly, he'll Proclaim a New Law or Discovery of Physics.  Just wait
about a week, he'll announce he has "discovered" that gamma rays are a
bound e+e- pair and x-rays are photons. And perhaps name the discovery
after himself. And insult anyone (as a failure in physics) that states his
new discovery/law is wrong. Just wait.

I've seen this pattern repeat many, many times over the years. He hates me
because I've pointed out where he's gone wrong many, many times over the
years.  He repeatedly insults me as an illogical failure of physics.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

3Question: Do all gamma photons, unlike X-ray photons have to come from inside nucleus// if so Gamma Barrier Principle Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-10 06:51 -0700
  Re: 3Question: Do all gamma photons, unlike X-ray photons have to come from inside nucleus// if so Gamma Barrier Principle Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-05-10 10:33 -0700
    Re: 3Question: Do all gamma photons, unlike X-ray photons have to come from inside nucleus// if so Gamma Barrier Principle Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-05-10 20:18 +0200
      Using Occam's Razor + Similarity, that the gamma ray is not a photon at all, but more like a beta particle // if so Gamma Barrier Principle Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-10 23:01 -0700
        How good are our machines//gamma ray is not a photon at all, but more like a beta particle // if so Gamma Barrier Principle Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-11 02:04 -0700
          easier experiment//gamma ray is not a photon at all, but more like a beta particle // if so Gamma Barrier Principle Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-11 04:05 -0700
            Re: easier experiment//gamma ray is not a photon at all, but more like a beta particle // if so Gamma Barrier Principle Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-11 05:09 -0700
              Re: ArchiePooh, the APe shit's gamma ray is not a photon at all "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-05-11 09:23 -0700
              Re: easier experiment//gamma ray is not a photon at all, but more like a beta particle // if so Gamma Barrier Principle Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-11 15:56 -0700
                Re: easier experiment//gamma ray is not a photon at all, but more like a beta particle // if so Gamma Barrier Principle "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-05-11 17:25 -0700
                Re: easier experiment//gamma ray is not a photon at all, but more like a beta particle // if so Gamma Barrier Principle Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-05-11 19:09 -0700
                Re: easier experiment//gamma ray is not a photon at all, but more like a beta particle // if so Gamma Barrier Principle benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-11 22:55 -0400
                Re: easier experiment//gamma ray is not a photon at all, but more like a beta particle // if so Gamma Barrier Principle Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-11 22:40 -0700
                Re: gamma ray is not a photon at all, but more like the APe shit face "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-05-11 22:57 -0700
                Re: easier experiment//gamma ray is not a photon at all, but more like a beta particle // if so Gamma Barrier Principle Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-12 01:18 -0700
                Re: easier experiment//gamma ray is not a photon at all, but more like a beta particle // if so Gamma Barrier Principle Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-05-12 11:01 +0200
                the smallest wavelength possible in physics// if so Gamma Barrier Principle Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-12 23:23 -0700
                Re: easier experiment//gamma ray is not a photon at all, but more like a beta particle // if so Gamma Barrier Principle Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-05-12 06:09 -0700
            gamma ray is not a photon at all wrong in APe shit's barren mind "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-05-11 09:27 -0700
        Re: Using Occam's Razor + Similarity, that the gamma ray is not a photon at all, but more like a beta particle // if so Gamma Barrier Principle Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-05-11 10:51 -0700
      Re: 3Question: Do all gamma photons, unlike X-ray photons have to come from inside nucleus// if so Gamma Barrier Principle Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-05-11 10:19 -0700
        Re: 3Question: Do all gamma photons, unlike X-ray photons have to come from inside nucleus// if so Gamma Barrier Principle Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-11 12:54 -0500
          Re: 3Question: Do all gamma photons, unlike X-ray photons have to come from inside nucleus// if so Gamma Barrier Principle benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-11 18:16 -0400
          Re: 3Question: Do all gamma photons, unlike X-ray photons have to come from inside nucleus// if so Gamma Barrier Principle Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-05-15 21:29 -0500
            Re: 3Question: Do all gamma photons, unlike X-ray photons have to come from inside nucleus// if so Gamma Barrier Principle Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-05-16 11:02 -0700
        Re: 3Question: Do all gamma photons, unlike X-ray photons have to come from inside nucleus// if so Gamma Barrier Principle Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-05-12 08:40 +0200
          Re: 3Question: Do all gamma photons, unlike X-ray photons have to come from inside nucleus// if so Gamma Barrier Principle Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-12 01:39 -0700
            Re: 3Question: Do all gamma photons, unlike X-ray photons have to come from inside nucleus// if so Gamma Barrier Principle Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2017-05-12 10:57 +0200
              proving gamma rays are not photons// if so Gamma Barrier Principle Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-12 23:09 -0700
            Cherenkov radiation better explained by gamma ray = e- + e+ Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-12 02:03 -0700
              Cherenkov radiation better explained by gamma ray = e- + e+ Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-12 03:25 -0700
                Cherenkov radiation better explained by gamma ray = e- + e+ Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-12 14:50 -0700
                Re: Cherenkov radiation better explained by gamma ray = e- + e+ benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-12 19:16 -0400
                Re: Cherenkov radiation better explained by gamma ray = e- + e+ Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2017-05-12 19:48 -0700
                Re: Cherenkov radiation better explained by gamma ray = e- + e+ moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-13 04:46 +0000
                Re: Cherenkov radiation better explained by gamma ray = e- + e+ moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-13 04:54 +0000
              Re: Cherenkov radiation better explained by gamma ray = e- + e+ moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-12 11:51 +0000
    Re: 3Question: Do all gamma photons, unlike X-ray photons have to come from inside nucleus// if so Gamma Barrier Principle poraty350@gmail.com - 2017-05-10 23:32 -0700

csiph-web