Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #603926

Re: Particle Twins Good Idea

From jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Particle Twins Good Idea
Date 2016-11-06 22:12 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <lfm4fd-g3e.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References (5 earlier) <76a7204a-2021-4abd-9707-69b7efb0d563@googlegroups.com> <st2ied-5hb.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <33d9fa1c-0b2f-4612-a56f-bc982401ec3b@googlegroups.com> <12916dd7-580a-4db2-bb4d-71866dc1ddf6@googlegroups.com> <1c696913-5f43-46ba-b6c0-b47b68664d24@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, November 6, 2016 at 11:21:10 AM UTC-8, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
>> On Monday, October 31, 2016 at 2:14:36 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote:
>> > On Sunday, October 30, 2016 at 2:01:08 PM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> > > Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> wrote:
>> > > > On Saturday, October 29, 2016 at 5:01:06 PM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> > > >> reber g=emc^2 <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >> > On Friday, October 28, 2016 at 2:46:16 PM UTC-7, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> > > >> >> reber g=emc^2 <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >> >> > On Thursday, October 27, 2016 at 11:26:10 AM UTC-7, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
>> > > >> >> >> On Wednesday, October 26, 2016 at 11:11:08 AM UTC-7, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
>> > > >> >> >> > When seeing into QM and saying there goes a single particle its in reality two.This is part a theory I've had for 68 years.It answers hard questions,as a good theory should.I have merged it with two other theories and they fit. TreBert
>> > > >> >> >> 
>> > > >> >> >> Will give a talk at Fullerton State on my 5 best theories,only if they are interested in my theories.So far not sure.Go figure  TreBert
>> > > >> >> > 
>> > > >> >> > Fullerton has to up grade its teachers.That is a given.TreBert
>> > > >> >> 
>> > > >> >> What Fullerton teachers would that be?
>> > > >> >> 
>> > > >> >> 
>> > > >> >> -- 
>> > > >> >> Jim Pennino
>> > > >> > 
>> > > >> > The ones that do not allow students to do some of their own thinking.Einstein had teaches like those in Fullerton.He fought back.Same as me. Trebert
>> > > >> 
>> > > >> Which institution in Fullerton would that be?
>> > > >> 
>> > > >> They only thing you have fought back against was having an honest job and
>> > > >> paying your bills.
>> > > >> 
>> > > >> 
>> > > >> -- 
>> > > >> Jim Pennino
>> > > > 
>> > > > 
>> > > > What class did you teach at Fullerton College?  Economics? 
>> > > > 
>> > > > Double-A
>> > > 
>> > > Basic electronics; Fullerton College is a community college and the
>> > > classes were usually a mix of those intending to become technicians
>> > > with a 2 year degree and those intending to transfer to a 4 year college
>> > > and become engineers.
>> > > 
>> > > The challenge was strking a balance between leaving the wannabe techs
>> > > with little math in the dust and boring the wannabe engineers taking
>> > > calculus to tears.
>> > >  
>> > > 
>> > > -- 
>> > > Jim Pennino
>> > 
>> > 
>> > I spent my first two college years at a community college, so I understand well the environment.  It was the best two years of my college life!
>> > 
>> > Double-A
>> 
>> AA Been ask to explain my method on pictures stopping beam of light in mid air and my 5 best theories next week. That means after Nov.8th and I lose big time I still am popular. Never did get my name and picture in the school papers.O well  TreBert
> 
> 
> Why not try to get a paid position teaching a class at that college?  I mean if they can have classes on astrology and yoga (I'll bet they do.), why not Glazierian physics?
> 
> Double-A
 
You mean other than the lack of verifiable credentials and the inablility
to pass a background check?

BTW Fullerton College does have a yoga class under physical education
courses but no astrology.


-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Particle Twins Good Idea "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-10-26 11:11 -0700
  Re: Particle Twins Good Idea "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-10-26 16:14 -0700
  Re: Particle Twins Good Idea "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-10-27 11:26 -0700
    Re: Particle Twins Good Idea HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-10-27 12:13 -0700
    Re: Particle Twins Good Idea "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-10-27 12:40 -0700
    Re: Particle Twins Good Idea jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-27 20:57 +0000
    Re: Particle Twins Good Idea "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-10-28 14:02 -0700
      Re: Particle Twins Good Idea jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-28 21:44 +0000
        Re: Particle Twins Good Idea "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-10-29 12:30 -0700
          Re: Particle Twins Good Idea "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-10-29 13:29 -0700
          Re: Particle Twins Good Idea jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-29 23:56 +0000
            Re: Particle Twins Good Idea Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-10-30 12:08 -0700
              Re: Particle Twins Good Idea jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-30 20:48 +0000
                Re: Particle Twins Good Idea Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-10-31 14:14 -0700
                Re: Particle Twins Good Idea "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 11:21 -0800
                Re: Particle Twins Good Idea Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-11-06 13:33 -0800
                Re: Particle Twins Good Idea jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-06 22:12 +0000
                Re: Particle Twins Good Idea "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 10:42 -0800
                Re: Particle Twins Good Idea jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-07 19:48 +0000
                Re: Particle Twins Good Idea "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 10:38 -0800
                Re: Particle Twins Good Idea HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 11:56 -0800
                Re: Particle Twins Good Idea Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-11-07 13:16 -0800
                Re: Particle Twins Good Idea "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-08 13:09 -0800
                Re: Particle Twins Good Idea Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-11-08 14:23 -0800
  Re: Particle Twins Good Idea "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-10-29 13:11 -0700
    Re: Particle Twins Good Idea "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-10-29 13:35 -0700

csiph-web