Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame

From	Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame
Date	2016-03-16 08:44 -0500
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<ncbnvu$pg5$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <0d5d77ae-6460-44a7-af95-ada6d8216899@googlegroups.com> <nc6vre$1r2$1@gioia.aioe.org> <0ea0fcda-58c0-4eaf-af15-b6fab5f59ab7@googlegroups.com> <nc92o8$r7r$1@gioia.aioe.org> <a784b7c8-7768-4380-b799-4c1b8df9143c@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 3/15/2016 7:19 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 15, 2016 at 8:29:55 AM UTC-5, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> (snipped)
>
>>
>> Well, thanks for explaining your motivation. Rest assured that I have no
>> interest in attacking you. I also have no interest in attacking your
>> theory about a big plutonium atom. Rather, it will be interesting to see
>> if your idea has any testable predictions that can be compared to
>> experiment, especially data we do not have in hand.
>>
>
> Well, yes a true theory has to make some testable predictions and one prediction
> of an Atom Totality is a Nucleus where most of the mass of the Cosmos lies. Another
> prediction is that Space, the night sky is the last 6 electrons of 231Pu as the 5f6
> and so some of the sky is electron 93rd and some 94th.

And so what are the suggested measurements that you would make to test 
these predictions?

>
> But then you fail to realize that in science, a true theory means not just prediction,
> but a true theory means able to conform or agree with existing facts and knowns.

Yes.

> In
> your case, your Big Bang, your Einstein General Relativity cannot conform to the known
> fact that the Cosmos is a Blackbody cavity in the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation
> CMBR.

I beg to differ. The CMBR was a *prediction* of the Big Bang theory. How 
can the Big Bang theory make a prediction of something it would be 
incompatible with?

> There is nothing logical in Big Bang or GR to support this blackbody cosmos,
> which should tell you your beliefs of physics are of the absurd. Another fact that Big
> Bang, Einstein GR fails miserably is solid body rotation for which the Cosmos is
> widespread of this rotation. What can support solid body rotation is Maxwell EM theory,
> telling us again, that the Cosmos as a whole is a structure, an entity and it must thus
> be a big atom. Another detail fact is the Bell Inequality for which Einstein physics
> lost and which tells us the Big Bang GR cannot support.

Here you have wandered away from comparison with experimental 
observations and are trying to make an argument on some grounds other 
than comparison with observation. That's not how science works.

>
> So, your problem is that you accept physics theories by bandwagon acceptance and never
> by analysis using LOGIC. Can a Big Bang, GR support a idea that the Cosmos is a
> structure? Of course not, for what Big Bang is, is an amorphous nonentity.

I'm sorry, but the presumption that the Cosmos has a structure is not a 
law that has to be respected. It is your hypothesis which you believe 
should be true, but you have no basis for rejecting all other theories 
that don't include your hypothesis. The only -- I repeat, ONLY -- viable 
measure of validity of a theory is comparison with experimental 
observation. Consistency with your privately held hypotheses is not a 
viable measure of validity.

>
> I am not going to try to persuade you to the Atom Totality theory, but pointing out the
> flaws gaps and errors of your belief system.
>
> I don't think you ever made a LOGICAL attempt of assessing what it is you believe in
> physics, and that your entire running around in physics has been a blanket acceptance
> of what others say is true in print.

I certainly don't have any reason to believe that what's in print is a lie.

>
> AP
>


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Thread

Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame with wrong ideas rather than no fame but the truth? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 20:23 -0800
  Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame with wrong ideas rather than no fame but the truth? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-03-13 11:20 -0700
    Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame with wrong ideas rather than no fame but the truth? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-13 11:27 -0700
      Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame with wrong ideas rather than no fame but the truth? Anonymous <anonymous@foto.nl1.torservers.net> - 2016-03-19 13:44 -0400
        Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame with wrong ideas rather than no fame but the truth? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 15:20 -0700
    Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame with wrong ideas rather than no fame but the truth? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-03-13 17:06 -0700
  Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame with wrong ideas rather than no fame but the truth? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 09:55 -0500
  Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame with wrong ideas rather than no fame but the truth? edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-03-14 08:09 -0700
  Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 10:38 -0700
    Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 13:27 -0500
      Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 19:07 -0700
        Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 08:29 -0500
          Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 17:19 -0700
            Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 08:44 -0500
              Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 19:39 -0700
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 21:42 -0500
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 06:25 -0700
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 08:55 -0500
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 08:59 -0500
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 08:49 -0500
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 09:15 -0700
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 09:51 -0700
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 12:13 -0500
                camsZor noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 10:30 -0700
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 12:59 -0500
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 12:40 -0700
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-18 18:49 -0700
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 08:43 -0500
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Cesare Pancratius <cesarepanc@porphyriocontext.org> - 2016-03-19 14:18 +0000
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-19 17:05 +0000
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 15:08 -0700
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 09:34 -0500
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 23:38 -0700
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 11:51 -0700
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 15:29 -0500
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 16:38 -0700
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 18:41 -0500
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 17:46 -0700
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 08:09 -0500
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 22:21 -0700
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 14:26 -0700
                numbers as quotients etc. (fractions as exponents e.g noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-22 17:15 -0700
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-23 14:59 -0700
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-24 06:12 -0700
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-24 08:49 -0500
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 07:35 -0700
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 09:43 -0500
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 08:20 -0500
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 09:03 -0700
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 11:28 -0500
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 10:19 -0700
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 16:25 -0700
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-29 07:05 -0700
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-29 09:22 -0700
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-29 11:53 -0500
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-30 20:20 -0700
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-31 03:02 -0700
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-31 11:41 -0500
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-31 14:54 -0700
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-31 16:58 -0500
                forces of physics as one "variable force of EM" Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 11:26 -0700
                forces of physics as one "variable force of EM" Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 20:54 -0700
                Re: forces of physics as one "variable force of EM" Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-03 10:57 -0700
                Re: forces of physics as one "variable force of EM" Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-03 21:21 -0700
                Re: forces of physics as one "variable force of EM" Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Snowshoe <no@spam.please> - 2016-04-04 01:13 -0400
                Re: forces of physics as one "variable force of EM" Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 06:26 -0700
                Re: forces of physics as one "variable force of EM" Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 14:12 -0700
                Re: forces of physics as one "variable force of EM" Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Snowshoe <no@spam.please> - 2016-04-05 13:26 -0400
                linking solid body rotation with alpha decay Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 14:17 -0700
                Re: linking solid body rotation with alpha decay Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 17:15 -0500
                Re: linking solid body rotation with alpha decay Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 10:47 -0700
                Re: linking solid body rotation with alpha decay Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 13:10 -0500
                Re: linking solid body rotation with alpha decay Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 12:32 -0700
                Re: linking solid body rotation with alpha decay Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 15:41 -0500
                Re: linking solid body rotation with alpha decay Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 15:42 -0500
                Re: linking solid body rotation with alpha decay Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 12:57 -0700
                Re: linking solid body rotation with alpha decay Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 16:27 -0500
                Re: linking solid body rotation with alpha decay Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 13:12 -0700
                Feynmann's liposarcoma and death at 69 age, 1988 Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 11:42 -0700
                Re: Feynmann's liposarcoma and death at 69 age, 1988 R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-04-10 21:57 +0000
                Re: linking solid body rotation with alpha decay Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 15:54 -0500
                Feynmann's liposarcoma Re: linking solid body rotation with alpha decay Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 22:59 -0700
                Re: Feynmann's liposarcoma Re: linking solid body rotation with alpha decay Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 07:23 -0500
                Compression theory as a cause of cancer Re: Feynmann's liposarcoma Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 13:51 -0700
                Re: linking solid body rotation with alpha decay Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Snowshoe <no@spam.please> - 2016-04-06 00:13 -0400
                Re: forces of physics as one "variable force of EM" Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 10:29 -0500
                Re: forces of physics as one "variable force of EM" Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 10:22 -0500
                gi'me a u. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 08:00 -0700
                Re: gi'me a u. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 21:39 -0700
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 14:25 -0500
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 13:05 -0700
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-27 06:00 -0700
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-27 12:18 -0700
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 15:28 -0500
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 09:29 -0500
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 09:15 -0700
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 11:34 -0500
                Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 08:41 -0500
        Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 07:28 -0700
          Re: Casimir, & seasonal shift Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 14:26 -0400
  Re: Occam's Razor on LIGO recent ping Re: was not aware physicists use phony irrational numbers to compensate for LIGO Re: why so many scientists and mathematicians opt for flash fame with wrong ideas rather than no fame but the truth? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 14:11 -0500

csiph-web