Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #591152

Re: Proton orbits electron

Show all headers | View raw

On 7/29/2016 10:55 AM, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
> The angular momentum of the atom is not from a planetary system of a massive
> center holding a light weight electron in a circular orbit. The angular momentum
> of an atom has a stationary flow. The flow of gravity goes into the proton to form
> the linear momentum that stationary flow is used to calculate the angular momentum
> with an axis that is at a distance from the linear momentum. The distance is the
> atomic radius. Using the electron as the origin for relative measurements, the proton
> is part of the atomic orbital. This unconventional perspective is an advance in science.
>
> Atoms are not moving like planetary sytems. When I say a proton orbits an electron,
> that is a stationary orbital. A probability is given by old science for the electron's
> position. Advances in science can change the probability representation to an articulated
> dimensional model.

While it is true that electrons do not orbit the proton in the same 
classical way that planets orbit the sun, when you go into the quantum 
mechanical treatment, you find that the barycenter still does play the 
same equivalent role in the quantum case as it does in the classical 
case. That is, the reason why the proton does not move much is because 
it is much more massive than the electron -- even quantum mechanically.

The rest of your words are just gibberish, unfortunately, and I'm 
frankly wondering why you think it is a smart thing to do to put 
together a string of gibberish like "the flow of gravity goes into the 
proton to form the linear momentum" and put it out there in public. Do 
you really think that the people where you're posting this will read it 
and have no idea whether what you're saying makes sense or not? Do you 
really think that composing sentences that SOUND like physics will be 
taken by readers to BE physics?


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Proton orbits electron Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 15:05 -0700
  Re: Proton orbits electron Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-07-29 07:28 +0200
  Re: Proton orbits electron Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-29 09:06 -0500
    Re: Proton orbits electron Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-07-29 08:55 -0700
      Re: Proton orbits electron noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-07-29 09:07 -0700
      Re: Proton orbits electron Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-29 11:14 -0500
        Re: Proton orbits electron brandonahenley9@gmail.com - 2016-07-29 12:20 -0700

csiph-web