Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #522404

Re: 9/11 - The No Plane Theory - True or False?

From moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Newsgroups alt.conspiracy, sci.physics
Subject Re: 9/11 - The No Plane Theory - True or False?
Date 2015-09-21 00:51 +0000
Organization The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989
Message-ID <mtnka7$n8t$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink)
References <SqednVvgG6LJlGLInZ2dnUU7-eOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <mtnc9p$rko$1@pcls7.std.com> <rsidnWQHN8V8q2LInZ2dnUU7-c-dnZ2d@giganews.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
>news:mtnc9p$rko$1@pcls7.std.com...
>> "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:
>>
>>>Believe Your Own Eyes - 9/11 - No "Planes" Were Ever Used.mp4
>>>( Time indexed to start at 25:58 )
>>> https://youtu.be/IL8cJWyOxWQ?t=25m58s
>>
>>Kòóktard, I just proved that clip had obviously been tampered with!

>You did nothing of that sort.  What you would have to do is download the 
>exact same video that he shows he downloaded and I know you didn't do that.

I did download the clip, kooktard.  I had to in order to get the right
still frames.  As I said before, the normal speed video has low resolution
double exposures of the jet in the stills, while the low speed videos
somehow magically got higher resolution non-double exposures!!  How did
that happen!!!  Sorry, kook, you guys were caught!

>> And you go and post another link to it?  How kooktarded is that!

>Not as kooktarded as someone who thinks heavy objects should not fall 
>straight down.  ( your words were "off-center" )  <G>

The top of the building tipped to the side slightly before the collapse.
Thus it was off-center.

>> Do you really still believe that disproven, tampered clip?

>You have just been a shit load of lies including that lie about 95% of 
>Flight 93 was found when the truth is 100% of Flight 93 was found where it 
>landed in Cleveland.  DUH.

You are changing the subject, kook.  Do you still believe the discredited,
tampered clip?

Oh, BTW, it was Delta 1989 that landed in Cleveland that day, not Flight
93.  An air traffic controller heard the Flight 93 hijackers say things
like "We have a bomb on board" and thought it was coming from Delta 1989
so he reported Delta 1989 as hijacked.  The pilot said everything was fine
when queried.  Delta 1989 was ordered to land at Cleveland.  It was held
at gunpoint by the FBI and a SWAT team for a couple hours.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delta_Air_Lines_Flight_1989

>> Shall I now post still images from that clip online so that everyone else
>can laugh at your kooktarded ass?

>And do not forget to notice that the wing disappears right before the CGI 
>enters the South Tower because to date only one person could recreate that 
>abnormally and he did it with 3D software and programmed the wing to reflect 
>the sky.  <G>

It's not hard to erase a wing.  Even a kooktard can do it.
I'll take a look to see if you kooktards did erase a wing (there are still 
three left!) since I still have the download.  I'll post that, too.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

9/11 - The No Plane Theory - True or False? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 14:29 -0500
  Re: Rocky still a delusional kook jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 19:59 +0000
  Re: 9/11 - The No Plane Theory - True or False? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-20 22:34 +0000
    Re: 9/11 - The No Plane Theory - True or False? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 17:43 -0500
      Re: 9/11 - The No Plane Theory - True or False? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 23:00 +0000
      Re: 9/11 - The No Plane Theory - True or False? "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-20 19:21 -0400
        Re: 9/11 - The No Plane Theory - True or False? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 18:39 -0500
          Re: Rocky continues to rave jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-21 00:02 +0000
      Re: 9/11 - The No Plane Theory - True or False? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:28 -0500
      Re: 9/11 - The No Plane Theory - True or False? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-21 00:51 +0000
        Re: 9/11 - The No Plane Theory - True or False? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 07:07 -0500
    Re: 9/11 - The No Plane Theory - True or False? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:27 -0500
      Re: 9/11 - The No Plane Theory - True or False? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-21 14:29 +0000
        Re: 9/11 - The No Plane Theory - True or False? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 11:11 -0500
          Re: 9/11 - The No Plane Theory - True or False? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-21 18:05 +0000
            Re: 9/11 - The No Plane Theory - True or False? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 13:28 -0500
              Re: 9/11 - The No Plane Theory - True or False? Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-21 20:19 +0100
              Re: 9/11 - The No Plane Theory - True or False? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
            Re: 9/11 - The No Plane Theory - True or False? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 16:16 -0500
              Re: 9/11 - The No Plane Theory - True or False? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
            Re: 9/11 - The No Plane Theory - True or False? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
          Re: 9/11 - The No Plane Theory - True or False? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
        Re: 9/11 - The No Plane Theory - True or False? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
  Re: 9/11 - The No Plane Theory - True or False? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:27 -0500

csiph-web