Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #616797
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: LIGO Conspirators: Wave or Money Catchers? |
| Date | 2017-02-03 09:37 -0600 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <o7282v$no9$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <956ae235-1f12-40cc-9fb4-9b243118a51f@googlegroups.com> <o723jj$f43$1@gioia.aioe.org> <0df95b44-bbb3-4170-9347-ec73e76e90f9@googlegroups.com> <o725t2$j8m$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ea6a2107-965d-4c3c-a118-c9245c5eaaff@googlegroups.com> |
On 2/3/2017 9:11 AM, john wrote: > Odd > No, you do not get to turn it around. > YOU justify your faith in grav waves. > > How do they work? > Alright. Gravitational waves work the way ALL waves work. There are physical laws that pertain to a physical system that take a particular mathematical form called a wave equation. What we know about physical systems that have this feature is that the solutions of the equation exhibit themselves as behaviors of the system. That is, since a traveling wave is a solution of the wave equation, then traveling waves appear physically in the system. This is the connection between physics and mathematics and why mathematics provides insight to how physical systems will behave. Please notice that this does not mean that mathematics is driving the explanation of how it works. What is driving the explanation of how it works are the laws of physics. But it's the FORM of the laws of physics that determines whether waves happen or not. I fully expect you to tell me that this does not meet your expectations. I expect you to claim that an explanation of how something works means taking it apart and showing all the parts inside and how they move and intermesh. But John, this just is not true. That's not how physics explains how things work, whether you like it or not. -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: LIGO Conspirators: Wave or Money Catchers? edprochak@gmail.com - 2017-02-02 10:07 -0800
Re: LIGO Conspirators: Wave or Money Catchers? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-02-02 12:20 -0600
Re: LIGO Conspirators: Wave or Money Catchers? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-02-03 05:59 -0800
Re: LIGO Conspirators: Wave or Money Catchers? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-02-03 08:20 -0600
Re: LIGO Conspirators: Wave or Money Catchers? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-02-03 06:57 -0800
Re: LIGO Conspirators: Wave or Money Catchers? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-02-03 08:59 -0600
Re: LIGO Conspirators: Wave or Money Catchers? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-02-03 07:11 -0800
Re: LIGO Conspirators: Wave or Money Catchers? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-02-03 09:37 -0600
Re: LIGO Conspirators: Wave or Money Catchers? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-02-03 07:40 -0800
Re: LIGO Conspirators: Wave or Money Catchers? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-02-03 09:44 -0600
Re: LIGO Conspirators: Wave or Money Catchers? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-02-03 10:04 -0600
Re: LIGO Conspirators: Wave or Money Catchers? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-02-07 09:15 -0800
Re: LIGO Conspirators: Wave or Money Catchers? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-02-07 11:22 -0600
csiph-web