Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #586128
| Path | csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.kamp.net!newsfeed.kamp.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Magnets repel more weakly than attract |
| Date | Wed, 22 Jun 2016 15:57:47 +1000 |
| Lines | 39 |
| Message-ID | <dsunmrFl347U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <dd7e9be5-ee3b-4f09-976a-7233ebaec6c1@googlegroups.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | individual.net PHzDJQNSaoaBwOxKMztOJQIK8thrE3lg/pSR1uMQ+VGI1VfIM3 |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:HqsaYsylhBdJg9r+cUx+AK6vESA= |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <dd7e9be5-ee3b-4f09-976a-7233ebaec6c1@googlegroups.com> |
| Xref | csiph.com sci.physics:586128 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 22/06/2016 9:08 AM, omnilobe@gmail.com wrote: > I did not do the experiment. Do you expect that two similar magnets > attract with a force F and repel with a force -0.9F at a distance of > zero between the magnets? > > The experiment is simple, but rarely mentioned. The "pull force" is > measured for a magnet using a spring scale. The attraction force is > measured and reported as F Newtons for one test. But the force when > the magnets repel is not reported as "push force". > > The lack of standardization of magnet specs might be because of the > fear of being wrong in some common cases. The manufacturers should > publish tables of magnet force versus Tesla flux density. > > Proposed Theory : two equal permanent magnets attract stronger than > they repel because of flux bundling. The attracting flux is bundled > and the repelling flux is diverging. Two North poles facing each > other must never let flux cross flux, so they diverge. A North facing > a South magnetic pole does not cross flux lines, it completes flux > lines, so a tightening of the flux bundle occurs where the two > magnets touch. Any stray flux gets pulled closer to the attracting > magnets. But repelling magnets have flux diverging into stray > locations. > It's not as if flux is a real thing, it's just an indication of the direction and strength of the field. Clearly, flux lines cannot cross because that would mean that the field and strength at the point of intersection had more than one value - a physical impossibility. The field at any point is just the sum the fields of the individual magnets at that point. If you're seeing differences in attraction and repulsion, it's just because the field of each magnet affects the other magnet. Sylvia.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Magnets repel more weakly than attract omnilobe@gmail.com - 2016-06-21 16:08 -0700
Magnets repel more weakly than attract john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 16:20 -0700
Re: Magnets repel more weakly than attract "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 19:31 -0700
Re: Magnets repel more weakly than attract omnilobe@gmail.com - 2016-06-21 21:02 -0700
Re: Magnets repel more weakly than attract Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-06-22 15:57 +1000
Re: Magnets repel more weakly than attract omnilobe@gmail.com - 2016-06-22 08:28 -0700
Re: Magnets repel more weakly than attract Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-06-23 12:07 +1000
Re: Magnets repel more weakly than attract benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-06-23 17:29 -0400
Re: Magnets repel more weakly than attract Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-06-24 10:10 +1000
Re: Magnets repel more weakly than attract "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-24 08:44 -0700
Re: Magnets repel more weakly than attract Timo <timo@physics.uq.edu.au> - 2016-06-24 15:05 -0700
Re: Magnets repel more weakly than attract Timo <timo@physics.uq.edu.au> - 2016-06-24 03:36 -0700
Re: Magnets repel more weakly than attract "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-23 16:42 -0700
Re: Magnets repel more weakly than attract Timo <timo@physics.uq.edu.au> - 2016-06-24 17:56 -0700
Re: Magnets repel more weakly than attract "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-23 15:32 -0700
Re: Magnets repel more weakly than attract Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2016-06-23 07:20 +0200
Re: Magnets repel more weakly than attract "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-22 11:47 -0700
Re: Magnets repel more weakly than attract benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-06-22 16:17 -0400
Re: Magnets repel more weakly than attract "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-22 15:45 -0700
Re: Magnets repel more weakly than attract "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-06-23 02:32 -0700
Re: Magnets repel more weakly than attract "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-24 08:41 -0700
Re: Magnets repel more weakly than attract "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-23 15:30 -0700
Re: Magnets repel more weakly than attract "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-06-23 16:41 -0700
csiph-web