Re: Future Advances in Physics...

From	Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: Future Advances in Physics...
Date	2015-12-23 08:19 -0600
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<n5eahf$p3s$3@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(9 earlier) <KrXdy.17889$h27.13304@fx23.iad> <56784cd8$0$23753$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> <yx2ey.50056$9A4.30445@fx40.iad> <5679b915$0$23802$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> <eGpey.38442$cu5.30516@fx13.iad>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 12/22/2015 10:46 PM, benj wrote:
>> If measurements agree with other measurements then at least
>> they are reproducible.
>
> And that means? People like to say that results that are not not
> reproducible means the phenomena is a hoax. You must be one of those
> guys who thinks lightning is all hoaxes by college kids!

Ben, don't be an idiot. Reproducibility doesn't mean that humans have to 
be able to manufacture it.

Reproducibility just means that if certain conditions prevail, then the 
outcome is predictable. This is true for lightning too. All you need to 
have is a set of circumstances, whether naturally occurring OR man-made, 
that will reliably produce the predicted result.

The problem is that Uri Geller could never seem to muster the reliable 
circumstances where that result would be the necessary outcome.

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Thread

Re: Future Advances in Physics... benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-12-18 23:39 -0500
  Re: Future Advances in Physics... Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-19 06:52 +0100
    Re: Future Advances in Physics... rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-12-19 01:43 -0500
      Re: Future Advances in Physics... "szczepan  bialek" <sz.bialek@wp.pl> - 2015-12-19 09:48 +0100
      Re: Future Advances in Physics... benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-12-19 13:33 -0500
    Re: Future Advances in Physics... benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-12-19 13:32 -0500
      Re: Future Advances in Physics... Jos Bergervoet <jos.bergervoet@xs4all.nl> - 2015-12-19 21:06 +0100
        Re: Future Advances in Physics... benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-20 01:47 -0500
          Re: Future Advances in Physics... Jos Bergervoet <jos.bergervoet@xs4all.nl> - 2015-12-20 10:36 +0100
            Re: Future Advances in Physics... benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-12-21 02:55 -0500
              Re: Future Advances in Physics... Jos Bergervoet <jos.bergervoet@xs4all.nl> - 2015-12-21 11:50 +0100
                Re: Future Advances in Physics... "szczepan  bialek" <sz.bialek@wp.pl> - 2015-12-21 18:08 +0100
                Re: Future Advances in Physics... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-12-21 12:17 -0600
                Re: Future Advances in Physics... benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-21 13:22 -0500
                Re: Future Advances in Physics... Jos Bergervoet <jos.bergervoet@xs4all.nl> - 2015-12-21 20:02 +0100
                Re: Future Advances in Physics... benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-21 21:26 -0500
                Re: Future Advances in Physics... Jos Bergervoet <jos.bergervoet@xs4all.nl> - 2015-12-22 21:56 +0100
                Re: Future Advances in Physics... benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-22 23:46 -0500
                Re: Future Advances in Physics... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-12-23 08:19 -0600
                Re: Future Advances in Physics... benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-12-23 14:10 -0500
                Re: Future Advances in Physics... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-12-23 13:49 -0600
                Re: Future Advances in Physics... benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-23 22:03 -0500
                Re: Future Advances in Physics... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-12-24 11:00 -0600
                Re: Future Advances in Physics... benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-24 21:17 -0500
                Re: Future Advances in Physics... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-12-26 12:39 -0600
                Re: Future Advances in Physics... Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-12-23 23:46 -0600
                Re: Future Advances in Physics... Waye Kitchens <wscom@complang.net> - 2015-12-24 15:15 +0000
                Re: Future Advances in Physics... Waye Kitchens <wscom@complang.net> - 2015-12-23 22:04 +0000
                Re: Future Advances in Physics... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-12-23 16:29 -0600
                Re: Future Advances in Physics... Waye Kitchens <wscom@complang.net> - 2015-12-23 22:53 +0000
                Re: Future Advances in Physics... Don Kelly <dhky@shaw.ca> - 2015-12-24 18:24 -0800
                Re: Future Advances in Physics... benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-24 22:18 -0500
                Re: Future Advances in Physics... Don Kelly <dhky@shaw.ca> - 2015-12-25 15:54 -0800
                Re: Future Advances in Physics... benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-12-26 03:58 -0500
                Re: Future Advances in Physics... Jos Bergervoet <jos.bergervoet@xs4all.nl> - 2015-12-26 11:35 +0100
                Re: Future Advances in Physics... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-12-26 04:01 -0800
                Re: Future Advances in Physics... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-12-26 04:19 -0800
                Re: Future Advances in Physics... Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-12-26 13:09 -0600
                Re: Future Advances in Physics... HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-12-26 05:14 -0800
                Re: Future Advances in Physics... benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-12-26 14:16 -0500
                Re: Future Advances in Physics... "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-12-26 14:54 -0800
                Re: Future Advances in Physics... Jos Bergervoet <jos.bergervoet@xs4all.nl> - 2015-12-25 10:50 +0100
                Re: Future Advances in Physics... Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-12-25 11:46 -0600
                Re: Future Advances in Physics... Jos Bergervoet <jos.bergervoet@xs4all.nl> - 2015-12-25 20:28 +0100
                Re: Future Advances in Physics... Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-25 03:09 +0100
                Re: Future Advances in Physics... benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-25 04:00 -0500
                Re: Future Advances in Physics... Jos Bergervoet <jos.bergervoet@xs4all.nl> - 2015-12-25 11:01 +0100
                Re: Future Advances in Physics... benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-25 14:39 -0500
                Re: Future Advances in Physics... "Bill Miller" <kt4ye@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-22 18:17 -0500
                Re: Future Advances in Physics... HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 17:23 -0800
                Re: Future Advances in Physics... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 19:44 -0800
                Re: Future Advances in Physics... HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 02:27 -0800
                Re: Future Advances in Physics... benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 02:45 -0500
  Re: Future Advances in Physics... Timo <timo@physics.uq.edu.au> - 2015-12-19 01:29 -0800
    Re: Future Advances in Physics... benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-12-19 13:58 -0500
      Re: Future Advances in Physics... dobri karagorgov <dobrikarate.gov@gmail.com> - 2015-12-19 11:15 -0800
      Re: Future Advances in Physics... Timo <timo@physics.uq.edu.au> - 2015-12-19 13:07 -0800
        Re: Future Advances in Physics... benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-12-21 03:23 -0500
          Re: Future Advances in Physics... Timo <timo@physics.uq.edu.au> - 2015-12-21 01:11 -0800
      Re: Future Advances in Physics... HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-12-19 16:47 -0800

csiph-web