Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #511015

Re: PBS calls HVAC stooopid!

Show all headers | View raw

<nobody@gmail.com> "benj" wrote:
> hanson wrote:
>>
<nobody@gmail.com> "benj" wrote:
PBS. A recent program on Uranium and nuclear energy. But PBS considered
Nukes for "Green" power and concluded that  Tons and tons of highly
radioactive waste that stays that way for 100,000 years. Who is going to
guarantee that it stays safe that long.  The conclusion on PBS is that m
nobody needs Nukes for safe green power. Windmills and tulips are working
just fine.
>>>
hanson wrote:
AFAIAC, the 1st hour of Derek Muller's "Uranium.. 'Twisting
the Dragon'" was an excellent, well balanced presentation from
Uranium's discovery to its use in Hiroshima, without the usual
overbearing, excessive and made up self promotion of kikes.
>>>
The second hour though was too long and too heavy on
the Greenism of Radiation Danger. And there was just a
very short episode of what to do with the Rad-waste,
>>>
which included Leslie Dewan Transatomic reactors that are 
supposed "to >> convert and use up all the 270,000 metric
tons of waste that exists today into enough carbon-free 
electricity to power the world for 72 years"
>>>
By the year 2025, Transatomic Inc. intends to have its first 
commercial plant up and running
>>>
<https://www.google.com/search?q=Leslie+Dewan+Reactor&ie>
>>>
The usual pro and con banter with the for/against of the 1960
similar type U233 & Th-232  reactors is already in full awing, which is
a good thing.
> 
Benj wrote:
Left unmentioned, Hanson, is the true fact that the reason all reactors 
are uranium rather than thorium is that Uranium reactors make atomic 
bomb materials and Thorium ones don't. Hence the great safety and 
minimal waste of Breeders had to be ignored. Hey, do you want to live in 
a safe, peaceful, advanced civilization or rule the world? No question 
what the answer to that one is.
> 
hanson wrote:
Right, your last 2 sentences are the operative ones. The USA and the
Soviet USSR where beginning their long Cold War, which intensified
after US kikes (Julius Rosenberg etc) betrayed the USA and gave the
A-bomb secrets to Stalin. Once he had the Bomb also, both sides 
needed feverishly Pu-239 to manufacture a total of some 60'000 A & H 
bombs, to get to their MAD (Mutual Assured Destruction) mentality & 
policy.
>
The raw Pu-239 material for the bombs came from the U-235 reactors.  
One of the curious side shows was the use of "Depleted U-238" in 
gun projectiles that were used in the Gulf wars, both of which were 
instigated by US kikes...
>
Benj wrote:
The injection of Green propaganda into the last half of the Uranium 
program just shows how politics has taken over science. But then since 
this was PBS, we are lucky that only HALF the program was propaganda.
> 
Actually I only saw the last part when I wrote that post and then went 
back later and viewed the whole thing to discovered that it really 
started out reasonable and only ran off the tracks at the end. But the 
rule in propaganda is that most people only remember the headlines, 
pictures, and last sentence.  
And so it goes.
> 
hanson wrote:
If you, Benj, have the reaction equations of the above mentioned 
"Transatomic Reactors" please post them.
>
And another sidebar is that the term "transatomic" conjures up an
interesting "forbidden subject", namely "transmutation of elements".
>
The traditionalists, especially Einstein Dingleberries and QMassters
cite the energy of cosmic rays, their particle chart & highfaluting 
theories, and insist that the Muon's life time 'proves' SR... and 
stop at that, completely disregarding how eons of cosmic radiation
has "transmuted" a SAMLL portion of elements in the soil.
>
Past inability, lack of detection sensitivity, for such reaction deposits
in the soil have denied them the 'scientific' proof. Understandable tho
when considering the miniscule amount of such transmuted matter 
created by cosmic radiation, given that the few new atoms are mixed
into a Mol of dirt, e.g. ca. 2-3 oz, that contains 6E23 atoms.
>
What is amazing is not the sorry denial by the Einstein
Dingleberries and the parroting of their kooky coat tail riders, 
but the intuition of the peasantry and its alchemists who 
suspected that such transmutation events must occur... 
>
similar to the prognostication of the existance of Atoms 
which was proclaimed since antiquity, but only officially 
accepted by the "scientific" establishment in 1929 when 
Perrin got the Nobel prize for his "discovery" of atoms... 
>
'These then are just 2 examples of interaction of the human mind
with non-sentient matter, but there is a far wider range of such
phenomena when one goes past the usual symbiotic relations
between humans and domesticated animals or even lover 
organisms, whose excretions are used by humans in exchange
for humans who must feed and house them.... And so it goes.

. 

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

PBS calls HVAC stooopid! benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-29 23:46 -0400
  Re: PBS calls HVAC stooopid! benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-02 02:14 -0400
    Re: PBS calls HVAC stooopid! "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-03 11:21 -0700
  Re: PBS calls HVAC stooopid! "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-01 17:16 -0700

csiph-web