Re: Assembly is avoided whenever possible, because it isn't portable.

From	Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics, news.software.readers
Subject	Re: Assembly is avoided whenever possible, because it isn't portable.
Followup-To	comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date	2016-08-10 10:53 +0000
Organization	NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95
Message-ID	<nof13a081n@news3.newsguy.com> (permalink)
References	<5de9aacb-e6e8-4e82-8801-41fbc9dd80ff@googlegroups.com> <no767f02lna@news6.newsguy.com> <dfabcea0-ba15-4553-9651-90a1a61a91b0@googlegroups.com> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Aug.7{7.11A.Seattle.2016}> <1m0jqbpmfh037ho3en375bo07rr0cm804c@4ax.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Followups directed to: comp.os.linux.advocacy

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue, 09 Aug 2016 03:21:07 -0400, Michael J. Strickland wrote:

>
> You probably don't want to
> use it for higher math
>

I am not sure what you mean by "higher math," but, in general,
one WOULD want to use assembly, especially if said "higher math"
can be implemented using parallel processing.

Thread

Re: Assembly is avoided whenever possible, because it isn't portable. Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2016-08-09 03:21 -0400
  Re: Assembly is avoided whenever possible, because it isn't portable. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-09 13:26 -0700
    Re: Assembly is avoided whenever possible, because it isn't portable. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 11:12 -0700
      pi > 00 noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-12 12:53 -0700
        00 < pi noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 16:00 -0700
  Re: Assembly is avoided whenever possible, because it isn't portable. Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-08-10 10:53 +0000
  Re: Assembly is avoided whenever possible, because it isn't portable. Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-08-10 15:58 -0400

csiph-web