Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #540961

Re: Sänta Hägar

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
>news:n5954t$ic6$2@pcls7.std.com...
>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>>>
>>>>>Ok SE, if you are so fcuking smart then explain why
>>>>>And then explain why
>>>>>And then why didn't NIST explain
>>>>
>>>> K00ktard, you don't get it.  You are the one coming up with some k00ky
>>>> conspiracy theory, so it's up to YOU to prove it, not up to Sarah to
>>>> disprove it.  Just like Sarah said.
>>
>>>Michael, you are forgetting, it is easy to prove that CGIs were used in 
>>>Nuke
>>>York City because all you have to do is compare them to real CGIs.
>>
>> Yet nobody has proven that CGIs were used in NYC that day.  In fact, you
>> proved the exact opposite (using the Duck Test) that CGIs were *not* used!

>And you have watched those videos of the alleged jets in slow motion when? 

I watched the clip in one of your kookvids (the one you used to prove all
kookvids are lies) and it showed the plane fly behind the crane at full 
speed, then slower, then slower, then slower.  But when I took still 
frames of the full speed portion and the slowed portion, it was obvious
the slowed portion was altered.  The blurry jet image was replaced by a 
much higher quality image.  How can the quality of a video magically
improve?  It can't, it was faked.

You took that fact to prove that *all* kookvids have been tampered with,
and are thus lies.  You're such a genius!  So now there is no reason to
even watch a k00kvid, unless you are trying to see _how_ they lied, or
_how_ they tampered with the video or something.

>>>And do not forget why all the videos of a CGI flying into the South Tower
>>>end so abruptly and that is because they didn't want to show the 
>>>explosions
>>>necessary to make the holes that the CGIs could not make.  <G>
>>
>> Except that's not true.  Maybe it's true in k00kvids, since we all know
>> that all k00kvids are just a pack of lies, so maybe it's true that all
>> clips of the plane flying into the South Tower are abruptly cut off in
>> k00kvids.  Just like how k00kvids never show the east penthouse of
>> Building 7 collapsing before the rest of the outer wall did.  They don't
>> want to show that much of the building had already collapsed before the
>> outer wall did.

>ROTFLMAO.  There are hours and hours of TV from most all the news channels 
>and they all do about the exact same thing and that is not let you see that 
>explosions were necessary to make the holes in the Twin Towers that the CGIs 
>could not.  DUH

You're babbling, kooktard.  If you can find an honest video with a 
discrepancy, point it out.  Not a k00kvid, you already proved they are
all lies so no reason for me to waste my time with 4 hours of lies.

>And even if you want to talk about the order that WTC 7 came down look at 
>how NIST avoids how fast WTC7 came down.  They use an overall average to 
>avoid the fact that for the first 100 feet WTC7 came down at a speed 
>comparable to a CD or ND where ND is not Nuclear Demolition but Nuclear 
>Destruction.

Once again you kookclaim the collapse is "comparable to a Nuclear Demolition"
but you *still* haven't shown me another "Nuclear Demolition" to compare
it to!

The point is the k00kvids never show the start of the collapse (the east
penthouse going).  By the time we saw "the building" collapse, much of it,
the inside, and maybe the south wall, was already gone, and the "collapse"
was just the remaining outer shell going.  With the rest of the building
already gone, it's not surprising the shell collapsed at freefall.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Sänta Hägar "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-20 21:10 -0600
  Re: Sänta Hägar moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-21 15:16 +0000
    Re: Sänta Hägar "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-12-22 14:51 -0600
      Re: Sänta Hägar moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-12-23 05:10 +0000
      Re: Sänta Hägar "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-12-24 03:58 -0600
      Re: Sänta Hägar Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-12-24 20:51 +0000

csiph-web