Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #545803

Re: The mass of the sun II

From Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: The mass of the sun II
Date 2016-01-16 07:46 +0100
Organization Good company
Message-ID <n7corj$3tn$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <ae43f3ef-0fe9-4e96-b77e-ffe1184ba3ab@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Dne 16/01/2016 v 06:43 Peter Riedt napsal(a):
> The mass of the sun II
> 
> The standard method to calculate the mass of the sun is by the formula
> M = 4(3.14159265359)^2*(149597870700)^3/((6.674E-11)(365*24*60*60)^2) with a result of 1.98846548016881E+30 using the standard value of AU of 149,597,870,700 m.

1/ Valid for the main ellipse half axis equal to AU
2/ 365 days is not Earth orbit period
3/ How can low accuracy of G provide result with accuracy of 15 digits ?
4/ IT is much better to use symbolic algebraic notations then inaccurate
numbers.

> 
> But in the course of a year AU changes from 147,100,176,000 m in January
> to 152,103,775,000 m in July because the orbit of the earth is not circular.

AU does not change. It is DEFINED as 149,597,870,700 m
Therefor Earth Sun distance oscillates around 1 AU
and the main ellipse half axis is greater than 1  AU.


-- 
Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer )

Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

The mass of the sun II Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-01-15 21:43 -0800
  Re: The mass of the sun II Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-01-16 07:46 +0100
    Re: The mass of the sun II Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-01-16 01:24 -0800
  Re: The mass of the sun II R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-01-16 09:10 +0000
  Re: The mass of the sun II Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-16 10:51 -0600
    Re: The mass of the sun II Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-01-16 15:21 -0800
      Re: The mass of the sun II Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-16 18:13 -0600
  Re: The mass of the sun II Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-16 11:15 -0600
    Re: The mass of the sun II Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-01-16 15:25 -0800
      Re: The mass of the sun II Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-16 18:16 -0600
        Re: The mass of the sun II Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-01-17 00:24 -0800
          Re: The mass of the sun II Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-17 12:08 -0600
            Re: The mass of the sun II Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-01-17 10:25 -0800
              Re: The mass of the sun II Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-17 12:36 -0600
                Re: The mass of the sun II Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-01-17 10:51 -0800

csiph-web