Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #593363
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Show us your proof |
| Date | 2016-08-16 07:54 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <nov2ej$1mvb$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <f727df47-522b-4e75-bd32-91c99d3111c8@googlegroups.com> |
On 8/15/2016 11:10 PM, Claudius Denk wrote: > > On Monday, August 15, 2016 at 6:24:07 AM UTC-7, Sergio wrote: > >>>> Sure. You have yet to come up with a process that skips the gas >>>> phase and creates drops. >>> >>> Frank, you are starting to sound just as dumb as Sergio. >>> >>> McGinn has always been adamant about the fact that the gas phase >>> doesn't start until it acheives boiling, >> >> that is where McGinn is obviously wrong to anyone who knows science, and >> it brands him as a kook and a liar > > Uh, McGinn is right. If I don't have reproducible evidence then all I got is anecdote. And anecdote is worthless. > Liar. all you have is troll poop and lies. > >>> which is much higher than is >>> available in the atmosphere. You have to substantiate that there is >>> a gas phase at ambient temps >> >> no you do not. McGinn has to prove it. McGinn is posting as Denk. > > LOL. I have to prove my own position also, dumbass. Liar. You are just a dumb troll, who dosent know any high school algebra. > >>> before you go asking McGinn to explain >>> why he assumes there is not one. >> >> wrong, McGinn has to explain his theory, which he hasent done, because >> he cannot do it. > > LOL. Why are you so emotional about a theory that you claim has not been presented? Your imagination isn't evidence. Why are you so dominated by your imagination ? Can't think clearly ? Do people think you are f*cked up ? > > >>> Your imagination isn't evidence. >> >> it is McGinns imagination. >> >>> >>> You have to be much clearer on the distinction between what you >>> believe and what you know. >> >> >> which you are unable to do, McGinn Denk. > > You are the one making the fuss. Go ahead. Show us your proof. your spoof ? You have to be much clearer on the distinction between what you believe and what you know.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Show us your proof Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 21:10 -0700
Re: Show us your proof edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-08-16 05:37 -0700
Re: Show us your proof Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2016-08-17 22:07 -0700
Re: Show us your proof edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-08-18 10:44 -0700
Re: Show us your proof James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-08-18 11:28 -0700
Re: Show us your proof Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-16 07:54 -0500
Re: Show us your proof Gamma <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-16 11:47 -0500
Re: Show us your proof Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-18 18:51 -0500
Re: Show us your proof Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2016-08-16 20:38 -0700
Re: Show us your proof Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2016-08-16 21:18 -0700
Re: Show us your Spoof Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-18 22:35 -0500
csiph-web