Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #593105

Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam"

From Sergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam"
Date 2016-08-13 23:58 -0500
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <nootpc$194j$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (17 earlier) <9ce20c99-0c42-4293-adc2-a727b167fdc3@googlegroups.com> <n85dus$t0a$1@gioia.aioe.org> <6a255077-4df8-43cd-b504-7f67144a26f5@googlegroups.com> <n8683s$d47$1@gioia.aioe.org> <00ff218a-50df-44db-aa16-09af5d76d16b@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 8/13/2016 11:38 AM, Claudius Denk wrote:
> On Monday, January 25, 2016 at 2:37:58 PM UTC-8, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> On 1/25/2016 1:50 PM, claudiusdenk@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On Monday, January 25, 2016 at 7:11:30 AM UTC-8, Odd Bodkin
>>> wrote:
>>>

>>>> Right. But the boiling temperature and pressure of water is not
>>>> the lowest temperature at which gaseous water exists.
>>>
>>> It is regrettable that the internet does not allow you to post
>>> links to your imagination so that you could provide support for
>>> this absurd claim.
  >
>> It's not imagination. It's basic freshman physics book stuff, found
>> in books in chemistry, biology and physics. Since you dismiss links
>> to the internet, I can provide (and have provided) book references.
>> You asked for a steam table link, by the way, and I provided you
>> one, and you asked for something else so you could make your case.
>> You have not made your case.

>> You are saying that BASIC facts are absurd, Jim.
>>
>>>
>>> So . . . uh . . .er. . . uh.  Why do you think it is the steam
>>> tables don't confirm your imagination on this point?  Is it a
>>> mistake?  Conspiracy?  Does it involve space aliens?  Bigfoot?
>>>

>> You are the one that is imagining that steam tables indicate that
>> no gaseous water exists below the boiling point. So point to where
>> steam tables show that.
>>
>>
>> -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

> Uh, McGinn is right.  The boiling temperature of H2O is well
> established and it is much hotter than anything in the atmosphere.
>

no, you are McGinn,

and you are *lonely*,  reposting this from January.

          go get a real f*cking job.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2016-08-13 09:38 -0700
  less than 00 noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-13 10:46 -0700
    a) noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-13 18:21 -0700
  Re: Why Meteorologists Won't Talk About "Cold Steam" Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-13 23:58 -0500
    c00l steam noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 15:56 -0700
      Re: c00l steam noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-19 11:19 -0700

csiph-web