Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #603138
| From | Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints |
| Date | 2016-10-31 14:10 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <nv84vm$j23$2@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (14 earlier) <e21277ec-6d4b-43cb-8524-19095c76e9a3@googlegroups.com> <7da54ea7-f3e9-4eae-baea-3b2c06341c80@googlegroups.com> <027ac507-9043-49cd-8d23-18ffc3f545e5@googlegroups.com> <eac59184-ab4b-4983-8631-e20210111ba6@googlegroups.com> <f53e948e-3daa-4414-b6df-6f13f34c74d3@googlegroups.com> |
On 8/14/2016 3:21 PM, Claudius the Dink wrote: > On Saturday, August 13, 2016 at 8:40:55 PM UTC-7, frank osborn > wrote: >> On Saturday, August 13, 2016 at 7:36:06 PM UTC-5, James McGinn >> wrote: >>> You looked at a picture and determine that the surface tension is >>> decreasing? I looked at the same picture and determined that the >>> relative surface tension is increasing. I'm not convinced that >>> the slumping isn't simply the result of the fact that in smaller >>> droplets the top of the droplet is closer to the surface. >>> >> Did you read the paper yet? > > Frank, what was the point of the paper. And how is it relevant to > James' hypothesis? You were asked this. Sergio was asked this. > Nobody gave an answer. > > Why do you think it is you can't explain its relevance? > > > You said your thoughts were just conjecture. >> >> >> What about Sergio's math ?; >>> Sergio >> what is the ratio of surface area (SA= 4*pi*r^2), to >>> volume of a sphere >> (V= 4/3*pi*r^3) ? ratio of surface to volume = >> (4*pi*r^2)/(4/3*pi*r^3) = 3/r >>> which *decreases* with smaller drop size.. >> >> >> James: > What the fuck are you talking about? You determined all >> of this from looking at pictures of microdroplets? >> >> Did you read the paper yet? It would be easier to discuss it if we >> both have read it. > > Go ahead, discuss it. What are you waiting for? > > >> >> Frank; > > and therefore humid air is, as basic science predicts, >> lighter than dry air. >>> >> >> James ; > Bull shit. You have nothing but your imagination to >> back this up. Show us the definitive evidence. >>> >> >> How about the periodic table of elements? And "not" ignoring liquid >> to gas, H2O gas will displace heaver gas per volume and be >> lighter? >> >> >> Frank;>> So H2O gas must add to the Hot/cold convection of air >> masses. >>> >> James;>> Absurd speculation. Prove it. >> >> Lighter gases are buoyant? Hot air rises and cold air sinks? > This is one fact. There are other factors at play here, such as > electrostatic forces. Right? > >> What about Sergio's math ?; >> >>> Sergio >> what is the ratio of surface area (SA= 4*pi*r^2), to >>> volume of a sphere >> (V= 4/3*pi*r^3) ? ratio of surface to volume = >> (4*pi*r^2)/(4/3*pi*r^3) = 3/r >>> which *decreases* with smaller drop size.. >> >> James: > What the fuck are you talking about? You determined all >> of this from looking at pictures of microdroplets?
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-31 14:10 -0500 Re: Amazon deletes James McGinn's Troll Book after bad complaints Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-11-02 09:47 -0500
csiph-web