Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #516909
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Turn off Win10 upgrade for Win7 |
| Message-ID | <ee87f985aec8e7380b54e9c751f50edd@dizum.com> (permalink) |
| Date | 2015-08-26 03:12 +0200 |
| Newsgroups | alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics |
| Organization | dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\WindowsUpdate DWORD: DisableOSUpgrade = 1 You might have to create the 'WindowsUpdate' key, in addition to the 'DisableOSUpgrade' DWORD. Now you'll never even see any Win10 "updates" in Windows Update, including all the telemetry phone-home shit MS installs in KB2952664, KB3021917, KB3035583, KB3068708, KB3075249 and KB3080149 in preparation for installing Win10. You also won't see the nag to upgrade to Windows 10. Yer welcome. -- ------------------------------------ Michael Scott Guthrie (aka Rocky) 336-643-6611 6913 Maynard Road Summerfield, NC 27358-9206 Now that everyone knows who you are, they can get you the psychiatric help you so desperately need. Perhaps they could call your mother Paula S. Guthrie, given that you're in your 30's and you still live at home with mommy... and Grandma Martha. LOL Your brother Scott certainly won't be happy to know you're embarrassing the Guthrie family name, how's he gonna find real estate clients if everyone knows the Guthries are a pack of schizo kooks? LOL Just how many backwoods redneck hillbillies can fit in one small 1200 sf 3bd/1.5 ba house?! Does RockyRetard share a bedroom with his brother? Or do they make Grandma Martha sleep on the porch? LOL ------------------------------------ Michael Guthrie (aka Rocky), your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility... saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode, where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP") and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL H) Your brain becoming more and more broken, in just one short day it moved from G) above to now telling you there are *more* than 34 nukes. Where does your broken brain stop, Ko0k? Billions of intelligent nano-nukes covering every metal surface of the twin towers? Robot "crisis actors" able to withstand the extreme radiation? All of NYC being blow up, replaced by a CGI that we all are fooled by today? LOL IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Turn off Win10 upgrade for Win7 Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 03:12 +0200
Re: Turn off Win10 upgrade for Win7 gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 22:44 -0500
Re: Turn off Win10 upgrade for Win7 "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-08-26 10:33 -0500
Re: Turn off Win10 upgrade for Win7 "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 09:22 -0700
Re: Turn off Win10 upgrade for Win7 Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 19:27 +0200
Re: Turn off Win10 upgrade for Win7 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:20 -0500
Re: Turn off Win10 upgrade for Win7 Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-27 17:08 +0200
Re: Turn off Win10 upgrade for Win7 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 20:05 -0500
Re: Turn off Win10 upgrade for Win7 "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:20 -0500
Re: Turn off Win10 upgrade for Win7 Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 19:27 +0200
csiph-web