Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio

From	Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com>
Newsgroups	alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, sci.physics
Subject	Re: 9/11 Fake Witness Exposed + Why Evan Fairbanks video has no audio
Date	2015-09-29 06:30 +0100
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<mud7ic$das$3@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(11 earlier) <mu9vol$a0g$1@pcls7.std.com> <iluh0b51n25pplb419jb4qoudokruieb37@4ax.com> <mubpco$9f2$1@pcls7.std.com> <N5qdnUaoA8sW6JTLnZ2dnUU7-YnOydjZ@giganews.com> <muc2hf$r9n$3@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 28/09/2015 19:58, Tony Dragon wrote:
> On 28/09/2015 18:13, Rocky wrote:
>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message
>> news:mubpco$9f2$1@pcls7.std.com...
>>> "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>>>> Thanks for proving there weren't any nukes there, Rocky!
>>>
>>>>      What is most sad is how many times he's proved nukes weren't
>>>> used, yet is compelled to claim they were.
>>>
>>> Yup.  This time, Rocky has proved once and for all that there were no
>>> nukes,
>>> by using the "duck test".
>>
>> But you have no proof that underground nukes make horendous EMPs.
>>
>> And you have no proof that the ground shaking violently 12 seconds before
>> the North Tower was vaporized was not really a 5.5.
>>
>
> Again, I do not expect you to answer, but can you provide us with, say
> three, seismic signatures of 5.5 during 911.
>

No answer, as expected, Rocky running away again.

>>
>>>   He has also proven that all kookvids contain lies,
>>> because if one witness lies about the Pentagon plane, all NYC witnesses
>>> must
>>> be lying about what they saw.
>>
>> Funny that you can't name just one witness of a jet in Nuke York City and
>> yet there are videos that show of the people that claimed to see a jet in
>> Nuke York City they all claimed to see something different.  <G>
>>
>>
>>>   Applying Rocky's logic, if one kookvid contains
>>> a lie, all kookvids must be lies.  And since I proved the video clip
>>> with
>>> the
>>> crane has been falsified, we now know all kookvids are lies.
>>
>> But you failed to prove who falified it because maybe it was altered
>> after
>> it was released to the public.  And you still failed to address why
>> the wing
>> diappeared like it did in so many other videos.
>>
>>> Since Rocky has proven with the "duck test" that there were no nukes at
>>> the
>>> World Trade Center, and he has also proven that all kookvids are
>>> lies, we
>>> don't even need to continue this discusion at all any more.
>>
>> Keep in mind that to this date there is no legitimate reason for what was
>> left of the Twin Towers to be left standing.
>>
>> Even you tried to say because the very top of the Twin Towers didn't fall
>> straight down no other part of the Twin Towers should have fallen
>> close to
>> straight down either and that was a crock of shit.
>>
>> The fact remains, nothing but an NCD explains what was left of the Twin
>> Towers and why the people below the vaporization range were not
>> crushed or
>> vaporized.  DUH.
>>
>> PLUS YOU HAVE NOT GIVEN US THE RADIATION READINGS AT GZ YET.
>>
>> Rocky
>>
>>
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> http://www.avast.com
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

Thread

csiph-web