Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #509545
| From | R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: New paper by prominent scientists suggests ocean levels will rise much faster than predicted |
| Date | 2015-07-26 07:53 +0000 |
| Organization | SDF Public Access UNIX System, Est. 1987 |
| Message-ID | <mp23ll$reb$1@odin.sdf-eu.org> (permalink) |
| References | <5Mqdnfq6UuUPnS7InZ2dnUVZ5vqdnZ2d@giganews.com> <19nb8c-c3q.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <O7CdnTjBmI-EJS7InZ2dnUVZ5uWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <mp0f9h$qbk$1@speranza.aioe.org> <d1jf72F4s8rU1@mid.individual.net> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
In sci.physics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote: > Am 25.07.2015 18:59, schrieb Fritz K?hler: >> Sam Wormley wrote: >>> New paper by prominent scientists suggests ocean levels will rise >>> much faster than predicted >>>> http://phys.org/news/2015-07-paper-prominent-scientists-ocean- >> faster.html >> So what, is this bad too?? More water can't be bad. Gives more fish. Fish >> taste good, cod liver oil enough to everybody. > Well, that's not true: higher sea levels do not give more fish. > Reason: the level of water above the sea floor is (on average) very > large. If this distance would increase a few centimetre, this wouldn't > extend the living space for fish significantly. > But the sea levels are falling (on average), by a rate of about 4m per > millennium. > This could be estimated from the current lake near the Airport > Fiomicino. The Lake Tiberius was formerly the harbour of Rome, but is > now 8m above sea level. Unfortunately your musing don't correlate well with regognised publications. E.g. the Med SLR reconstruction for the past 150ky is <http://www.skepticalscience.com/pics/nature11593RapidCoupling.jpg> (the blue line in lower panel) This seems to show SL in the Med rose by 4m over the past 25k years and within the last 1k seems to have flat-lined. Fimicino is still on the coastline and the city fathers record it as 1m above sea level. The port of Hobart, Tasmania, is 10-40m above sea level yet ships reach it from the sea every day. The upper reaches of the Mississippi are 100m above sea level, yet it could be reached by ship from the sea before various straightening and lock-building exercises were carried out in the 19th and 20th cent. > Since the harbour had sea-level at the time of ancient Rome (roughly > 2000 years ago), the sea-level has fallen by 8 m in 2000 years or 4 m in > a millennium. > Other ways to estimate the same results would be: > - analysing the age of corals on the current land of atolls > - determine the age of marine fossils on mountains > - hight of ancient harbours above the sea > - age of ocean-related human artefacts in current mountains -- Homes Under Threat As Wildfires Rage In West Sky News, 24 Jul 2015 12:14Z Holidaymakers flee and houses are at risk after separate wildfires threaten communities in Washington, Montana and California. Investors could lose $4.2tn because of climate change, report warns ... The Guardian, 24 Jul 2015 18:12Z Investors could lose $4.2tn due to impact of climate change, report warns. Investments in fossil fuel companies face serious risk from global warming, research by the Economist Intelligence Unit shows. The future is grim for private holdings in fossil ... Witness Talks Huron Tornado KELOLAND TV, 24 Jul 2015 23:14Z From funnel cloud to touch down, a Huron woman says she will not forget seeing an actual tornado. Thursday night's twister south of Huron near State Highway 37 damaged buildings as well as power lines. 'Brain-Eating' Amoeba Reappears in Louisiana Parish's Water Supply ABC News, 24 Jul 2015 23:16Z A potentially deadly amoeba has been found in the water supply of a parish outside New Orleans for the second time in two years, officials said.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
New paper by prominent scientists suggests ocean levels will rise much faster than predicted Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 21:20 -0600
Re: New paper by prominent scientists suggests ocean levels will rise much faster than predicted Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 10:23 -0600
Re: New paper by prominent scientists suggests ocean levels will rise much faster than predicted Fritz Köhler <fritzk@notrenetwork.net> - 2015-07-25 16:59 +0000
Re: New paper by prominent scientists suggests ocean levels will rise much faster than predicted Fritz Köhler <fritzk@notrenetwork.net> - 2015-07-25 17:01 +0000
Re: New paper by prominent scientists suggests ocean levels will rise much faster than predicted Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-07-26 09:06 +0200
Re: New paper by prominent scientists suggests ocean levels will rise much faster than predicted R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2015-07-26 07:53 +0000
Re: New paper by prominent scientists suggests ocean levels will rise much faster than predicted Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-07-29 03:47 +0200
Re: New paper by prominent scientists suggests ocean levels will rise much faster than predicted Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-01 05:24 +0200
Re: New paper by prominent scientists suggests ocean levels will rise much faster than predicted Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-07-28 23:03 +0200
Re: New paper by prominent scientists suggests ocean levels will rise much faster than predicted jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-07-28 21:22 +0000
Re: New paper by prominent scientists suggests ocean levels will rise much faster than predicted Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-07-28 14:54 -0700
Re: New paper by prominent scientists suggests ocean levels will rise much faster than predicted jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-07-28 22:09 +0000
Re: New paper by prominent scientists suggests ocean levels will rise much faster than predicted jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-07-25 17:02 +0000
Re: New paper by prominent scientists suggests ocean levels will rise much faster than predicted Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 13:51 -0600
les trois lettres noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 13:01 -0700
Re: New paper by prominent scientists suggests ocean levels will rise much faster than predicted jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-07-25 20:07 +0000
Re: New paper by prominent scientists suggests ocean levels will rise much faster than predicted benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-29 00:05 -0400
Re: New paper by prominent scientists suggests ocean levels will rise much faster than predicted "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 11:23 -0700
Re: New paper by prominent scientists suggests ocean levels will rise much faster than predicted HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 16:11 -0400
Re: New paper by prominent scientists suggests ocean levels will rise much faster than predicted Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 14:27 -0600
Re: New paper by prominent scientists suggests ocean levels will rise much faster than predicted benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 16:32 -0400
Re: New paper by prominent scientists suggests ocean levels will rise much faster than predicted "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-07-25 13:40 -0700
Re: New paper by prominent scientists suggests ocean levels will rise much faster than predicted "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-07-25 13:37 -0700
Re: New paper by prominent scientists suggests ocean levels will rise much faster than predicted "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-01 15:36 -0700
csiph-web