Re: Problem with Dipole Radiation and Relativity

From	Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: Problem with Dipole Radiation and Relativity
Date	2015-10-05 07:39 -0500
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<mutr2q$12k$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(2 earlier) <bscj0b9sreg51md9g68qg2jfflpasdi6ha@4ax.com> <89mdnQUnlpSknZfLnZ2dnUU7_8ydnZ2d@giganews.com> <3i0u0bljhldo5l9ot3qhduo49t3js9ecus@4ax.com> <7vednXLhGJkGlJLLnZ2dnUU7-I0AAAAA@giganews.com> <qro21bdh42m82fj245n89566883mhb0b9a@4ax.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 10/4/2015 12:47 PM, Henry Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 17:47:55 -0500, Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 10/2/15 5:26 PM, HGW wrote:
>>> 'Wavelength' only exists in the frame of the wave itself.
>>
>>
>>    Where did you come up this horseshit, Henry?
>
> Wormey, you should always have confidence that you are not too old to learn
> something new. Imagine you are out in the ocean somewhere and there is a big
> swell. How would you measure the (absolute) distance between wavecrests?
>
> Of course that length DOES exist in all frames and remains consant, which is
> why I used parentheis around the word wavelength.
>

Henry, the word you attempted to type is "parentheses", not to mention 
"constant". You didn't use parentheses around the word wavelength, you 
used single quotes. And I see no connection between the statement that 
that length DOES exist in all frames and the motivation to put single 
quotes around it.

Maybe you shouldn't try to post when you're that drunk.

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Thread

Problem with Dipole Radiation and Relativity Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-09-21 18:05 +0000
  Re: Problem with Dipole Radiation and Relativity Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-09-22 03:04 +0000
  Re: Problem with Dipole Radiation and Relativity Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-09-22 04:42 +0000
  Re: Problem with Dipole Radiation and Relativity Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-09-21 23:54 -0500
    Re: Problem with Dipole Radiation and Relativity Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-09-22 05:28 +0000
  Re: Problem with Dipole Radiation and Relativity Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-09-22 05:02 +0000
  Re: Problem with Dipole Radiation and Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-09-28 12:24 +0200
    Re: Problem with Dipole Radiation and Relativity HGW <xxx@....> - 2015-09-29 07:47 +1000
      Re: Problem with Dipole Radiation and Relativity Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-09-28 22:06 -0500
        Re: Problem with Dipole Radiation and Relativity noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-29 11:31 -0700
          Re: Problem with Dipole Radiation and Relativity noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-29 19:52 -0700
        Re: Problem with Dipole Radiation and Relativity HGW <xxx@....> - 2015-10-03 08:26 +1000
          Re: Problem with Dipole Radiation and Relativity Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 17:47 -0500
            Re: Problem with Dipole Radiation and Relativity Henry Wilson <HW@.....> - 2015-10-05 04:47 +1100
              Re: Problem with Dipole Radiation and Relativity Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-04 18:00 -0500
                Re: Problem with Dipole Radiation and Relativity Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-10-05 09:46 +0200
                Re: Problem with Dipole Radiation and Relativity Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-05 11:48 -0500
                Re: Problem with Dipole Radiation and Relativity Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-10-05 20:19 +0200
                Re: Problem with Dipole Radiation and Relativity Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-05 13:28 -0500
                Re: Problem with Dipole Radiation and Relativity Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-10-05 21:16 +0200
                Re: Problem with Dipole Radiation and Relativity Henry Wilson <HW@.....> - 2015-10-05 20:01 +1100
                Re: Problem with Dipole Radiation and Relativity Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-05 11:52 -0500
                Re: Problem with Dipole Radiation and Relativity Henry Wilson <HW@.....> - 2015-10-06 04:55 +1100
                Re: Problem with Dipole Radiation and Relativity Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 07:59 -0500
                Re: Problem with Dipole Radiation and Relativity noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 11:34 -0700
                Re: Problem with Dipole Radiation and Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-10-06 20:55 +0200
                Re: Problem with Dipole Radiation and Relativity HGW <xxx@....> - 2015-10-07 07:50 +1100
                Re: Problem with Dipole Radiation and Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-10-07 11:15 +0200
                Re: Problem with Dipole Radiation and Relativity HGW <xxx@....> - 2015-10-06 14:52 +1100
                Re: Problem with Dipole Radiation and Relativity Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 19:15 -0500
                Re: Problem with Dipole Radiation and Relativity HGW <xxx@....> - 2015-10-09 07:36 +1100
              Re: Problem with Dipole Radiation and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-10-05 07:39 -0500
                Re: Problem with Dipole Radiation and Relativity Henry Wilson <HW@.....> - 2015-10-06 05:03 +1100
                Re: Problem with Dipole Radiation and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-10-05 14:20 -0500
                Re: Problem with Dipole Radiation and Relativity HGW <xxx@....> - 2015-10-06 15:02 +1100
                Re: Problem with Dipole Radiation and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 07:48 -0500
                Re: Problem with Dipole Radiation and Relativity HGW <xxx@....> - 2015-10-07 07:40 +1100
                Re: Problem with Dipole Radiation and Relativity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 17:59 -0500
                Re: Problem with Dipole Radiation and Relativity Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 19:17 -0500
                Re: Problem with Dipole Radiation and Relativity HGW <xxx@....> - 2015-10-09 07:34 +1100
                transitive property noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-10-08 12:33 -0700
          Re: Problem with Dipole Radiation and Relativity Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-10-08 10:42 -0500
            Re: Problem with Dipole Radiation and Relativity HGW <xxx@....> - 2015-10-09 08:14 +1100
      Re: Problem with Dipole Radiation and Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2015-09-29 11:00 +0200
  Re: Problem with Dipole Radiation and Relativity Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-10-24 00:03 +1100

csiph-web