Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #533068
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? |
| Date | 2015-11-14 19:27 +0000 |
| Organization | The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 |
| Message-ID | <n281v3$nvd$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <n27idi$vh6$1@dont-email.me> <2e3f8fc0-0c8d-4f6e-9fc0-ae04cc96eaf9@googlegroups.com> <n27nh0$jc8$1@dont-email.me> <n27o1u$gtr$2@speranza.aioe.org> <n27p5c$qjp$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> writes: >Dne 14/11/2015 v 17:38 Ty Knotts napsal(a): >>> Colour is blue only only with human opinion it is blue. >> >> Bullshit, you misunderstood entirely what the monochromatic blue light >> stands for. There is namely NO way having subjective evaluation. This is >> an OBJECTIVE evaluation ONLY. >You do not know what you are talking about. >Calling light from a particular wavelength range blue >is purely human convention, based on majority opinion. >IF as you say being blue is light attribute, >it cannot be changed by human decision. >If we decide blue is above 435 nm instead of current 430 nm, >what happen with "objective" light attribute >of previously violet light with wl 420 nm ? >Will it be still "objectively" violet, >or "objectively" blue already ? I remember reading somewhere how color perception is partly cultural, you learn the "boundaries" when a small child. Specifically, I remember reading how a Korean person would identify a green traffic light as blue, because the boundary between green and blue are at a longer wavelength. Westerners see it as green tinged toward blue (supposedly to help color blind people identify it better). Unfortunately, I don't have a reference for whatever I read, or any Korean people around.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 16:38 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 17:59 +0100
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 17:28 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-14 19:27 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 20:14 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 17:55 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 11:54 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 20:32 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 13:03 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 03:40 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-12-02 17:43 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-12-03 06:10 -0800
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Carl Heinz Krüger <heinzkrueger@ubernetz.org> - 2015-12-03 14:43 +0000
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-03 10:02 -0500
Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-12-03 18:39 -0800
csiph-web