Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #572181
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
| Newsgroups | alt.astronomy, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes |
| Date | Thu, 21 Apr 2016 19:41:02 -0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 147 |
| Sender | Jim Pennino <jimp@mail.specsol.com> |
| Message-ID | <evmnuc-i96.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | <vY6dnQCAQOwlIWfLnZ2dnUU7-f0AAAAA@giganews.com> <2d18uc-jfd.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <UMudnXyGseIXlY7KnZ2dnUU7-dPNnZ2d@giganews.com> <htibuc-lvo.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <Q7qdneBggab83I7KnZ2dnUU7-dHNnZ2d@giganews.com> <jatcuc-b2.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <JMOdnaRSSbHSPIvKnZ2dnUU7-RvNnZ2d@giganews.com> <maliuc-2vi.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <XqSdnbmzB-swiITKnZ2dnUU7-eHNnZ2d@giganews.com> <3finuc-mr5.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <m6OdnXC7BLb6vITKnZ2dnUU7-UPNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| Injection-Info | mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="db4120ef82bbc153014637d4cd15a795"; logging-data="13672"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/ewAG6JVJQQ4O4307BIBol" |
| User-Agent | tin/2.2.1-20140504 ("Tober an Righ") (UNIX) (SunOS/5.10 (i86pc)) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:mLxTUXMzfEu7p4aczqCk75bJeY8= |
| Xref | csiph.com alt.astronomy:284239 sci.physics:572181 |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:3finuc-mr5.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>> news:maliuc-2vi.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:jatcuc-b2.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:htibuc-lvo.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:2d18uc-jfd.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>> news:80h5uc-r65.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:r525uc-nl3.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:7an2uc-67p.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:lob0uc-ndh.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:7b50uc-ipg.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:vdrvtc-9of.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure you can; no seismic readings from a hackjammer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> few >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hundred feet away. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So don't forget even the seismic records that you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prove >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something very unusual about the destruction of three >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> buildings >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> World >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trade Center because they are much smaller than they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the size buildings that went down or were supposed to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gone >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> down >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ended up floating away instead. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope, nothing unusual about the readings at all. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Funny how you do not have any supporting evidence. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You mean other than the seismograph readings that showed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nothing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unusual? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Numbers dude, where are your numbers and then compare >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Posted many times before by many people. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bullshit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope and noted by many other people.' >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BULLSHIT >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, you just didn't want to acknowlege it. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> YOU NEVER DID A COMPARISON WITH OTHER BUILDINGS >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Such was done in the text that accompanied the data. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Funny how you don't have a message ID to support your bullshit. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Why in the world would I keep track of message IDs to kooks? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Also the first time such was posted is well over a year ago now, >>>>>>>>>> but >>>>>>>>>> it has been posted many times. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Or you could do a google search. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What was NOT posted was the seismic readings for WTC7 and a >>>>>>>>> comparison >>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>> the destruction of other buildings. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sure it was. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Fact remains the Seismic records for when WTC1 and WTC2 hit the >>>>>>> ground >>>>>>> are >>>>>> >>>>>> Exactly what one would expect. >>>>> >>>>> So you expected WTC7 to hit the ground with the same force and energy >>>>> as >>>>> a >>>>> Jackhammer? Wow? >>>> >>>> Nope, that is your delusion that jackhammers have any energy. >>> >>> There were no S-waves or P-waves from WTC7 >> >> Of course there wasn't; to expect them would be extremely stupid at best. > > And you are also saying that the surface waves of WTC7's destruction were > supposed to be comparable to a jackhammer too? Of course not; that would be stupid, much like your including the same link eleven times. -- Jim Pennino
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-12 17:38 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-12 23:08 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-13 15:24 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-13 20:37 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-14 07:20 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-14 17:55 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-14 15:49 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-14 22:08 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-15 08:22 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-15 21:00 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-16 22:52 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-17 05:18 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-17 02:54 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-17 17:21 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-19 16:21 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-19 21:42 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-21 13:02 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-21 18:24 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-21 13:52 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-21 19:41 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-21 14:49 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-21 20:05 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-21 15:23 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-21 20:53 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-21 16:04 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-21 21:24 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-22 13:05 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-22 20:52 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-28 14:08 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-28 19:48 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-18 03:04 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-18 07:23 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-18 14:40 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-19 16:31 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-20 14:26 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-21 11:25 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-21 18:53 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-21 14:12 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-13 14:26 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-13 15:28 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-13 21:39 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-14 11:07 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-14 17:36 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-14 15:54 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-15 14:12 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-15 13:39 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-18 03:00 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-18 07:27 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-18 14:30 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-19 16:29 -0500
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-20 14:19 +0000
Re: Why You Should Care About Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-21 11:34 -0500
csiph-web