Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #576958

Re: most posters to sci.physics are poor in logic PLUTONIUM-ATOM-TOTALITY-UNIVERSE + Maxwell/AP-Equations-Describing all of Physics, 6th ed.

Path csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: most posters to sci.physics are poor in logic PLUTONIUM-ATOM-TOTALITY-UNIVERSE + Maxwell/AP-Equations-Describing all of Physics, 6th ed.
Date Tue, 10 May 2016 04:41:35 +0000 (UTC)
Organization The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989
Lines 19
Message-ID <ngropv$b1j$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink)
References <a073deaa-9724-4933-b0b1-17ead874cd25@googlegroups.com> <ZeGdnVy-F_sOw7PKnZ2dnUU7-fudnZ2d@giganews.com> <f7646091-696f-41aa-b06e-aef6e78458bc@googlegroups.com> <ngp4fd$nvb$1@pcls7.std.com> <dde158f5-a229-4321-9434-daf5f8777cea@googlegroups.com> <ngq8dk$9m5$2@pcls7.std.com> <9eec04f1-4f9a-4c50-83bc-81cbc34df949@googlegroups.com> <ngr6p8$upm$1@pcls7.std.com> <49d5e154-4d33-4c29-a04e-57bec02bf494@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host shell01.theworld.com
X-Trace pcls7.std.com 1462855295 11315 192.74.137.71 (10 May 2016 04:41:35 GMT)
X-Complaints-To abuse@TheWorld.com
NNTP-Posting-Date Tue, 10 May 2016 04:41:35 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent nn/6.6.5
Xref csiph.com sci.physics:576958

Show key headers only | View raw

Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes:

>On Monday, May 9, 2016 at 6:34:35 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes:

>Why does this attacking Boston Mass. nitwit oaf of a nonphysicist never
>list my full argument?

I am trying to follow your logic.  I am not attacking.  I have a problem
with your Step 3. We haven't even reached Step 4 and 5 yet, plus they
depend on Step 3. Once we resolve the logic issue with Step 3, we can look
at your Steps 4 and 5.

So, could you explain why you switched to the singular for "atom" in what
would otherwise be a trivial exercise in logic?

Again, I am not attacking. Any real scientist needs to accept scrutiny of
his or her ideas.  A PhD candidate has to defend his dissertation or
thesis.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

8th page, Bell Inequality PLUTONIUM-ATOM-TOTALITY-UNIVERSE + Maxwell/AP-Equations-Describing all of Physics, 6th ed. Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-05-07 14:23 -0700
  Re: 8th page, Bell Inequality PLUTONIUM-ATOM-TOTALITY-UNIVERSE + Maxwell/AP-Equations-Describing all of Physics, 6th ed. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-07 16:30 -0500
    Re: 8th page, Bell Inequality PLUTONIUM-ATOM-TOTALITY-UNIVERSE + Maxwell/AP-Equations-Describing all of Physics, 6th ed. Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-05-07 21:44 -0700
      Re: 8th page, Bell Inequality PLUTONIUM-ATOM-TOTALITY-UNIVERSE + Maxwell/AP-Equations-Describing all of Physics, 6th ed. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-08 08:19 -0500
        Re: 8th page, Bell Inequality PLUTONIUM-ATOM-TOTALITY-UNIVERSE + Maxwell/AP-Equations-Describing all of Physics, 6th ed. Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-05-08 15:19 -0700
      Re: 8th page, Bell Inequality PLUTONIUM-ATOM-TOTALITY-UNIVERSE + Maxwell/AP-Equations-Describing all of Physics, 6th ed. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-09 04:42 +0000
        most posters to sci.physics are poor in logic PLUTONIUM-ATOM-TOTALITY-UNIVERSE + Maxwell/AP-Equations-Describing all of Physics, 6th ed. Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-05-08 23:35 -0700
          Re: most posters to sci.physics are poor in logic PLUTONIUM-ATOM-TOTALITY-UNIVERSE + Maxwell/AP-Equations-Describing all of Physics, 6th ed. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-09 14:55 +0000
            Re: most posters to sci.physics are poor in logic PLUTONIUM-ATOM-TOTALITY-UNIVERSE + Maxwell/AP-Equations-Describing all of Physics, 6th ed. Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-05-09 15:40 -0700
              Re: most posters to sci.physics are poor in logic PLUTONIUM-ATOM-TOTALITY-UNIVERSE + Maxwell/AP-Equations-Describing all of Physics, 6th ed. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-09 23:34 +0000
                Re: most posters to sci.physics are poor in logic PLUTONIUM-ATOM-TOTALITY-UNIVERSE + Maxwell/AP-Equations-Describing all of Physics, 6th ed. Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-05-09 17:08 -0700
                Re: most posters to sci.physics are poor in logic PLUTONIUM-ATOM-TOTALITY-UNIVERSE + Maxwell/AP-Equations-Describing all of Physics, 6th ed. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-09 20:09 -0500
                Re: most posters to sci.physics are poor in logic PLUTONIUM-ATOM-TOTALITY-UNIVERSE + Maxwell/AP-Equations-Describing all of Physics, 6th ed. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-10 04:41 +0000
                use of disjunction in Atom syllogism; PLUTONIUM-ATOM-TOTALITY-UNIVERSE + Maxwell/AP-Equations-Describing all of Physics, 6th ed. Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-05-09 22:06 -0700

csiph-web