Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #602254
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: New Physics |
| Date | 2016-10-24 01:06 +0000 |
| Organization | The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 |
| Message-ID | <nujmq5$69u$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink) |
| References | <bf35a074-2292-498d-a2b9-2194abdd3eb3@googlegroups.com> |
kenseto <setoken@att.net> writes: >1. No material or physical length contraction. >2. The light-path length of a moving meter stick is predicted to be >foreshortened by a factor of 1/gamma or lengthened by a factor of gamma. >These predictions are based on the assumptions that the light-path length >of the observer's meter stick is its material length. These conflict. Make up your mind, does length contraction exist or not? >3. Absolute time exists.....that means that time is not flexible (no >time dilation) as asserted by SR. However there is no clock time unit >(including a clock second) that represents the same amount of absolute >time in different frames. >4. The observer's clock second will represent a specific amount of absolute= > time (this is noted as a proper second by current physics). The observer p= >redicts that a clock second on a moving clock is worth 1/gamma seconds or = >gamma seconds on his clock clock. If you list multiple objects all moving relative to each other and assume this absolute time, you get contradictions as one or more of the objects would have to be simultaneously have more and less absolute time than a second one. No need to continue. We knew before that IRT was a total failure. Its inability to deal with these two issue just confirms its failure.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
New Physics kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-10-23 06:10 -0700
Re: New Physics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-10-24 01:06 +0000
Re: New Physics kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-10-24 06:54 -0700
Re: New Physics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-10-24 16:28 +0000
Re: New Physics Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2016-10-25 01:00 -0400
Re: New Physics kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-10-25 06:29 -0700
csiph-web