Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #644772
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Perpetual Motion of Water in Electric Field |
| Date | 2017-08-06 19:33 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <euo62rFfrjaU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <fedf44d8-7a8d-435f-95ac-edac0b086d39@googlegroups.com> <eul0fhFo9hnU1@mid.individual.net> <3c6e19cb-ad26-43fe-a710-6e3c63855942@googlegroups.com> <eulvqjFo45U1@mid.individual.net> <578011e3-678b-42e2-9e50-36622a7077b0@googlegroups.com> |
On 6/08/2017 5:27 PM, Pentcho Valev wrote: > On Saturday, August 5, 2017 at 4:34:18 PM UTC+3, Sylvia Else wrote: >> On 5/08/2017 5:26 PM, Pentcho Valev wrote: >>> >>> The effects are most expressed when the conductivity is minimal, and diminish as the conductivity increases. Note that the vigorous motion starts in the bulk, before the bridge is formed - this cannot be caused by a small electric current: >> >> Bearing in mind that this is being shown in slow motion, the initial >> movement can be attributed to the initial application of the electric >> field, and the capacitance between the containers. >> >> Thereafter, the current of 0.5mA is with a voltage of 10kV is 5 watts, >> so far from negligible. > > The "initial movement" is the important effect, and it is obviously present all along. Things settle down after a while. > The small current can be regarded as a contamination. If, for instance, the current (conductivity) increases, the bridge is destroyed. Now I have to wonder what you've been smoking. Sylvia.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Perpetual Motion of Water in Electric Field Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-08-04 02:07 -0700
Re: Perpetual Motion of Water in Electric Field Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-04 20:25 +1000
Re: Perpetual Motion of Water in Electric Field "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-08-04 10:10 -0700
Re: Perpetual Motion of Water in Electric Field James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2017-08-04 10:46 -0700
Re: Perpetual Motion of Water in Electric Field "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-08-04 14:38 -0700
Re: Perpetual Motion of Water in Electric Field benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-04 18:17 -0400
Re: Perpetual Motion of Water in Electric Field Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-08-04 11:33 -0700
Re: Perpetual Motion of Water in Electric Field Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-05 14:39 +1000
Re: Perpetual Motion of Water in Electric Field Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-08-05 00:26 -0700
Re: Perpetual Motion of Water in Electric Field Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-05 23:34 +1000
Re: Perpetual Motion of Water in Electric Field Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-08-06 00:27 -0700
Re: Perpetual Motion of Water in Electric Field Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-08-06 19:33 +1000
Re: Perpetual Motion of Water in Electric Field benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-08-05 21:14 -0400
Re: Perpetual Motion of Water in Electric Field Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-08-04 11:36 -0700
csiph-web