Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #559365
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Why Moist Air Reduces Aerodynamic Lift (by James McGinn) |
| Date | 2016-03-04 22:12 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <grdpqc-qpc.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <rrednT_Y2fLDekTLnZ2dnUU7-LudnZ2d@giganews.com> <3234f4da-4a1a-4b2f-b461-f5a868abfe91@googlegroups.com> <85f6cd81-231f-4e22-8a11-bcb0701b967d@googlegroups.com> <nbcua1$r43$1@gioia.aioe.org> <764e37b3-ecda-42d0-9d6e-03ecdce32584@googlegroups.com> |
James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 1:22:15 PM UTC-8, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 3/4/2016 3:17 PM, edprochak@gmail.com wrote: >> > JM, your question is a version of the >> > "When did you stop beating your wife?" >> > question. So it is basically useless in an intelligent discussion. >> > >> > here is the question I keep asking you: >> > Where did you get your degree in Physics? >> > ed >> >> I think you will find that there are several people here who claim to be >> physicists because they are doing what they think physicists do. This >> does not hinge on whether physicists would agree with them. >> >> One of the common behaviors with such people are statements like, "I am >> the only TRUE physicist here" or "Most self-styled physicists don't know >> any longer what being a physicist really means" or "The vast majority of >> the science community are deluded sheep, but there are a few of us still >> remaining that are free thinkers and still truly do science" or "A real >> physicist doubts everything" or "Pieces of paper or cheap credentials do >> not a physicist make." > > What do you think it indicates when you avoid discussing the subject > in the subject heading? That your subject heading is bat shit crazy. -- Jim Pennino
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Why Moist Air Reduces Aerodynamic Lift (by James McGinn) "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 10:29 -0800
Re: Why Moist Air Reduces Aerodynamic Lift (by James McGinn) Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 10:36 -0800
Re: Why Moist Air Reduces Aerodynamic Lift (by James McGinn) Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 13:43 -0600
Re: Why Moist Air Reduces Aerodynamic Lift (by James McGinn) Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 11:48 -0800
Re: Why Moist Air Reduces Aerodynamic Lift (by James McGinn) Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 13:51 -0600
Re: Why Moist Air Reduces Aerodynamic Lift (by James McGinn) Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 12:08 -0800
Re: Why Moist Air Reduces Aerodynamic Lift (by James McGinn) edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-03-04 13:17 -0800
Re: Why Moist Air Reduces Aerodynamic Lift (by James McGinn) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 15:22 -0600
Re: Why Moist Air Reduces Aerodynamic Lift (by James McGinn) James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 13:39 -0800
Re: Why Moist Air Reduces Aerodynamic Lift (by James McGinn) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-04 22:12 +0000
Re: Why Moist Air Reduces Aerodynamic Lift (by James McGinn) James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 13:42 -0800
Re: Why Moist Air Reduces Aerodynamic Lift (by James McGinn) James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 13:38 -0800
Re: Why Moist Air Reduces Aerodynamic Lift (by James McGinn) "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 15:05 -0800
Re: Why Moist Air Reduces Aerodynamic Lift (by James McGinn) Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 17:28 -0600
Re: Why Moist Air Reduces Aerodynamic Lift (by James McGinn) HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 18:57 -0800
Re: Why Moist Air Reduces Aerodynamic Lift (by James McGinn) "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 15:05 -0800
csiph-web