Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #588128

Re: e e- pair production could be due to a 'neutral magnetic particle'

From moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: e e- pair production could be due to a 'neutral magnetic particle'
Date 2016-07-06 14:47 +0000
Organization The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989
Message-ID <nlj5lj$glh$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink)
References <dts66hFivqiU1@mid.individual.net> <b8ronbplqnllt0j873j3q5948a44uun7ar@4ax.com> <5cb91d21-82b7-44aa-a416-867131e3f5ff@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> babbles:

>Yes.
>And in each Galaxy.
>Opposite galactic arms are a
>matter-antimatter pair.

And your explanation of a lack of 511 keV radiation as matter stars,
in their orbit around the center, move out of a matter arm into
inter-arm space, and into an anti-matter arm (or vice versa)
as the star encounters anti-matter interstellar gas, is what?

What about galaxies with 3 arms?

Why don't you ever think your kookiness through to see whether
(actually, where) it all falls apart?

> At the atomic
>level, a "down" electron is like
>antimatter to an "up" electron. This
>is the balance always being sought.

An anti-matter electron is a positron, with a positive charge.
A positron can be "up" or "down" just like an electron, if it
is in a state where these states apply.

Oh wait, I forgot. You hijack terms used by scientists (such as
"black hole", "neutrino" and now "antimatter", and apply them to
figments of your own imagination which has nothing to do with what
everyone else uses these terms for.  Who knows what it is you call
"antimatter". So, "never mind".

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

e e- pair production could be due to a 'neutral magnetic particle' 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-07-03 11:02 +0000
  e e- pair production could be due to a 'neutral magnetic particle' john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 06:35 -0700
  Re: e e- pair production could be due to a 'neutral magnetic particle' Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2016-07-05 22:46 -0400
    Re: e e- pair production could be due to a 'neutral magnetic particle' john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-06 06:14 -0700
      Re: e e- pair production could be due to a 'neutral magnetic particle' moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-06 14:47 +0000
        Re: e e- pair production could be due to a 'neutral magnetic particle' noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-07-06 11:07 -0700
    Re: e e- pair production could be due to a 'neutral magnetic particle' 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-07-07 06:00 +0000
      waves of that noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 10:57 -0700

csiph-web