Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #588128
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: e e- pair production could be due to a 'neutral magnetic particle' |
| Date | 2016-07-06 14:47 +0000 |
| Organization | The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 |
| Message-ID | <nlj5lj$glh$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink) |
| References | <dts66hFivqiU1@mid.individual.net> <b8ronbplqnllt0j873j3q5948a44uun7ar@4ax.com> <5cb91d21-82b7-44aa-a416-867131e3f5ff@googlegroups.com> |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> babbles: >Yes. >And in each Galaxy. >Opposite galactic arms are a >matter-antimatter pair. And your explanation of a lack of 511 keV radiation as matter stars, in their orbit around the center, move out of a matter arm into inter-arm space, and into an anti-matter arm (or vice versa) as the star encounters anti-matter interstellar gas, is what? What about galaxies with 3 arms? Why don't you ever think your kookiness through to see whether (actually, where) it all falls apart? > At the atomic >level, a "down" electron is like >antimatter to an "up" electron. This >is the balance always being sought. An anti-matter electron is a positron, with a positive charge. A positron can be "up" or "down" just like an electron, if it is in a state where these states apply. Oh wait, I forgot. You hijack terms used by scientists (such as "black hole", "neutrino" and now "antimatter", and apply them to figments of your own imagination which has nothing to do with what everyone else uses these terms for. Who knows what it is you call "antimatter". So, "never mind".
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
e e- pair production could be due to a 'neutral magnetic particle' 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-07-03 11:02 +0000
e e- pair production could be due to a 'neutral magnetic particle' john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 06:35 -0700
Re: e e- pair production could be due to a 'neutral magnetic particle' Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2016-07-05 22:46 -0400
Re: e e- pair production could be due to a 'neutral magnetic particle' john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-06 06:14 -0700
Re: e e- pair production could be due to a 'neutral magnetic particle' moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-06 14:47 +0000
Re: e e- pair production could be due to a 'neutral magnetic particle' noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-07-06 11:07 -0700
Re: e e- pair production could be due to a 'neutral magnetic particle' 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-07-07 06:00 +0000
waves of that noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 10:57 -0700
csiph-web