Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #600565

Re: Vortices in the subfractal

From moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Vortices in the subfractal
Date 2016-10-12 13:43 +0000
Organization The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989
Message-ID <ntlelg$2vj$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink)
References (20 earlier) <29510932-c598-4f08-aa0e-16121a874b08@googlegroups.com> <ns48sb$p86$1@gioia.aioe.org> <c2ed3e58-7db5-4b56-844d-a59dcef0fe09@googlegroups.com> <e6b95f18-5948-497d-952a-f3261935c5aa@googlegroups.com> <bdd63c49-269c-4b78-8f57-0d7fe6ca8289@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:

>Ed said
>"
>John's can claim it all he likes, but he has presented NO experimental 
>evidence of any internal structure for the electron. 
>"
>If a galaxy is the same as an atom,
>then such is a given.

Oh good grief. That isn't science. That is religion.  In science, every hypothesis is tested
against existing evidence to see if it matches reality, and then used to make a prediction
of something not yet seen.

>Then, one looks for evidence that
>galaxies precess,

Why?

> and there is plenty.
>The most promising is that galactic
>rotation curves are made by
>averaging data from opposite sides
>of the disc, because they have to-
>because they are assymetric.

No, light curves show rotation, but no evidence of precession.
No astronomer is going to be stupid enough to look for precession
without a real good reason.

>It should be trivial to not only prove
>that this is because the disc is
>precessing, but HOW FAST those
>discs are precessing.
>Wow.

And light curves show the "precession" as 1:0 as you put it.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Vortices in the subfractal edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-10-11 10:36 -0700
  Re: Vortices in the subfractal noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 12:35 -0700
  Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 12:43 -0700
    Re: Vortices in the subfractal moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-10-12 13:43 +0000
      Re: Vortices in the subfractal john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 07:55 -0700
        Re: Vortices in the subfractal noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 11:32 -0700
        Re: Vortices in the subfractal moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-10-13 15:28 +0000
          Re: Vortices in the subfractal noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-13 10:28 -0700
    Re: Vortices in the subfractal edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-10-13 08:30 -0700

csiph-web