Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #581147
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Does anyone really know the physical cause for time dilation and length contraction? |
| Date | 2016-05-28 18:19 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <dqt2klFfdhtU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (14 earlier) <fdbc99dd-2df1-452b-a121-5d06c89ba697@googlegroups.com> <usWdnT9wj7B-LtzKnZ2dnUU7-TWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <32942a53-9547-4078-9fb3-1580954866c6@googlegroups.com> <dqpntoFpvbuU2@mid.individual.net> <66e97ad6-8cdf-4e8a-8455-667235108725@googlegroups.com> |
On 27/05/2016 5:20 PM, jay moseley wrote: > Sylvia wrote >> Exactly as not observed in the photoelectric affect. There is a threshold frequency, below which the effect is absent, and above which the effect is noted. If this were a resonance effect, then frequencies significantly above the threshold frequency would also not produce the effect. This is hugely at variance with >the experimental result. > > Its a complex picture I admit. But notice that the lower > threshold *varies* for each element. Thats consistent > with different resonant frequencies for each element. > Different resonant systems have different responses. It's also consistent with the electrons in different elements requiring different energies to escape. > > But if your argument were true, and yes Ive looked at the > kinetic energy vs frequency graphs you refer to, one > would not get different spectral responsivity for different > elements in solar panels. Obviously certain frequencies > above threshold levels are NOT producing the effect the > graph insinuates of a smooth ever increasing response > to frequency. Solar panels are semiconductors, with hugely more complexity than just ejecting electrons into a vacuum. Sylvia.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Does anyone really know the physical cause for time dilation and length contraction? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-05-27 11:58 +1000
Re: Does anyone really know the physical cause for time dilation and length contraction? jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-05-27 00:20 -0700
Re: Does anyone really know the physical cause for time dilation and length contraction? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-05-28 18:19 +1000
Re: Does anyone really know the physical cause for time dilation and length contraction? jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-05-28 06:34 -0700
Re: Does anyone really know the physical cause for time dilation and length contraction? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-05-27 12:53 -0700
Re: Does anyone really know the physical cause for time dilation and length contraction? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-05-27 17:01 -0700
csiph-web