Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #517986

Re: Ping: Kent Wills: WHERE THE FCUK IS YOUR EVIDENCE?

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 8/30/2015 11:19 AM, Rocky wrote:
> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:mrv6qa$lok$3@dont-email.me...
   On 30/08/2015 13:37, Rocky wrote:
>>> PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE keep a list of your exhibits because T-annoy claimed
>>> he
>>> gave me evidence once that he would not repost and he is a big liar too.
>>>

>> I am not interested in your explanation of the above.
>>
>>> One of the sites I used to prove that there were 3 exit holes at the
>>> Pentagon was changed after they realized it was inconsistent with the
   story
>>> they were trying to tell.  In other words some evidence that we were told
>>> lie after lie after lie about Ground Zero is drying up.
>>>
>>
>> So yet again your evidence 'disappears' how convenient.

> Not all of it disappears but the photo that showed 3 exit holes in the
> Pentagon did.
>

>>> But that does not mean all the evidence that we were lied to about Ground
>>> Zero is drying up because the fact Ground Zero was radioactive has more
>>> supporting evidence now than ever.  <G>

>> What sort of radiation was it?
>> What were the levels of radiation?
>> How was it measured?
>> Who measured it?
>
> I don't care that people have died from it all I want to do is play with
> the details like a kid in a sandbox.  And I can't google "9/11 radiation"
> for myself why?

You Liar Rocky

>
>
>>> There is plenty of evidence that NIST used outright facts in their
>>> "Hypothetical Collapse Initiation Sequence" and I will not deal with
>>> any
>>> of that because in reality I can't.  <G>

>>> I keep posting the same graphic over and over and I will not tell you
>>> exactly what it means to me because to this date only Doimitri K. has
>>> bothered to explain why so much survived of the Twin Towers.
>>>    http://www.FatManBoobie$You.com/wp-content/uploads/Rocky.jpeg

>>> The crap I keep getting about EMPs is clearly bogus because FAA listed
>>> the
>>> data he was using and they were both large airborne nukes and not small
>>> nukes detonated 77 kilometers underground in solid rock.

>>> The deal with the mushroom cloud from the North Tower.  It is inconsistent
>>> with an underground nuke and it is also inconsistent with a nuke that
>>> wasn't
>>> directly under the majority of the smoke-um dope-um.

>>> The fact that the North Tower did not shake so violently 12 seconds before it was
>>> dematerialized by Aliens that it was caught on camera and yet that was not recorded by
>>> the Home Mothers Sewing Group of Sweeden (HMSGS)
>>> UGH tells us the UHS has given Rocky falsified information.  <Poop>

>>> I will go on and on and on and I know that but the point being where
>>> the
>>> fuck you, yes FUCK YOU and your evidence?  <poop>
>>>
>>> Rocky the lying squirrely
>
> Rocky the lying squirrely
>
>

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Ping: Kent Wills: WHERE THE FCUK IS YOUR EVIDENCE? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 07:37 -0500
  Re: Ping: Kent Wills: WHERE THE FCUK IS YOUR EVIDENCE? burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> - 2015-08-30 09:12 -0400
  Re: Ping: Kent Wills: WHERE THE FCUK IS YOUR EVIDENCE? Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-30 16:19 +0100
    Re: Ping: Kent Wills: WHERE THE FCUK IS YOUR EVIDENCE? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 08:28 -0700
    Re: Ping: Kent Wills: WHERE THE FCUK IS YOUR EVIDENCE? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 11:19 -0500
      Re: Ping: Kent Wills: WHERE THE FCUK IS YOUR EVIDENCE? Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-30 23:17 +0100
        c) what he say noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 17:04 -0700
        Re: Ping: Kent Wills: WHERE THE FCUK IS YOUR EVIDENCE? Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 03:37 +0200
      Re: Ping: Kent Wills: WHERE THE FCUK IS YOUR EVIDENCE? gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 17:53 -0500

csiph-web