Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #518079

Re: EINSTEIN'S SCIENCE: NOT EVEN INSANE

Show all headers | View raw

<swormley1@gmail.com> "Sam Wormley" the Yiddish
Dingleberry who worships Albert's Sphincter, wrote:
> 
>   Translation -- Trying to understand relativity is driving Pentcho
>   insane. You shouldn't feel bad, Pentcho, as many students have
>   difficulty understanding of time in special relativity: simultaneity
>   and reference frames.
> 
>   Pentcho--See:
> > http://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0207109.pdf?origin=publication_detail
> 
> > This article reports on an investigation of student understanding of
> > the concept of time in special relativity. A series of research tasks
> > are discussed that illustrate, step-by-step, how student reasoning of
> > fundamental concepts of relativity was probed. The results indicate
> > that after standard instruction students at all academic levels have
> > serious difficulties with the relativity of simultaneity and with the
> > role of observers in inertial reference frames. Evidence is presented
> > that suggests many students construct a conceptual framework in which
> > the ideas of absolute simultaneity and the relativity of simultaneity
> > harmoniously co-exist.... about which...
> 
||| Edward Teller, the inventor of the H-Bomb, says:
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vwiayZ3sH7U >
||| "Einstein didn't know what he was talking about..."
||| "...or he was lying, or both".
>
Teller was/is NOT alone with that notion. Other luminaries said:
>
||| Prof. Carver A. Mead of Caltech (a student of Feynman),
||| "It is my firm belief that the 20th century will be
|||characterized in history as the dark ages of physics."
>
||| or F.A Hayek, Nobel laureate, who said: "In the future,
||| Humanity will see in our Epoch an Era of superstition, all
||| associated with the names of Marx, Freud and Einstein"
>
||| or John Beckman, an astronomy professor & Einstein disciple:
||| "The theory of relativity lives on. Is it a true picture of reality?
||| That is probably more a matter of FAITH than of proof."
>
Then there is also this about Relativity which shows that
SR/GR is a pitiful **Physics by hear-say** that needs FAITH
and BELIEF in "observers" which was condemned already
60+ years ago, 2 years before he died, when...
<http://tinyurl.com/Einstein-denied-his-SR-and-GR
in which Albert concluded that:
____ SR is short for STUPID RANT _____ & that
____ GR stands for GULLIBLE RECITAL _____
end cit
>
Ergo, SR&GR is only "observed" today by RETARDS,
kooks, and fanatical but well meaning kikes who yearn
to preserve Einstein's shit as Jewish cultural heritage...
>
Can you admit to that Sam?.... AHAHAHA...ROTFLMAO
>
> -- 
> 
> sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
> to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
> community, and physics-related social issues.
>

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

EINSTEIN'S SCIENCE: NOT EVEN INSANE Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-30 04:56 -0700
  Re: EINSTEIN'S SCIENCE: NOT EVEN INSANE Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-30 09:53 -0700
    Re: EINSTEIN'S SCIENCE: NOT EVEN INSANE Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-30 12:31 -0700
      Re: EINSTEIN'S SCIENCE: NOT EVEN INSANE Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 10:08 -0500
        Re: EINSTEIN'S SCIENCE: NOT EVEN INSANE Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 10:19 -0500
        Re: EINSTEIN'S SCIENCE: NOT EVEN INSANE benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 00:35 -0400
  Re: EINSTEIN'S SCIENCE: NOT EVEN INSANE Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 21:01 -0500
    Re: EINSTEIN'S SCIENCE: NOT EVEN INSANE "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-30 23:47 -0700
  Re: EINSTEIN'S SCIENCE: NOT EVEN INSANE Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-31 06:55 -0700

csiph-web