Re: Gravity and light question

From	Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Gravity and light question
Date	2016-07-27 12:56 -0500
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<nnaski$122a$2@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	<0a163a49-9fa1-4559-9d24-690bc522b0c6@googlegroups.com> <4f37b676-7625-41f0-89a6-e537cf0fa6a6@googlegroups.com> <nnaahj$2oe$3@gioia.aioe.org> <5b710ecd-b3e6-4dc4-b827-2d090adda31a@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 7/27/2016 11:19 AM, mapou001@gmail.com wrote:
> You're a nutless wonder, not to mention stupid. Math never explains anything. It's purely descriptive.

And in this you're just flat wrong, as I've stated before.
I get that you WANT math to be not ever explanatory, because you can't 
deal with math and want to diminish its value, but that's just not the 
case. Math is a SHORTHAND for words. When you are writing math, you are 
doing the same thing you could be doing with words, just more concretely 
and more compactly. So where there is an explanation available in words, 
there is also often a way to provide the SAME explanation in math. You 
just don't understand it.

> The inverse square law of gravity does not explain gravity or anything else. Why do you insist
> on being so fucking stupid, jackass?
>
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Thread

Re: Gravity and light question mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-26 21:05 -0700
  Re: Gravity and light question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 07:47 -0500
    Re: Gravity and light question mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-27 09:19 -0700
      Re: Gravity and light question Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-27 11:56 -0500
      Re: Gravity and light question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 12:56 -0500
        Re: Gravity and light question mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-27 11:19 -0700

csiph-web