Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion?

From	"hanson" <hanson@quick.net>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion?
Date	2016-07-16 22:29 -0700
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<nmf557$1ro$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <d29e65f9-51e7-4e5d-a02c-96b4011ad14c@googlegroups.com> <16c53d4a-620e-4173-9a3b-6f53a0be6300@googlegroups.com> <segkobh02ecuuff52nrjmr46t8j4kou1ab@4ax.com> <d0ba1086-11dc-4b45-adb9-5523f08fd6f3@googlegroups.com> <md3mob5dlkcinh3o6tgpuknvls2o7t19kv@4ax.com>

Show all headers | View raw

"Wally W." <ww84wa@aim.com> wrote in message 
news:md3mob5dlkcinh3o6tgpuknvls2o7t19kv@4ax.com...
> Louis Savain <mapou001@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Saturday, July 16, 2016 at 7:22:30 AM UTC-7, Wally W. wrote:
>>> On Sat, 16 Jul 2016 02:20:07 -0700 (PDT), mapou001@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>> >First explain how a universe in which everything is relative is not a 
>>> >self-referential universe.
>>>
>>> What is wrong with the universe being self-referential?
>>>
>>> Or what point do you want to make based on a conclusion that the
>>> universe is self-referential?
>>
>>Are you a relativist? I am asking because this is precisely the kind of 
>>stupid question I would expect from a brain-dead relativist.
>>
>>ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>
"Wally W." wrote:
> "If you can't explain it simply, --- [1] -----
> you don't understand it well enough." - Albert Einstein
>
hanson wrote:
Wally, here are examples of AE's "simple" explanations:
>
||| AE||| "People like us, who **believe** in physics,
||| AE||| know that the distinction between the
||| AE||| past, resent, and future is only a stubbornly
||| AE||| persistent illusion."
>
IOW, young  Einstein's deranged mind was so badly
twisted that his Weltbild was a state in which it did
not matter when he did what, ... whether what he did
was already done, or whether it was in the process
of being done, or whether it was just a Gedanken fart
that sh/w/could be done some day in the future. LOL.
>
But as Einstein aged and his SR/GR crock o'shit began
to lose its luster he said:
>
|||AE:||| "why would anyone be interested in getting exact
|||AE:||| solutions from such an ephemeral set of equations?"
|||AE:||| "as far as the laws of mathematics refer to
|||AE:||| reality, they are not certain; and as far as they
|||AE:||| are certain, they do not refer to reality."
>
and finally 2 years before Einstein puffed,
<http://tinyurl.com/Einstein-denied-his-SR-and-GR
in which Albert concluded that:
____ SR is short for STUPID RANT _____ & that
____ GR stands for GULLIBLE RECITAL _____
>
and said
|||AE:||| "If I had my life to live over again, I'd be a plumber".
|||AE:||| ... [and I would make blouses instead. (see link)]
<http://tinyurl.com/Blouse-Plumber-Einstein>
<http://tinyurl.com/Tears-for-Einsteins-Misery>
>
Yet like with all BELIEFS, AE's disciples who are nothing
but Einstein Dingleberries that worship Albert's Sphincter
while dangling in the warm & cozy breeze of Einstein's
GEDANKEN farts, do continue to proselytize for it, like
all other faithful members of any other religion do.
>
GR is even worse, because GR STILL uses Newton's "G"
DIRECTLY, no  matter how badly Einstein Dingleberries
jump  up & down on Albert's Rubber Trampoline and try to
deny it. --  The 2nd G in g_/uv is Newton's "G" which AE
tried to get rid of but could NOT....
>
So, much for the physics of SR & GR, wherefore all of its
Believers have put a Dog cone (funnel) around their necks ...
<http://tinyurl.com/Dog-Cone-for-Relativists> to limit their
own pedestrian event-horizon in their vain hope to see
SR's non-existant Light cones..... .... ahahahAHAHAHA
>
But to let you off the hook with you citing AE philosophy
that is close to your heart, [1] there is another way you could
look at it and solve your problem; by absorbing yourself into
the timeless and aimless train of thought rxpressed by
Secy of Def. Donald Rumsfeld who said:
>
|||  "There are known knowns. There are things we
|||  know that we know. There are known unknowns.
|||  That is to say there are things that we now know
|||  we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns.
|||  And there are things we don't know we don't know."
[Feb. 12, 2002, Department of Defense news briefing
>
Thanks for the laughs, guys.... ahahahahahanson

Thread

What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-16 00:43 -0700
  Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-07-16 00:57 -0700
    Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-16 02:20 -0700
      Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-07-16 10:22 -0400
        Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-16 14:24 -0700
          Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-07-17 00:47 -0400
            Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-07-16 22:29 -0700
              Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-16 22:47 -0700
          Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-07-17 12:12 -0400
            Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-17 09:55 -0700
              Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-17 16:41 -0500
      Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-07-17 12:27 -0700
        Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-17 13:02 -0700
          Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-07-17 16:05 -0700
            Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-17 16:28 -0700
              Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-07-17 19:03 -0700
                Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-17 19:09 -0700
                Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-07-17 20:49 -0700
                Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-17 22:33 -0700
                Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-07-18 18:42 -0700
                Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-18 19:04 -0700
                Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-07-18 19:38 -0700
    Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-16 14:25 -0700
      Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-07-17 12:31 -0700
        Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-17 13:06 -0700
          Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-07-17 13:17 -0700
            Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-17 13:21 -0700
              Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-17 16:44 -0500
                Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? SPQR <SPQR@SPQR.org> - 2016-07-17 16:28 -0600
                Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-17 16:59 -0700
                Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-17 17:24 -0700
  Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? "Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesgurlz@t-girls.com> - 2016-07-16 06:24 -0700
    Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-16 12:44 -0700
  Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-16 13:00 -0500
  Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-16 12:04 -0700
    Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-17 14:10 -0700
  Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-07-16 23:16 -0700
    Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-07-17 10:04 -0700
  Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-17 06:19 -0400
    Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-07-17 11:33 +0100
    Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-17 22:46 +0000
      Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-17 18:52 -0400
        Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-18 06:24 -0400
          Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-19 00:05 +0000
            Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-07-18 20:39 -0400
              Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-18 20:19 -0700
              Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-19 06:19 -0400
                Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-19 23:07 +0000
          a particle in noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-07-18 18:44 -0700
      Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-17 15:55 -0700
        Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-17 15:59 -0700
  Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-17 12:29 -0500
    Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-17 11:24 -0700
    Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? xxein1@att.net - 2016-07-17 12:07 -0700
  Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-17 13:26 -0700
  Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? yanarchi@hotmail.com - 2016-07-18 21:58 -0700
    Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-18 22:03 -0700
  Re: What causes a particle in inertial motion to remain in motion? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-07-19 09:25 -0700

csiph-web