Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #522707

Re: In California, a Paltry Snowpack Not Seen in Centuries

Show all headers | View raw

reber g=emc^2 <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Monday, September 21, 2015 at 3:29:14 PM UTC-7, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
>> On Sunday, September 20, 2015 at 2:39:31 PM UTC-7, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
>> > On Tuesday, September 15, 2015 at 5:58:13 AM UTC-7, Sam Wormley wrote:
>> > > In California, a Paltry Snowpack Not Seen in Centuries
>> > > > http://www.climatecentral.org/news/california-centuries-low-snowpack-19448
>> > > 
>> > > > They used two separate tree ring data sets that had been previously
>> > > > published, one that indicated changes in precipitation over time, and
>> > > > the other temperature. (Trees grow less in times of lean
>> > > > precipitation, and some trees can be sensitive to spikes and drops in
>> > > > temperatures.)
>> > > >
>> > > > Based on the 500-year record the team had, they calculated that the
>> > > > odds of such a low snowpack happening more than once over that time
>> > > > period were less than 5 percent, Trouet said. They estimated the
>> > > > return period for such a low snowpack at 1 in 3,100 years, but with a
>> > > > large amount of uncertainty attached to that, because of the inherent
>> > > > uncertainty in such historic records. (The return time also varied
>> > > > with elevation, happening more often at higher elevations than at
>> > > > lower ones.)
>> > > >
>> > > 
>> > >    The question everyone is asking--will the jimp see the word
>> > >    "uncertainty" and try to invalidate the validity of the tree ring
>> > >    data over the last 500 years.
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > 
>> > > -- 
>> > > 
>> > > sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
>> > > to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
>> > > community, and physics-related social issues.
>> > 
>> > After this 100F weekend LA is ready for the Glazier Glacier.Even if used only to keep Bud on ice its worth every penny. Only cost is towing.Bud light might pick up the bill.
>> 
>> That tiny ice pack is melted away.t is hotter now than in July.LA is the center for global warming in the USA.All rain is east.All fresh water is east.All pretty girls are west.That is why "Go West is best"  O Ya  TreBert
> 
> Its hot no clouds no rain.Snow is a thing of the past.People this winter will go to Boston to see it snow.I left before it got 9 feet.My high rise van would be covered.Sking on Balda is a sport in the past. No gold  to pan.It does have lots of lucky nuggets that can sell for $5 each. TreBert

With an expected high of 66 F, Mt Baldy in the Summer is indeed lacking
in snow.


-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

In California, a Paltry Snowpack Not Seen in Centuries Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 07:58 -0500
  Re: In California, a Paltry Snowpack Not Seen in Centuries jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-15 17:40 +0000
  Re: In California, a Paltry Snowpack Not Seen in Centuries gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-15 13:13 -0500
    see my other item, not by poor aBu noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 18:07 -0700
  Re: In California, a Paltry Snowpack Not Seen in Centuries Boris Mohar <borism_void_@sympatico.ca> - 2015-09-16 09:18 -0400
  Re: In California, a Paltry Snowpack Not Seen in Centuries "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 14:39 -0700
    Re: In California, a Paltry Snowpack Not Seen in Centuries "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 15:29 -0700
      Re: In California, a Paltry Snowpack Not Seen in Centuries "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 11:58 -0700
        Re: In California, a Paltry Snowpack Not Seen in Centuries jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-22 19:26 +0000
        Re: In California, a Paltry Snowpack Not Seen in Centuries Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-09-22 16:08 -0700
          Re: In California, a Paltry Snowpack Not Seen in Centuries jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-22 23:21 +0000
          Re: In California, a Paltry Snowpack Not Seen in Centuries "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-09-22 19:32 -0700
        Re: In California, a Paltry Snowpack Not Seen in Centuries "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 15:11 -0700
          Re: In California, a Paltry Snowpack Not Seen in Centuries "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-09-26 13:17 -0700
            Re: In California, a Paltry Snowpack Not Seen in Centuries noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-26 17:21 -0700

csiph-web