Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #511180

Re: MAX TEGMARK DISHONEST OR JUST SILLY?

From "hanson" <hanson@quick.net>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: MAX TEGMARK DISHONEST OR JUST SILLY?
Date 2015-08-04 09:55 -0700
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <mpqqpm$7k1$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <76d093f2-cf94-4ee8-9a08-6a1570ec7a3f@googlegroups.com> <lYidnYdjYIOGeF3InZ2dnUU7-LudnZ2d@giganews.com>

Show all headers | View raw


<swormley1@gmail.com> Kike "Sam Wormley" repeats his
heart rendering yearning to save the useless SR as Jewish 
cultural heritage (nothing wrong with that) and so he wrote: 
> 
>    What's false and what's not, is determined by the hard data of
>    observation and experiment. To date, there has NEVER been an
>    observation that contradicts a prediction of special or general
>    relativity. Einstein's relativity remains a fruitful tool of
>    classical physics.
> 
hanson wrote:
Now, Sam, go with that "tool" of yours and see 
whether it's "fruitful" enough to buy you a bagel.
It wont buy you even a crumb of a bagel unless
you show where you have ever encountered even 
one single, real world event, in your personal life 
or career, which you were not able to solve without 
using SR/GR...
>
Ergo, only geriatric Jewish teacher types like you who
 are on their way out, do still hang on to that useless 
shit, even despite the fact that already more then 
60+ years ago, 2 years before he puffed,
>
<http://tinyurl.com/Einstein-denied-his-SR-and-GR>
in which Albert concluded that:
>
____ SR is short for STUPID RANT _____ & that
. ____ GR stands for GULLIBLE RECITAL _____
> 
and  "at a dinner conversation with Eddington, in 1919, 
Einstein moaned that "only 3 people could understand the 
theory of relativity" 
... and Eddington looked at Einstein and asked:
 "and who is going to be the third one?" ... 
Einstein quickly added: "that will be Sam Wormley, although
Sam shits into his pants when he reads that Einstein himself
said that Wormley BELIEVES in the stupid rant of SR & GR.."
>
So, Sam, feel honored and encouraged by your Einstein blessing
(like Glazier, the Swine, feels honored with his letter from the pope)
which should also allow you to brush away these folks below, 
most the Jews, as "not understand/accepting relativity" like when
>
||| Edward Teller, the inventor of the H-Bomb, says:
 <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vwiayZ3sH7U >
||| "Einstein didn't know what he was talking about..."
||| "...or he was lying, or both".
>
Teller was/is NOT alone with that notion. Other luminaries said:
>
||| Prof. Carver A. Mead of Caltech (a student of Feynman),
||| "It is my firm belief that the 20th century will be
|||characterized in history as the dark ages of physics."
>
||| or F.A Hayek, Nobel laureate, who said: "In the future,
||| Humanity will see in our Epoch an Era of superstition, all
||| associated with the names of Marx, Freud and Einstein"
>
||| or John Beckman, an astronomy professor & Einstein disciple:
||| "The theory of relativity lives on. Is it a true picture of reality?
||| That is probably more a matter of FAITH than of proof."
>
Then there is also this about Relativity which shows that
SR/GR is a pitiful **Physics by hear-say** that needs FAITH
and BELIEF in "observers" which was condemned already
60+ years ago, 2 years before he died, when...
<http://tinyurl.com/Einstein-denied-his-SR-and-GR
in which Albert concluded that:
____ SR is short for STUPID RANT _____ & that
____ GR stands for GULLIBLE RECITAL _____
end cit
>
Ergo, SR&GR is only "observed" today by RETARDS,
kooks, deranged kikes who yearn to preserve Einstein's
shit as Jewish heritage... ahahaha... like you the c+p-ing
Jew Sam Wormey and his schizophrenic understudy,
Swine Glazier, the Face Shitter & Graveyard vandal does,
who also, in stereotypical Jew fashion, trumped Einstein
with his "G=EMC^2" that Glazier stole off a farmer's barn.
>

>

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

MAX TEGMARK DISHONEST OR JUST SILLY? Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-04 07:52 -0700
  Re: MAX TEGMARK DISHONEST OR JUST SILLY? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 11:15 -0500
    Re: MAX TEGMARK DISHONEST OR JUST SILLY? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-04 09:55 -0700
  Re: MAX TEGMARK DISHONEST OR JUST SILLY? Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-04 11:14 -0700
    Re: MAX TEGMARK DISHONEST OR JUST SILLY? Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-06 08:13 -0700
      just sylli noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 11:54 -0700

csiph-web