Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #572480
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Mass and weight does it change? |
| Date | 2016-04-22 13:46 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <nfdri3$1vp3$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <571a4a27$0$27597$c3e8da3$fdf4f6af@news.astraweb.com> <nfdja0$1hl4$1@gioia.aioe.org> <571a59c4$0$48877$c3e8da3$f017e9df@news.astraweb.com> <nfdnk6$1p00$1@gioia.aioe.org> <571a7055$0$54317$b1db1813$7968482@news.astraweb.com> |
On 4/22/2016 1:41 PM, benj wrote: > On 04/22/2016 01:39 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 4/22/2016 12:05 PM, benj wrote: >>> On 04/22/2016 12:25 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>> On 4/22/2016 10:58 AM, benj wrote: >>>>> DuckDuckGo is a tracking site for your searches. You can learn a lot >>>>> about a person by their internet searches! Ask HVAC. He loves a police >>>>> state. >>>>> >>>>> So it's no surprise that Wormley is promoting a tracking site. The big >>>>> surprise here is that HVAC is too stupid to know that HE also is >>>>> supposed to be promoting DuckDuckGo instead of making fun of it. >>>> >>>> Uh, Ben, a bit of a goof here on your part. One of the big selling >>>> features of DuckDuckGo is that it DOESN'T track your searches. >>> >>> And of course you and HVAC, totally BELIEVE everything that those in >>> power tell you is absolutely true, right. >>> >>> My information does not come from gummint press releases. It never >>> occurred to your pointy little head that the absolute best way to >>> install tracking software virus is through anti-virus "protection" >>> programs. Do you know how to spell "gullible"? >>> >> >> Uh-huh. So you believe that if a site is telling you that they don't >> track, this means they're tracking. And if software is proclaimed to >> remove adware, then it's really installing adware. And that if software >> is installed to protect against viruses, then it's installing viruses. > > So you like HardBlow think that science is all about belief? I didn't > say that their statement proves the opposite. Hows the debate team doing > this year? I said they are a tracking site and that the information > didn't come from their press releases. Then you are declaring them to be fraudulent, as they advertise the opposite. So if you have citations, cite away. Otherwise, Ben, I'll just pass on the observation that just because you've been lied to is not a really good excuse for you to lie your ass off. > >> So I suppose that when a dentist says he's repairing holes in your >> teeth, he's really drilling holes to cause decay. And when a delivery >> man comes to deliver a package, he's really there to steal things from >> you. And likewise, everyone is lying about everything. > > Oh you are rolling now. It's called a strawman in debating circles. > First you set up something that you just made up (your everything means > the opposite theory) and then proceed to rip it to shreds to "win" the > debate! So how IS the debate team doing this year? You should get > interested in science. It's far more interesting than debates and even > true. (sometimes) > >> Or maybe you know in your heart of hearts that they're not lying all the >> time, but you've been lied to enough that it's just safer to assume that >> everyone is lying all the time. And I'm sure you believe this is a >> rational response. > > The strawman dead yet? I told you my source of information was NOT press > releases. As far as anyone knows, your source of information is a fever- and hunger-induced hallucination. > >> A while ago I posted about arguing with lunatics. Any retrospective on >> that post, Ben? > > Since I never said their assertions prove they are lying, the only > lunatic you are arguing with is yourself. Having fun? Won the debate > yet? An Ad hominem is always a good way to cap off a strawman attack in > a healthy debate! I think I smell WINNER here! > > -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Mass and weight does it change? Om Prakash <oomprakash@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 00:03 -0700
Re: Mass and weight does it change? "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 02:02 -0700
Re: Mass and weight does it change? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 08:02 -0500
Re: Mass and weight does it change? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 08:11 -0500
Re: Mass and weight does it change? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 06:26 -0700
Re: Mass and weight does it change? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-22 11:58 -0400
Re: Mass and weight does it change? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 11:25 -0500
Re: Mass and weight does it change? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-22 13:05 -0400
Re: Mass and weight does it change? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 12:39 -0500
Re: Mass and weight does it change? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-22 14:41 -0400
Re: Mass and weight does it change? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 13:46 -0500
Re: Mass and weight does it change? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 09:43 -0700
Re: Mass and weight does it change? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-22 12:59 -0400
Re: Mass and weight does it change? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 09:18 -0700
Re: Mass and weight does it change? Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-04-22 10:10 -0400
Re: Mass and weight does it change? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 10:11 -0700
Re: Mass and weight does it change? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-04-22 11:02 -0700
Re: Mass and weight does it change? benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-22 14:56 -0400
csiph-web