Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #563679

Re: Jim's backpedaling and lying...

Show all headers | View raw

On 3/19/2016 12:19 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote:
> James Bernard McGinn, Jr. of Antioch, CA screeched defensively:
>
>> What is being measured here is, indirectly, the strength/distance
>> of the H bonds. Right? Well, now think about that . . . if it was
>> genuinely gas then . . . think about it . . . there would be no
>> peak at all . . . BECAUSE IF IT WAS GENUINELY GASEOUS H2O THERE
>> WOULD BE NO H BONDS! (Specifically, the data would not indicate
>> a peak it would indicate a flat line because there would be no
>> variation in bond strength/distance to cause a statistical
>> distribution.)
>
>

> Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change
> upon H bonding (which would have side effects such as random changes
> in the solvent properties of water... and we know those properties do
> not randomly change, Jim), and in fact the two spin isomers of water
> molecules account for the different H bonding strengths which account
> for evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your
> implausible claims are workable, Jim?
> ============================================================
>
> Why can't you answer those questions, Jim?
>

there are reasons why he cannot.

James McGinn can not think in logical, or scientific ways.

Discussing science with him, is identical to discussing science with a 
parrot that makes utterances.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Jim's backpedaling and lying... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-19 18:19 +0100
  Re: Jim's backpedaling and lying... James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 10:45 -0700
    Re: Jim's backpedaling and lying... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-19 20:59 +0100
      Re: Jim's backpedaling and lying... James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 15:10 -0700
        Re: Jim's backpedaling and lying... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-20 06:36 +0100
          Re: Jim's backpedaling and lying... James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 23:27 -0700
            Re: Jim's backpedaling and lying... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-20 19:49 +0100
              Re: Jim's backpedaling and lying... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-20 14:45 -0600
                Re: Jim's backpedaling and lying... snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-20 21:06 +0000
    Re: Jim's backpedaling and lying... James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-23 23:26 -0700
      Re: Jim's backpedaling and lying... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-24 18:25 +0100
        Re: Jim's backpedaling and lying... Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-24 10:51 -0700
          Re: Jim's backpedaling and lying... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-25 07:07 +0100
  Re: Jim's backpedaling and lying... Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-19 13:30 -0500
    pedaling and noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 18:23 -0700
      Re: pedaling and Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-19 21:54 -0500

csiph-web